Literature DB >> 27117141

The behavioral effects of a mixed efficacy antinociceptive peptide, VRP26, following chronic administration in mice.

Jessica P Anand1, Brett T Boyer1, Henry I Mosberg2, Emily M Jutkiewicz3.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: VRP26 displays mu opioid receptor agonist and delta opioid receptor antagonist activity in vitro, a pharmacological profile purported to produce reduced tolerance, dependence, and rewarding effects. We hypothesized that VRP26 would display reduced adverse effects after chronic administration as compared with the traditional opioid analgesic fentanyl.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to explore the development of tolerance, dependence, and conditioned place preference of VRP26 as compared with the traditional opioid analgesic fentanyl.
METHODS: The antinociceptive effects of VRP26 and fentanyl were assessed using the mouse warm water tail withdrawal (WWTW) assay. Measurement of antinociceptive tolerance and physical dependence occurred after 7 days of continuous administration of either fentanyl (0.3 mg/kg/day) or VRP26 (10 mg/kg/day); tolerance was measured by a shift in the antinociceptive dose response curve in the WWTW assay. Physical dependence was determined by observation of withdrawal symptoms after precipitated withdrawal. Rewarding effects were measured by the ability of VRP26 or fentanyl to produce conditioned place preference.
RESULTS: Fentanyl produced significant tolerance and dependence, as well as significant conditioned place preference. VRP26 produced neither tolerance nor physical dependence, nor did it produce significant conditioned place preference.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that chronic treatment with VRP26 may produce less tolerance or physical dependence than chronic treatment with clinically available mu opioid analgesics such as fentanyl. Additionally, VRP26 produces less rewarding effects than fentanyl. This desirable in vivo profile may be due to the mixed efficacy nature of VRP26 and could provide the framework for safer opioid analgesics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conditioned place preference; Delta opioid receptor; Dependence; Mixed efficacy; Reward; Tolerance; mu opioid receptor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27117141      PMCID: PMC5068912          DOI: 10.1007/s00213-016-4296-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  32 in total

1.  Asymmetric synthesis and in vitro and in vivo activity of tetrahydroquinolines featuring a diverse set of polar substitutions at the 6 position as mixed-efficacy μ opioid receptor/δ opioid receptor ligands.

Authors:  Aaron M Bender; Nicholas W Griggs; Jessica P Anand; John R Traynor; Emily M Jutkiewicz; Henry I Mosberg
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 4.418

2.  Differential effects of naltrindole on morphine-induced tolerance and physical dependence in rats.

Authors:  M J Hepburn; P J Little; J Gingras; C M Kuhn
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.030

3.  Pentapeptides displaying mu opioid receptor agonist and delta opioid receptor partial agonist/antagonist properties.

Authors:  Lauren C Purington; Irina D Pogozheva; John R Traynor; Henry I Mosberg
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Synthesis, modeling, and pharmacological evaluation of UMB 425, a mixed μ agonist/δ antagonist opioid analgesic with reduced tolerance liabilities.

Authors:  Jason R Healy; Padmavani Bezawada; Jihyun Shim; Jace W Jones; Maureen A Kane; Alexander D MacKerell; Andrew Coop; Rae R Matsumoto
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 4.418

Review 5.  Bi- or multifunctional opioid peptide drugs.

Authors:  Peter W Schiller
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 5.037

Review 6.  Opioid dependence and addiction during opioid treatment of chronic pain.

Authors:  Jane C Ballantyne; Steven K LaForge
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 7.  Simultaneous targeting of multiple opioid receptors: a strategy to improve side-effect profile.

Authors:  N Dietis; R Guerrini; G Calo; S Salvadori; D J Rowbotham; D G Lambert
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Effects of N-methylnaloxone and N-methylnaltrexone on nociception and precipitated abstinence in mice.

Authors:  K Ramabadran
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1982 Sep 20-27       Impact factor: 5.037

9.  Development of a bioavailable μ opioid receptor (MOPr) agonist, δ opioid receptor (DOPr) antagonist peptide that evokes antinociception without development of acute tolerance.

Authors:  Henry I Mosberg; Larisa Yeomans; Jessica P Anand; Vanessa Porter; Katarzyna Sobczyk-Kojiro; John R Traynor; Emily M Jutkiewicz
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 7.446

10.  MDAN-21: A Bivalent Opioid Ligand Containing mu-Agonist and Delta-Antagonist Pharmacophores and Its Effects in Rhesus Monkeys.

Authors:  Mario D Aceto; Louis S Harris; S Stevens Negus; Matthew L Banks; Larry D Hughes; Eyup Akgün; Philip S Portoghese
Journal:  Int J Med Chem       Date:  2012-04-29
View more
  7 in total

1.  A Novel Mu-Delta Opioid Agonist Demonstrates Enhanced Efficacy With Reduced Tolerance and Dependence in Mouse Neuropathic Pain Models.

Authors:  Wei Lei; Rakesh H Vekariya; Subramaniam Ananthan; John M Streicher
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 5.820

2.  Delta/mu opioid receptor interactions in operant conditioning assays of pain-depressed responding and drug-induced rate suppression: assessment of therapeutic index in male Sprague Dawley rats.

Authors:  Katherine Cone; Janell Lanpher; Abigail Kinens; Philomena Richard; Sarah Couture; Rebecca Brackin; Emily Payne; Kylee Harrington; Kenner C Rice; Glenn W Stevenson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  In vivo effects of μ-opioid receptor agonist/δ-opioid receptor antagonist peptidomimetics following acute and repeated administration.

Authors:  Jessica P Anand; Kelsey E Kochan; Anthony F Nastase; Deanna Montgomery; Nicholas W Griggs; John R Traynor; Henry I Mosberg; Emily M Jutkiewicz
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  Synthesis and Pharmacology of a Novel μ-δ Opioid Receptor Heteromer-Selective Agonist Based on the Carfentanyl Template.

Authors:  Abdelfattah Faouzi; Rajendra Uprety; Ivone Gomes; Nicolas Massaly; Attila I Keresztes; Valerie Le Rouzic; Achla Gupta; Tiffany Zhang; Hye Jean Yoon; Michael Ansonoff; Abdullah Allaoa; Ying Xian Pan; John Pintar; Jose A Morón; John M Streicher; Lakshmi A Devi; Susruta Majumdar
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 5.  Novel Molecular Strategies and Targets for Opioid Drug Discovery for the Treatment of Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Keith M Olson; Wei Lei; Attila Keresztes; Justin LaVigne; John M Streicher
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2017-03-29

6.  Differential Effects of a Novel Opioid Ligand UTA1003 on Antinociceptive Tolerance and Motor Behaviour.

Authors:  Alok K Paul; Krystel L Woolley; Mohammed Rahmatullah; Polrat Wilairatana; Jason A Smith; Nuri Gueven; Nikolas Dietis
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-24

7.  Synthesis and Structure-Activity Relationships of 5'-Aryl-14-alkoxypyridomorphinans: Identification of a μ Opioid Receptor Agonist/δ Opioid Receptor Antagonist Ligand with Systemic Antinociceptive Activity and Diminished Opioid Side Effects.

Authors:  Rakesh H Vekariya; Wei Lei; Abhisek Ray; Surendra K Saini; Sixue Zhang; Gabriella Molnar; Deborah Barlow; Kelly L Karlage; Edward J Bilsky; Karen L Houseknecht; Tally M Largent-Milnes; John M Streicher; Subramaniam Ananthan
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 8.039

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.