Literature DB >> 27117482

How to do (or not to do)… gender analysis in health systems research.

Rosemary Morgan1, Asha George2, Sarah Ssali3, Kate Hawkins4, Sassy Molyneux5, Sally Theobald6.   

Abstract

Gender-the socially constructed roles, behaviours, activities and attributes that a given society considers appropriate for males, females and other genders-affects how people live, work and relate to each other at all levels, including in relation to the health system. Health systems research (HSR) aims to inform more strategic, effective and equitable health systems interventions, programs and policies; and the inclusion of gender analysis into HSR is a core part of that endeavour. We outline what gender analysis is and how gender analysis can be incorporated into HSR content, process and outcomes Starting with HSR content, i.e. the substantive focus of HSR, we recommend exploring whether and how gender power relations affect females and males in health systems through the use of sex disaggregated data, gender frameworks and questions. Sex disaggregation flags female-male differences or similarities that warrant further analysis; and further analysis is guided by gender frameworks and questions to understand how gender power relations are constituted and negotiated in health systems. Critical aspects of understanding gender power relations include examining who has what (access to resources); who does what (the division of labour and everyday practices); how values are defined (social norms) and who decides (rules and decision-making). Secondly, we examine gender in HSR process by reflecting on how the research process itself is imbued with power relations. We focus on data collection and analysis by reviewing who participates as respondents; when data is collected and where; who is present; who collects data and who analyses data. Thirdly, we consider gender and HSR outcomes by considering who is empowered and disempowered as a result of HSR, including the extent to which HSR outcomes progressively transform gender power relations in health systems, or at least do not further exacerbate them.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Framework; gender; gender analysis; health systems; health systems research

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27117482      PMCID: PMC6616028          DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czw037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy Plan        ISSN: 0268-1080            Impact factor:   3.344


  67 in total

1.  The association of female sex with application of evidence-based practice recommendations for perioperative care in hip fracture surgery.

Authors:  Natalie Cho; Laura Boland; Daniel I McIsaac
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Disrupting gender norms in health systems: making the case for change.

Authors:  Katherine Hay; Lotus McDougal; Valerie Percival; Sarah Henry; Jeni Klugman; Haja Wurie; Joanna Raven; Fortunate Shabalala; Rebecca Fielding-Miller; Arnab Dey; Nabamallika Dehingia; Rosemary Morgan; Yamini Atmavilas; Niranjan Saggurti; Jennifer Yore; Elena Blokhina; Rumana Huque; Edwine Barasa; Nandita Bhan; Chandani Kharel; Jay G Silverman; Anita Raj
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Predicting psychiatric readmission: sex-specific models to predict 30-day readmission following acute psychiatric hospitalization.

Authors:  Lucy Church Barker; Andrea Gruneir; Kinwah Fung; Nathan Herrmann; Paul Kurdyak; Elizabeth Lin; Paula A Rochon; Dallas Seitz; Valerie H Taylor; Simone N Vigod
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 4.328

4.  Understanding the factors affecting the attraction and retention of health professionals in rural and remote areas: a mixed-method study in Niger.

Authors:  Loubna Belaid; Christian Dagenais; Mahaman Moha; Valéry Ridde
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2017-09-04

5.  Identifying key prescribing cascades in older people (iKASCADE): a transnational initiative on drug safety through a sex and gender lens-rationale and design.

Authors:  Shelley A Sternberg; Mirko Petrovic; Graziano Onder; Antonio Cherubini; Denis O'Mahony; Jerry H Gurwitz; Francesco Pegreffi; Robin Mason; Jennifer Akerman; Lisa McCarthy; Andrea Lawson; Joyce Li; Wei Wu; Paula A Rochon
Journal:  Eur Geriatr Med       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 1.710

6.  Double distress: women healthcare providers and moral distress during COVID-19.

Authors:  Julia Smith; Alexander Korzuchowski; Christina Memmott; Niki Oveisi; Heang-Lee Tan; Rosemary Morgan
Journal:  Nurs Ethics       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 3.344

7.  The role of gender power relations on women's health outcomes: evidence from a maternal health coverage survey in Simiyu region, Tanzania.

Authors:  Henri M Garrison-Desany; Emily Wilson; Melinda Munos; Talata Sawadogo-Lewis; Abdoulaye Maïga; Onome Ako; Serafina Mkuwa; Amy J Hobbs; Rosemary Morgan
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 8.  Zooming in and out: a holistic framework for research on maternal, late foetal and newborn survival and health.

Authors:  Neha S Singh; Andrea K Blanchard; Hannah Blencowe; Adam D Koon; Ties Boerma; Sudha Sharma; Oona M R Campbell
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 3.547

9.  Gender discrimination and illicit drug use among African American and European American adolescents and emerging adults.

Authors:  Manik Ahuja; Angela M Haeny; Carolyn E Sartor; Kathleen K Bucholz
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2020-09-10

10.  Successes, challenges, and support for men versus women implementers in water, sanitation, and hygiene programs: A qualitative study in rural Nepal.

Authors:  Darcy M Anderson; Ankush Kumar Gupta; Sarah Birken; Zoe Sakas; Matthew C Freeman
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 7.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.