Sepideh Elyasi1, Hossein Khalili2. 1. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. elyasis@mums.ac.ir. 2. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Utilization of higher doses of vancomycin to achieve the trough concentrations of 15-20 mg/L for complicated infections has been recommended by the Infectious Diseases Society of America clinical practice guideline in recent years. Concerning this recommendation, several nomograms have been constructed targeting this optimal trough level range in different populations of patients. In this review, we have collected available nomograms targeting high trough serum levels of vancomycin, particularly comparing their advantages and limitations. METHOD: The data were collected by searching Scopus, PubMed, Google scholar, Medline, and Cochrane database systematic reviews. The key words used as search terms were "vancomycin", "high trough level", "dosing nomogram", "dosing strategy", "neonates", "critically ill", "pediatrics", and "hemodialysis". We have included 17 related human studies published up to the date of this publication. RESULTS & CONCLUSION: Most of the available nomograms have determined the doses according to body weight and renal function. Their initial predicting success rate were 44-76 % for non-critically ill patients, 42-84 % for critically ill patients, 54 % for one nomogram specially designed for hemodialysis patients, and 71 % for the only nomogram developed for neonates. Based on validation studies, in most of cases, using a vancomycin dosing nomogram significantly improved and accelerated achievement of target trough concentrations. However, it should be noted that there are limited data about patients' clinical and microbiological outcomes and they are only validated in narrow groups of patients. Thus, their widespread application could not be encouraged for all patients before performing adequately powered, prospective randomized studies.
PURPOSE: Utilization of higher doses of vancomycin to achieve the trough concentrations of 15-20 mg/L for complicated infections has been recommended by the Infectious Diseases Society of America clinical practice guideline in recent years. Concerning this recommendation, several nomograms have been constructed targeting this optimal trough level range in different populations of patients. In this review, we have collected available nomograms targeting high trough serum levels of vancomycin, particularly comparing their advantages and limitations. METHOD: The data were collected by searching Scopus, PubMed, Google scholar, Medline, and Cochrane database systematic reviews. The key words used as search terms were "vancomycin", "high trough level", "dosing nomogram", "dosing strategy", "neonates", "critically ill", "pediatrics", and "hemodialysis". We have included 17 related human studies published up to the date of this publication. RESULTS & CONCLUSION: Most of the available nomograms have determined the doses according to body weight and renal function. Their initial predicting success rate were 44-76 % for non-critically ill patients, 42-84 % for critically ill patients, 54 % for one nomogram specially designed for hemodialysis patients, and 71 % for the only nomogram developed for neonates. Based on validation studies, in most of cases, using a vancomycin dosing nomogram significantly improved and accelerated achievement of target trough concentrations. However, it should be noted that there are limited data about patients' clinical and microbiological outcomes and they are only validated in narrow groups of patients. Thus, their widespread application could not be encouraged for all patients before performing adequately powered, prospective randomized studies.
Entities:
Keywords:
Dosing nomogram; High trough level; Vancomycin
Authors: Kathleen A Marquis; Jeremy R DeGrado; Stephanie Labonville; David W Kubiak; Paul M Szumita Journal: Ann Pharmacother Date: 2015-05-19 Impact factor: 3.154
Authors: Erik M van Maarseveen; Annemien Bouma; Daniel J Touw; Cees Neef; Arthur R H van Zanten Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2014-08-30 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: J J De Waele; I Danneels; P Depuydt; J Decruyenaere; M Bourgeois; E Hoste Journal: Int J Antimicrob Agents Date: 2013-02-12 Impact factor: 5.283
Authors: Catherine Liu; Arnold Bayer; Sara E Cosgrove; Robert S Daum; Scott K Fridkin; Rachel J Gorwitz; Sheldon L Kaplan; Adolf W Karchmer; Donald P Levine; Barbara E Murray; Michael J Rybak; David A Talan; Henry F Chambers Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2011-02-01 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: M L Avent; V L Vaska; B A Rogers; A C Cheng; S J van Hal; N E Holmes; B P Howden; D L Paterson Journal: Intern Med J Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 2.048
Authors: Riley D Bowers; April A Cooper; Catherine L Wente; Dustin T Wilson; Steven W Johnson; Richard H Drew Journal: Pharm Pract (Granada) Date: 2018-08-13