| Literature DB >> 27116020 |
J-M Cardot1, A Garcia Arieta2, P Paixao3, I Tasevska4, B Davit5.
Abstract
The US-FDA recently posted a draft guideline for industry recommending procedures necessary to obtain a biowaiver for immediate-release oral dosage forms based on the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS). This review compares the present FDA BCS biowaiver approach, with the existing European Medicines Agency (EMA) approach, with an emphasis on similarities, difficulties, and shared challenges. Some specifics of the current EMA BCS guideline are compared with those in the recently published draft US-FDA BCS guideline. In particular, similarities and differences in the EMA versus US-FDA approaches to establishing drug solubility, permeability, dissolution, and formulation suitability for BCS biowaiver are critically reviewed. Several case studies are presented to illustrate the (i) challenges of applying for BCS biowaivers for global registration in the face of differences in the EMA and US-FDA BCS biowaiver criteria, as well as (ii) challenges inherent in applying for BCS class I or III designation and common to both jurisdictions.Keywords: BCS; EMA; US-FDA; biowaiver
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27116020 DOI: 10.1208/s12248-016-9915-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AAPS J ISSN: 1550-7416 Impact factor: 4.009