Jeffrey S Monette1, Patrick M Hutchins1, Graziella E Ronsein1, Jake Wimberger1, Angela D Irwin1, Chongren Tang1, Jaskanwal D Sara1, Baohai Shao1, Tomas Vaisar1, Amir Lerman1, Jay W Heinecke2. 1. From the Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle (J.S.M., P.M.H., G.E.R., J.W., A.D.I., C.T., B.S., T.V., J.W.H.); and Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (J.D.S., A.L.). 2. From the Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle (J.S.M., P.M.H., G.E.R., J.W., A.D.I., C.T., B.S., T.V., J.W.H.); and Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (J.D.S., A.L.). heinecke@uw.edu.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Coronary endothelial dysfunction (ED)-an early marker of atherosclerosis-increases the risk of cardiovascular events. OBJECTIVE: We tested the hypothesis that cholesterol efflux capacity and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) particle concentration predict coronary ED better than HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C). METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 80 subjects with nonobstructive (<30% stenosis) coronary artery disease. ED was defined as <50% change in coronary blood flow in response to intracoronary infusions of acetylcholine during diagnostic coronary angiography. Cholesterol efflux capacity and HDL particle concentration (HDL-PIMA) were assessed with validated assays. Cholesterol efflux capacity and HDL-PIMA were both strong, inverse predictors of ED (P<0.001 and 0.005, respectively). In contrast, HDL-C and other traditional lipid risk factors did not differ significantly between control and ED subjects. Large HDL particles were markedly decreased in ED subjects (33%; P=0.005). After correction for HDL-C, both efflux capacity and HDL-PIMA remained significant predictors of ED status. HDL-PIMA explained cholesterol efflux capacity more effectively than HDL-C (r=0.54 and 0.36, respectively). The efflux capacities of isolated HDL and serum HDL correlated strongly (r=0.49). CONCLUSIONS: Cholesterol efflux capacity and HDL-PIMA are reduced in subjects with coronary ED, independently of HDL-C. Alterations in HDL-PIMA and HDL itself account for a much larger fraction of the variation in cholesterol efflux capacity than does HDL-C. A selective decrease in large HDL particles may contribute to impaired cholesterol efflux capacity in ED subjects. These observations support a role for HDL size, concentration, and function as markers-and perhaps mediators-of coronary atherosclerosis in humans.
RATIONALE: Coronary endothelial dysfunction (ED)-an early marker of atherosclerosis-increases the risk of cardiovascular events. OBJECTIVE: We tested the hypothesis that cholesterol efflux capacity and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) particle concentration predict coronary ED better than HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C). METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 80 subjects with nonobstructive (<30% stenosis) coronary artery disease. ED was defined as <50% change in coronary blood flow in response to intracoronary infusions of acetylcholine during diagnostic coronary angiography. Cholesterol efflux capacity and HDL particle concentration (HDL-PIMA) were assessed with validated assays. Cholesterol efflux capacity and HDL-PIMA were both strong, inverse predictors of ED (P<0.001 and 0.005, respectively). In contrast, HDL-C and other traditional lipid risk factors did not differ significantly between control and ED subjects. Large HDL particles were markedly decreased in ED subjects (33%; P=0.005). After correction for HDL-C, both efflux capacity and HDL-PIMA remained significant predictors of ED status. HDL-PIMA explained cholesterol efflux capacity more effectively than HDL-C (r=0.54 and 0.36, respectively). The efflux capacities of isolated HDL and serum HDL correlated strongly (r=0.49). CONCLUSIONS:Cholesterol efflux capacity and HDL-PIMA are reduced in subjects with coronary ED, independently of HDL-C. Alterations in HDL-PIMA and HDL itself account for a much larger fraction of the variation in cholesterol efflux capacity than does HDL-C. A selective decrease in large HDL particles may contribute to impaired cholesterol efflux capacity in ED subjects. These observations support a role for HDL size, concentration, and function as markers-and perhaps mediators-of coronary atherosclerosis in humans.
Authors: Rachel H Mackey; Philip Greenland; David C Goff; Donald Lloyd-Jones; Christopher T Sibley; Samia Mora Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-07-11 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Lasse Jespersen; Anders Hvelplund; Steen Z Abildstrøm; Frants Pedersen; Søren Galatius; Jan K Madsen; Erik Jørgensen; Henning Kelbæk; Eva Prescott Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2011-09-11 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Andrew J Murphy; Mani Akhtari; Sonia Tolani; Tamara Pagler; Nora Bijl; Chao-Ling Kuo; Mi Wang; Marie Sanson; Sandra Abramowicz; Carrie Welch; Andrea E Bochem; Jan Albert Kuivenhoven; Laurent Yvan-Charvet; Alan R Tall Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Xun Wang; Heidi L Collins; Mollie Ranalletta; Ilia V Fuki; Jeffrey T Billheimer; George H Rothblat; Alan R Tall; Daniel J Rader Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Samar R El Khoudary; Patrick M Hutchins; Karen A Matthews; Maria M Brooks; Trevor J Orchard; Graziella E Ronsein; Jay W Heinecke Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2016-07-11 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Tomas Vaisar; Jenny E Kanter; Jake Wimberger; Angela D Irwin; John Gauthier; Emily Wolfson; Vanessa Bahnam; I-Hsien Wu; Hetal Shah; Hillary A Keenan; Carla J Greenbaum; George L King; Jay W Heinecke; Karin E Bornfeldt Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2019-10-09 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Marios K Georgakis; Rainer Malik; Christopher D Anderson; Klaus G Parhofer; Jemma C Hopewell; Martin Dichgans Journal: Brain Date: 2020-02-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Sara Fernández-Castillejo; Laura Rubió; Álvaro Hernáez; Úrsula Catalán; Anna Pedret; Rosa-M Valls; Juana I Mosele; Maria-Isabel Covas; Alan T Remaley; Olga Castañer; Maria-José Motilva; Rosa Solá Journal: Mol Nutr Food Res Date: 2017-10-26 Impact factor: 5.914