Literature DB >> 27114329

Flexibility in starting ovarian stimulation at different phases of the menstrual cycle for treatment of infertile women with the use of in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Ningxin Qin1, Qiuju Chen2, Qingqing Hong2, Renfei Cai2, Hongyuan Gao2, Yun Wang2, Lihua Sun2, Shaozhen Zhang2, Haiyan Guo2, Yonglun Fu2, Ai Ai2, Hui Tian2, Qifeng Lyu2, Salim Daya3, Yanping Kuang4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate flexibility in starting controlled ovarian stimulation at any phase of the menstrual cycle in infertile women undergoing treatment with assisted reproduction.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Academic tertiary-care medical center. PATIENT(S): At total of 150 infertile patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment. Ninety of the women also underwent frozen embryo transfer (FET) procedures. INTERVENTION(S): Depending on the phase of the menstrual cycle when ovarian stimulation was started, three groups of patients were identified, namely: conventional group (ovarian stimulation started in the early follicular phase), late follicular phase group, and luteal phase group. When dominant follicles were observed, final oocyte maturation was triggered with the use of GnRH agonist and hCG. In all three groups, viable embryos were cryopreserved for subsequent transfer. PRIMARY OUTCOME: number of mature oocytes retrieved. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: fertilization rate, viable embryo rate per oocyte retrieved, cancellation rate, and clinical pregnancy outcomes from FET cycles. RESULTS(S): There were no differences in the mean number of mature oocytes retrieved in the conventional group, late follicular phase group, and luteal phase group (5.7 ± 3.6, 5.2 ± 3.7, and 5.2 ± 3.9, respectively). Similarly, no significant differences were observed in the viable embryo rate per oocyte retrieved (37.9%, 38.5%, and 43.6%), clinical pregnancy rates (41.5%, 45.5%, and 38.9%), and implantation rates (30.7%, 30.2%, and 27.1%) in the three groups. CONCLUSION(S): All three ovarian stimulation protocols were observed to be equally effective. These results demonstrate that ovarian stimulation can be commenced on any day of the menstrual cycle. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR-OPN-15007332.
Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  controlled ovarian stimulation; flexible start for ovarian stimulation; frozen embryo transfer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27114329     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  14 in total

1.  How effective are the non-conventional ovarian stimulation protocols in ART? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Demian Glujovsky; Romina Pesce; Mariana Miguens; Carlos E Sueldo; Karinna Lattes; Agustín Ciapponi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Effect of Progestin-primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol on Outcomes of Aged Infertile Women Who Failed to Get Pregnant in the First IVF/ ICSI Cycle: A Self-controlled Study.

Authors:  Yin-Mei Chen; Qian-Rong Qi; Qing-Zhen Xie; Yi-Fan Yang; Yi Xia; Xiao-Dan Zhou
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2018-06-22

Review 3.  Fertility preservation for genetic diseases leading to premature ovarian insufficiency (POI).

Authors:  Antonio La Marca; Elisa Mastellari
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  ART outcomes following ovarian stimulation in the luteal phase:a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Buo-Jia Lu; Chien-Ju Lin; Bou-Zenn Lin; Li Huang; Li-Ting Chien; Chi-Huang Chen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 3.357

5.  Effect of Frozen Embryo Transfer and Progestin-primed Ovary Stimulation on IVF outcomes in women with high body mass index.

Authors:  Li Wang; Mingru Yin; Yali Liu; Qiuju Chen; Yun Wang; Ai Ai; Yonglun Fu; Zhiguang Yan; Wei Jin; Hui Long; Qifeng Lyu; Yanping Kuang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Late Follicular Phase Ovarian Stimulation Without Exogenous Pituitary Modulators.

Authors:  Xiuxian Zhu; Jing Ye; Yonglun Fu
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 5.555

7.  Extensive monitoring of the natural menstrual cycle using the serum biomarkers estradiol, luteinizing hormone and progesterone.

Authors:  Ellen Anckaert; Alexander Jank; Julia Petzold; Felix Rohsmann; Rhonda Paris; Martin Renggli; Kathrin Schönfeld; Johan Schiettecatte; Monika Kriner
Journal:  Pract Lab Med       Date:  2021-03-13

8.  Microdissection testicular sperm extraction in five Japanese patients with non-mosaic Klinefelter's syndrome.

Authors:  Makoto Chihara; Kanna Ogi; Tatsuya Ishiguro; Kunihiko Yoshida; Chikako Godo; Koichi Takakuwa; Takayuki Enomoto
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2018-03-08

9.  Comparison Between PPOS and GnRHa-Long Protocol in Clinical Outcome with the First IVF/ICSI Cycle: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Qianwen Xi; Yu Tao; Meiting Qiu; Yun Wang; Yanping Kuang
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 4.790

10.  Borderline form of empty follicle syndrome treated with a novel dual trigger method combined with delayed oocyte retrieval: A case report.

Authors:  Xian-Ling Cao; Zhen-Gao Sun
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 1.337

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.