Literature DB >> 27118442

Guidance on conducting systematic reviews/meta-analyses of pharmacoepidemiological studies of safety outcomes: the gap is now filled.

S Cortese1.   

Abstract

Until recently, no comprehensive guidance specifically on the conduction of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of pharmacoepidemiological studies of safety outcomes was available. In December 2015, the European Network of Centres for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharamacovigilance (ENCePP), a network coordinated by the European Medicines Agency, published their 'Guidance on conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of completed comparative pharmacoepidemiological studies of safety outcomes', filling an important gap in the field. This paper highlights the ENCePP recommendations in terms of study identification, data extraction, study quality appraisal and analytical plan. Although the ENCePP document should not be considered as definitive, since it will likely be refined following researchers' feedback, it is expected that it will be highly influential and useful for the field, with the ultimate goal to improve and standardise the conduction and reporting of systematic reviews/meta-analyses of pharmacoepidemiological studies of safety outcomes.

Keywords:  Pharmacoepidemiology; meta-analysis; safety; systematic review

Year:  2016        PMID: 27118442      PMCID: PMC7137583          DOI: 10.1017/S2045796016000299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci        ISSN: 2045-7960            Impact factor:   6.892


  5 in total

1.  Development of the RTI item bank on risk of bias and precision of observational studies.

Authors:  Meera Viswanathan; Nancy D Berkman
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Why it is important to include unpublished data in systematic reviews.

Authors:  C Trespidi; C Barbui; A Cipriani
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 6.892

3.  What are evidence-based treatment recommendations?

Authors:  C Barbui; A Cipriani
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 6.892

Review 4.  Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group.

Authors:  D F Stroup; J A Berlin; S C Morton; I Olkin; G D Williamson; D Rennie; D Moher; B J Becker; T A Sipe; S B Thacker
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-04-19       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Alessandro Liberati; Douglas G Altman; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Cynthia Mulrow; Peter C Gøtzsche; John P A Ioannidis; Mike Clarke; P J Devereaux; Jos Kleijnen; David Moher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-21
  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Is It Necessary to Perform the Pharmacological Interventions for Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy? A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Jie Zhou; Sheng Zhang; Xu-Lin Wang; Yu-Long Jia; Shu He; Yuan-Yuan Wang; Wen-Chao Li; Jian-Guo Shao; Xun Zhuang; Yuan-Lin Liu; Gang Qin
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.859

2.  Safety of azithromycin in pediatrics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Linan Zeng; Peipei Xu; Imti Choonara; Zhenyan Bo; Xiangchen Pan; Wenyan Li; Xiaofeng Ni; Tao Xiong; Can Chen; Leshan Huang; Shamim Ahmad Qazi; Dezhi Mu; Lingli Zhang
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 2.953

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.