Literature DB >> 27116020

Implementing the Biopharmaceutics Classification System in Drug Development: Reconciling Similarities, Differences, and Shared Challenges in the EMA and US-FDA-Recommended Approaches.

J-M Cardot1, A Garcia Arieta2, P Paixao3, I Tasevska4, B Davit5.   

Abstract

The US-FDA recently posted a draft guideline for industry recommending procedures necessary to obtain a biowaiver for immediate-release oral dosage forms based on the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS). This review compares the present FDA BCS biowaiver approach, with the existing European Medicines Agency (EMA) approach, with an emphasis on similarities, difficulties, and shared challenges. Some specifics of the current EMA BCS guideline are compared with those in the recently published draft US-FDA BCS guideline. In particular, similarities and differences in the EMA versus US-FDA approaches to establishing drug solubility, permeability, dissolution, and formulation suitability for BCS biowaiver are critically reviewed. Several case studies are presented to illustrate the (i) challenges of applying for BCS biowaivers for global registration in the face of differences in the EMA and US-FDA BCS biowaiver criteria, as well as (ii) challenges inherent in applying for BCS class I or III designation and common to both jurisdictions.

Keywords:  BCS; EMA; US-FDA; biowaiver

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27116020     DOI: 10.1208/s12248-016-9915-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  5 in total

Review 1.  BCS Biowaivers: Similarities and Differences Among EMA, FDA, and WHO Requirements.

Authors:  Barbara M Davit; Isadore Kanfer; Yu Chung Tsang; Jean-Michel Cardot
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Interactions between active pharmaceutical ingredients and excipients affecting bioavailability: impact on bioequivalence.

Authors:  Alfredo García-Arieta
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 4.384

Review 3.  Bioequivalence of oral products and the biopharmaceutics classification system: science, regulation, and public policy.

Authors:  K S Amidon; P Langguth; H Lennernäs; L Yu; G L Amidon
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  A theoretical basis for a biopharmaceutic drug classification: the correlation of in vitro drug product dissolution and in vivo bioavailability.

Authors:  G L Amidon; H Lennernäs; V P Shah; J R Crison
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Investigating the Discriminatory Power of BCS-Biowaiver in Vitro Methodology to Detect Bioavailability Differences between Immediate Release Products Containing a Class I Drug.

Authors:  Sarin Colón-Useche; Isabel González-Álvarez; Victor Mangas-Sanjuan; Marta González-Álvarez; Pilar Pastoriza; Irene Molina-Martínez; Marival Bermejo; Alfredo García-Arieta
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 4.939

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Biowaiver Applications in Support of a Polymorph During Late-Stage Clinical Development of Verubecestat-Current Challenges and Future Opportunities for Global Regulatory Alignment.

Authors:  Andreas Abend; Leah Xiong; Xiaohua Zhang; Celeste Frankenfeld; Filippos Kesisoglou; Kevin Reuter; Pramod Kotwal
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 2.  In Vitro Dissolution and in Silico Modeling Shortcuts in Bioequivalence Testing.

Authors:  Moawia M Al-Tabakha; Muaed J Alomar
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2020-01-04       Impact factor: 6.321

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.