| Literature DB >> 27116689 |
Lalit Maini1, Santosh Kumar1, Sahil Batra1, Rajat Gupta1, Sumit Arora2,3.
Abstract
Avascular necrosis (AVN) of femoral head is a recognised complication of fracture dislocation of the hip joint but is not studied frequently in relation to acetabulum fractures. The aim was to establish the relationship between obturator externus and piriformis muscle morphology in acetabulum fractures and potenital development of AVN of the femoral head. Twenty-five fractures were included in this prospective study and were subjected to radiological assessment and computed tomography of the pelvis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the hip was performed to assess the morphology of obturator externus and piriformis, and findings were compared intraoperatively (in 15 cases). Serial radiographs were taken at monthly intervals to assess the development of avascular necrosis. The patients with no evidence of AVN on radiographs at 6 months had additional MRI scans to look for such changes. Three patients developed AVN of femoral head and two had complete tears of piriformis and/or obturator externus muscles on the pre-operative MRI with the findings confirmed intraoperatively (p = 0.013). None of the patients without changes of AVN at 6-month follow-up had complete tears of either or both muscles. Of these patients, there was one case each of T-type fracture, isolated posterior wall fracture with hip dislocation, and posterior wall with transverse fracture of the acetabulum. Complete tears of obturator externus and/or piriformis muscles are a strong predictor of future development of AVN of the femoral head.Entities:
Keywords: Acetabular fracture; Avascular necrosis; Femoral head; Obturator externus; Piriformis
Year: 2016 PMID: 27116689 PMCID: PMC4960055 DOI: 10.1007/s11751-016-0253-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr ISSN: 1828-8928
Detailed outline of all the 25 patients in our series
| S no | # Type | Treatment | Delay in surgery (days) | Surgical approach | MRI findings | Intraoperative findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Transverse | Operative | 3 | Posterior | Contusion/partial tear both muscles | Same |
| 2 | Transverse | Non-operative | – | – | Both intact | – |
| 3 | T-type | Operative | 12 | Ant + post | Complete tear either/both | Same |
| 4 | Ant + post hemi transverse | Operative | 4 | Anterior | Both intact | – |
| 5 | T-type | Operative | 3 | Anterior | Contusion/partial tear both muscles | – |
| 6 | Post wall | Operative | 4 | Posterior | Complete tear either/both | Same |
| 7 | Post wall | Non-operative | – | – | Both intact | – |
| 8 | Transverse | Operative | 7 | Anterior | Contusion/partial tear obturator externus | – |
| 9 | Posterior wall | Operative | 5 | Posterior | Both intact | Same |
| 10 | T-type | Operative | 5 | Posterior | Contusion/partial tear obturator externus | Same |
| 11 | Post wall + transverse | Operative | 3 | Posterior | Contusion/partial tear both muscles | Same |
| 12 | Bicolumnar | Operative | 3 | Posterior | Contusion/partial tear piriformis | Contusion/partial tear both muscles |
| 13 | Transverse | Operative | 8 | Posterior | Contusion/partial tear both muscles | Same |
| 14 | Transverse | Non-operative | – | – | Both intact | – |
| 15 | Ant column | Non-operative | – | – | Both intact | – |
| 16 | T-type | Operative | 3 | Posterior | Contusion/partial tear both muscles | Same |
| 17 | Ant column | Operative | 8 | Anterior | Contusion/partial tear both muscles | – |
| 18 | Bicolumnar | Operative | 4 | Anterior | Contusion/partial tear both muscles | – |
| 19 | T-type | Operative | 7 | Ant + post | Contusion/partial tear both muscles | Same |
| 20 | Ant column | Non-operative | – | – | Both intact | – |
| 21 | T-type | Non-operative | – | – | Both intact | – |
| 22 | Transverse | Non-operative | – | – | Both intact | – |
| 23 | T-type | Non-operative | – | – | Both intact | – |
| 24 | Post column + post wall | Non-operative | – | – | Both intact | – |
| 25 | T-type | Non-operative | – | – | Contusion/partial tear both muscles | – |
Patient number 3, 6, and 11 developed AVN of the femoral head in follow-up
Table showing detailed outlines of the patients that developed AVN of the femoral head in follow-up
| No. | Age (Y) | Sex | Type of fracture | MRI status of obturator ext. and piriformis | Management | Time since injury to surgery (days) | Associated dislocation | Approach | Intraoperative muscle status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 32 | M | T-type (Fig. | Complete tear of obturator externus, partial tear of pyriformis | Operative | 12 | Posterior | Combined | Same as MRI findings |
| 6 | 42 | F | Post. Wall (Fig. | Complete tear of both the muscles | Operative | 4 | Nil | Posterior | Same as MRI findings |
| 11 | 42 | M | Post. wall + Transverse (Fig. | Partial tear of both the muscles | Operative | 3 | Central | Posterior | Same as MRI findings |
Various reported series on acetabular fractures with possible remarks on the development of AVN of the femoral head following this injury
| S. no. | Author | Year | No. of cases | % with AVN | Hypothesis given | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Matta [ | 1988 | 121 | 0 | No | – |
| 2 | Heeg [ | 1990 | 54 | 11.2 | No | – |
| 3 | Mayo [ | 1994 | 163 | 0.6 | No | – |
| 4 | Matta [ | 1996 | 259 | 3 | No | – |
| 5 | Siebenrock [ | 2002 | 12 | 0 | Yes | Obturator externus acts as a protector for deep branch of MCFA |
| 6 | Giannoudis [ | 2005 | 2010 | 5.6 | No | – |
| 7 | Panagiotis [ | 2007 | 75 | 8 | No | – |
| 8 | Hadjicostas [ | 2008 | 31 | 6.4 | No | – |
| 9 | Tannast [ | 2010 | 60 | 0 | Yes | Injury to MCFA |
| 10 | Naranje [ | 2010 | 18 | 5.5 | No | – |
| 11 | Briffia [ | 2011 | 161 | 11.8 | No | – |
| 12 | Uchida K [ | 2012 | 91 | 0.022 | No | – |
| 13 | Mitsionis [ | 2012 | 19 | 0.053 | Yes | Greater chance of AVN in isolated posterior dislocation of the hip than dislocation with fracture |