Alexander C M Chong1, Ryan C Pate2, Daniel J Prohaska3, Tyler R Bron4, Paul H Wooley5. 1. Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, The University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Wichita, Kansas, U.S.A.; Via Christi Health-Orthopedic Research Institute, Wichita, Kansas, U.S.A.. Electronic address: alexander.chong@viachristi.org. 2. Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, The University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Wichita, Kansas, U.S.A.; Robert J Dole VA Medical Center, Wichita, Kansas, U.S.A. 3. Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, The University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Wichita, Kansas, U.S.A.; Advanced Orthopaedics Associates, Wichita, Kansas, U.S.A. 4. Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, The University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Wichita, Kansas, U.S.A. 5. Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, The University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Wichita, Kansas, U.S.A.; Via Christi Health-Orthopedic Research Institute, Wichita, Kansas, U.S.A.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To validate basic competency in arthroscopic knot tying using a unique simulator device to compare the level of training needed for learning and tying the arthroscopic knot by evaluating the tensile properties of the arthroscopic knots. METHODS: Three groups of surgeons of various experience levels (postgraduate year [PGY] 1, PGY 3, and experienced surgeons) tied 2 different arthroscopic knots (Tennessee Slider, considered easier, and Weston, considered more difficult) over a 10-week period. Each group went through 3 separate stages of knot tying: stage 1, tying 8 knots without cannula or knot pusher; stage 2, tying 12 knots with knot pusher; and stage 3, tying 20 knots with knot pusher through a cannula that simulates knot tying during surgery. A single load-to-failure test was performed and ultimate clinical failure loads were recorded. Time needed to tie each knot was also recorded. RESULTS: At stages 1 and 2, the PGY 1 group had a significantly weak knot tensile strength (Tennessee Slider stage 1: 60 v 129 N, P = .001; Tennessee Slider stage 2: 69 v 132 N, P = .0029; Weston stage 1: 73 v 184 N, P = .0000; Weston stage 2: 125 v 173 N, P = .0045) and were slower (Weston: 56 v 30 seconds, P = .0010) than the experienced surgeon group for both knots. At stage 3, only the initial 2 weeks of Tennessee Slider showed a significant difference between groups 1 and 3 (week 6: 87 v 118 N, P = .0492; week 7: 89 v 126, P = .01485). Even though the Tennessee Slider knot is one of the easier arthroscopic knots to learn to tie, the results showed a slow trend of improvement in this knot-tying skill for group 1 after each stage. CONCLUSIONS: The data validated an important learning effect in all trainees in arthroscopic knot tying over a 10-week period and showed that inexperienced trainees will be able to improve their knot-tying skill with training in 3 stages with a simulator environment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The findings of this study indicated the importance of hands-on experience in performing arthroscopic knot tying, as determined by both knot performance and ultimate suture loop strength. In addition, each orthopaedic resident learned and developed his or her arthroscopic knot-tying skills and provided a foundation for his or her future practice in orthopaedic medicine.
PURPOSE: To validate basic competency in arthroscopic knot tying using a unique simulator device to compare the level of training needed for learning and tying the arthroscopic knot by evaluating the tensile properties of the arthroscopic knots. METHODS: Three groups of surgeons of various experience levels (postgraduate year [PGY] 1, PGY 3, and experienced surgeons) tied 2 different arthroscopic knots (Tennessee Slider, considered easier, and Weston, considered more difficult) over a 10-week period. Each group went through 3 separate stages of knot tying: stage 1, tying 8 knots without cannula or knot pusher; stage 2, tying 12 knots with knot pusher; and stage 3, tying 20 knots with knot pusher through a cannula that simulates knot tying during surgery. A single load-to-failure test was performed and ultimate clinical failure loads were recorded. Time needed to tie each knot was also recorded. RESULTS: At stages 1 and 2, the PGY 1 group had a significantly weak knot tensile strength (Tennessee Slider stage 1: 60 v 129 N, P = .001; Tennessee Slider stage 2: 69 v 132 N, P = .0029; Weston stage 1: 73 v 184 N, P = .0000; Weston stage 2: 125 v 173 N, P = .0045) and were slower (Weston: 56 v 30 seconds, P = .0010) than the experienced surgeon group for both knots. At stage 3, only the initial 2 weeks of Tennessee Slider showed a significant difference between groups 1 and 3 (week 6: 87 v 118 N, P = .0492; week 7: 89 v 126, P = .01485). Even though the Tennessee Slider knot is one of the easier arthroscopic knots to learn to tie, the results showed a slow trend of improvement in this knot-tying skill for group 1 after each stage. CONCLUSIONS: The data validated an important learning effect in all trainees in arthroscopic knot tying over a 10-week period and showed that inexperienced trainees will be able to improve their knot-tying skill with training in 3 stages with a simulator environment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The findings of this study indicated the importance of hands-on experience in performing arthroscopic knot tying, as determined by both knot performance and ultimate suture loop strength. In addition, each orthopaedic resident learned and developed his or her arthroscopic knot-tying skills and provided a foundation for his or her future practice in orthopaedic medicine.
Authors: Caellagh D Morrissey; Darby A Houck; Esther Jang; Eric C McCarty; Jonathan T Bravman; Adam J Seidl; Michelle L Wolcott; Armando F Vidal; Rachel M Frank Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2020-04-24