Literature DB >> 27115862

Population-based analysis of colorectal cancer risk after oophorectomy.

J Segelman1, L Lindström1, J Frisell1, Y Lu1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The development of colorectal cancer is influenced by hormonal factors. Oophorectomy alters endogenous levels of sex hormones, but the effect on colorectal cancer risk is unclear. The aim of this cohort study was to examine colorectal cancer risk after oophorectomy for benign indications.
METHODS: Women who had undergone oophorectomy between 1965 and 2011 were identified from the Swedish Patient Registry. Standard incidence ratios (SIRs) and 95 per cent confidence intervals for colorectal cancer risk were calculated compared with those in the general population. Stratification was carried out for unilateral and bilateral oophorectomy, and hysterectomy without specification of whether the ovaries were removed or not. Associations between the three oophorectomy options and colorectal cancer risk in different locations were assessed by means of hazard ratios (HRs) and 95 per cent confidence intervals calculated by Cox proportional hazards regression modelling.
RESULTS: Of 195 973 women who had undergone oophorectomy, 3150 (1·6 per cent) were diagnosed with colorectal cancer at a later date (median follow-up 18 years). Colorectal cancer risk was increased after oophorectomy compared with that in the general population (SIR 1·30, 95 per cent c.i. 1·26 to 1·35). The risk was lower for younger age at oophorectomy (15-39 years: SIR 1·10, 0·97 to 1·23; 40-49 years: SIR 1·26, 1·19 to 1·33; P for trend < 0·001). The risk was highest 1-4 years after oophorectomy (SIR 1·66, 1·51 to 1·81; P < 0·001). In the multivariable analysis, women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy had a higher risk of rectal cancer than those who had only unilateral oophorectomy (HR 2·28, 95 per cent c.i. 1·33 to 3·91).
CONCLUSION: Colorectal cancer risk is increased after oophorectomy for benign indications.
© 2016 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27115862     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  5 in total

1.  Risk of de novo cancer after premenopausal bilateral oophorectomy.

Authors:  Nan Huo; Carin Y Smith; Liliana Gazzuola Rocca; Walter A Rocca; Michelle M Mielke
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Incidence of other cancer diagnoses in women with breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study with 42,248 women.

Authors:  Ivan Nikolov; Karel Kostev; Matthias Kalder
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 4.624

3.  Adverse childhood experiences are associated with increased risk of hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy: A national retrospective cohort study of women in England.

Authors:  Panayotes Demakakos; Andrew Steptoe; Gita D Mishra
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 7.331

4.  Removal of all ovarian tissue versus conserving ovarian tissue at time of hysterectomy in premenopausal patients with benign disease: study using routine data and data linkage.

Authors:  Jemma Mytton; Felicity Evison; Peter J Chilton; Richard J Lilford
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-02-06

5.  Predictors of CRC Stage at Diagnosis among Male and Female Adults Participating in a Prospective Cohort Study: Findings from Alberta's Tomorrow Project.

Authors:  Monica Ghebrial; Michelle L Aktary; Qinggang Wang; John J Spinelli; Lorraine Shack; Paula J Robson; Karen A Kopciuk
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 3.677

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.