Literature DB >> 27118441

A Randomized, Phase II Trial of Cetuximab With or Without PX-866, an Irreversible Oral Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Inhibitor, in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma.

Daniel W Bowles1, Mark Kochenderfer2, Allen Cohn3, Lucas Sideris4, Nghia Nguyen5, Vivian Cline-Burkhardt6, Ian Schnadig7, Minsig Choi8, Lisle Nabell9, Arvind Chaudhry10, Robert Ruxer11, Antonio Ucar12, Diana Hausman13, Luke Walker13, Alexander Spira14, Antonio Jimeno15.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The phosphotidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K)/serine-threonine kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin signaling pathway is frequently altered in colorectal cancer (CRC). PX-866 is an oral, irreversible, pan-isoform inhibitor of PI3K. This randomized phase II study evaluated cetuximab with or without PX-866 in patients with metastatic, anti-epidermal growth factor receptor-naive, KRAS codon 12 and 13 wild-type CRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic CRC who had received both oxaliplatin and irinotecan were randomized (1:1) to cetuximab (400 mg/m2 loading then 250 mg/m2 weekly) with or without PX-866 (8 mg orally daily; arms A and B, respectively). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate, overall survival (OS), toxicity, and correlation of relevant biomarkers with efficacy outcomes.
RESULTS: A total of 85 patients were enrolled. The median PFS was 59 days versus 104 days for arms A (cetuximab + PX-866) and B (cetuximab alone), respectively (P = .77). OS between the 2 arms (266 vs. 333 days for arm A vs. B) were similar (P = .83). Overall toxicity, including treatment-related toxicity, was higher in arm A compared with arm B, especially in terms of all-grade nausea (66% vs. 37%), vomiting (50% vs. 29%), diarrhea (64% vs. 18%), and rash (66% vs. 37%). Grade 3 diarrhea occurred in 19% of patients in Arm A and 0% in Arm B. PIK3CA mutations and PTEN loss by immunohistochemistry were infrequently seen.
CONCLUSION: The addition of PX-866 to cetuximab did not improve PFS, objective response rate, or OS in patients with metastatic CRC. The combination arm had greater toxicity and may have been harmful in this study. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Combination therapy; EGFR; KRAS; PI3K; PIK3CA

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27118441     DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2016.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer        ISSN: 1533-0028            Impact factor:   4.481


  11 in total

Review 1.  Targeting the PI3K pathway in cancer: are we making headway?

Authors:  Filip Janku; Timothy A Yap; Funda Meric-Bernstam
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  Drug Resistance in Colorectal Cancer: From Mechanism to Clinic.

Authors:  Qianyu Wang; Xiaofei Shen; Gang Chen; Junfeng Du
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 3.  Oncogenic fingerprint of epidermal growth factor receptor pathway and emerging epidermal growth factor receptor blockade resistance in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Zain A Sobani; Ashwin Sawant; Mikram Jafri; Amit Keith Correa; Ibrahim Halil Sahin
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-10-10

Review 4.  Recent advances in the use of PI3K inhibitors for glioblastoma multiforme: current preclinical and clinical development.

Authors:  Hua-Fu Zhao; Jing Wang; Wei Shao; Chang-Peng Wu; Zhong-Ping Chen; Shing-Shun Tony To; Wei-Ping Li
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 27.401

5.  Efficacy of PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway inhibitors for the treatment of advanced solid cancers: A literature-based meta-analysis of 46 randomised control trials.

Authors:  Xuan Li; Danian Dai; Bo Chen; Hailin Tang; Xiaoming Xie; Weidong Wei
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Clinically Integrated Molecular Diagnostics in Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma.

Authors:  Julia Thierauf; Nisha Ramamurthy; Vickie Y Jo; Hayley Robinson; Ryan P Frazier; Jonathan Gonzalez; Maciej Pacula; Enrique Dominguez Meneses; Vania Nose; Valentina Nardi; Dora Dias-Santagata; Long P Le; Derrick T Lin; William C Faquin; Lori J Wirth; Jochen Hess; A John Iafrate; Jochen K Lennerz
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-03-29

Review 7.  Resistance to anti-EGFR therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer: underlying mechanisms and reversal strategies.

Authors:  Qing Ji; Qi Li; Jing Zhou
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-10-18

Review 8.  PI3K inhibitors: review and new strategies.

Authors:  Mingzhen Zhang; Hyunbum Jang; Ruth Nussinov
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 9.825

9.  Interest to consider re-challenging by cetuximab and platinum containing regimen in recurrent Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Christian Borel; Olivier Regnier-Gavier; Hélène Carinato; Sébastien Guihard; Delphine Antoni; Martin Demarchi; Florian Sirlin; Delphine Exinger; Emilie Petit-Jean; Alicia Thiery; Guy Bronner; Philippe Schultz; Henri Flesch; Véronique Frasie; Danielle Prébay; Thierry Petit; Alain C Jung; Mickael Burgy; Pierre Coliat
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-12-25

10.  Is there an efficacy-effectiveness gap between randomized controlled trials and real-world studies in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiao Zhang; Shihui Fu; Rui Meng; Yu Ren; Ye Shang; Lei Tian
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.