Lars H Markvardsen1, Michael Vaeggemose2,3, Steffen Ringgaard3, Henning Andersen2. 1. Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Noerrebrogade 44, DK-8000, Aarhus C, Denmark. larsmark@rm.dk. 2. Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Noerrebrogade 44, DK-8000, Aarhus C, Denmark. 3. Department of Diagnostic Imaging: MR Research Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) has shown that fractional anisotropy (FA) is lower in peripheral nerves in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). We examined whether DTI correlates to muscle strength or impairment. METHODS: MRI of sciatic and tibial nerves was performed on 3-T MR scanner by obtaining T2- and DTI-weighted sequences with fat saturation. On each slice of T2-weighted (T2w) and DTI, the tibial and sciatic nerves were segmented and served for calculation of signal intensity. On DTI images, pixel-by-pixel calculation of FA and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was done. Muscle strength at knee and ankle was determined by isokinetic dynamometry and severity of CIDP by neuropathy impairment score (NIS). RESULTS: Fourteen CIDP patients treated with subcutaneous immunoglobulin were compared to gender- and age-matched controls. T2w values expressed as a nerve/muscle ratio (nT2w) were unchanged in CIDP versus controls 0.93 ± 0.21 versus 1.02 ± 0.21 (P = 0.10). FA values were lower in CIDP compared to controls 0.38 ± 0.07 versus 0.45 ± 0.05 (P < 0.0001), and ADC values were higher in CIDP versus controls 1735 ± 232 versus 1593 ± 116 × 10(-6) mm(2)/s (P = 0.005). In CIDP, FA values correlated to clinical impairment (NIS) (r = -0.57, P = 0.03), but not to muscle strength. FA value in the sciatic nerve distinguishes CIDP from controls with a sensitivity and a specificity of 92.9 %. CONCLUSION: CIDP patients have unchanged nT2w values, lower FA values, and higher ADC values of sciatic and tibial nerves compared to controls. FA values correlated to NIS but were unrelated to muscle strength. DTI of sciatic nerves seems promising to differentiate CIDP from controls.
INTRODUCTION: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) has shown that fractional anisotropy (FA) is lower in peripheral nerves in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). We examined whether DTI correlates to muscle strength or impairment. METHODS: MRI of sciatic and tibial nerves was performed on 3-T MR scanner by obtaining T2- and DTI-weighted sequences with fat saturation. On each slice of T2-weighted (T2w) and DTI, the tibial and sciatic nerves were segmented and served for calculation of signal intensity. On DTI images, pixel-by-pixel calculation of FA and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was done. Muscle strength at knee and ankle was determined by isokinetic dynamometry and severity of CIDP by neuropathy impairment score (NIS). RESULTS: Fourteen CIDPpatients treated with subcutaneous immunoglobulin were compared to gender- and age-matched controls. T2w values expressed as a nerve/muscle ratio (nT2w) were unchanged in CIDP versus controls 0.93 ± 0.21 versus 1.02 ± 0.21 (P = 0.10). FA values were lower in CIDP compared to controls 0.38 ± 0.07 versus 0.45 ± 0.05 (P < 0.0001), and ADC values were higher in CIDP versus controls 1735 ± 232 versus 1593 ± 116 × 10(-6) mm(2)/s (P = 0.005). In CIDP, FA values correlated to clinical impairment (NIS) (r = -0.57, P = 0.03), but not to muscle strength. FA value in the sciatic nerve distinguishes CIDP from controls with a sensitivity and a specificity of 92.9 %. CONCLUSION:CIDPpatients have unchanged nT2w values, lower FA values, and higher ADC values of sciatic and tibial nerves compared to controls. FA values correlated to NIS but were unrelated to muscle strength. DTI of sciatic nerves seems promising to differentiate CIDP from controls.
Authors: Philipp Bäumer; Mirko Pham; Maurice Ruetters; Sabine Heiland; Andreas Heckel; Alexander Radbruch; Martin Bendszus; Markus Weiler Journal: Radiology Date: 2014-05-17 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Lloyd J Bradley; Thomas Wilhelm; Rosalind H M King; Lionel Ginsberg; Richard W Orrell Journal: Neuromuscul Disord Date: 2006-01-19 Impact factor: 4.296
Authors: Neil G Simon; Jim Lagopoulos; Sita Paling; Casey Pfluger; Susanna B Park; James Howells; Thomas Gallagher; Michel Kliot; Robert D Henderson; Steve Vucic; Matthew C Kiernan Journal: J Neurol Date: 2017-03-06 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Fabian Preisner; Rouven Behnisch; Véronique Schwehr; Tim Godel; Daniel Schwarz; Olivia Foesleitner; Philipp Bäumer; Sabine Heiland; Martin Bendszus; Moritz Kronlage Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2022-02-16 Impact factor: 4.677
Authors: Thorsten Lichtenstein; Alina Sprenger; Kilian Weiss; Karin Slebocki; Barbara Cervantes; Dimitrios Karampinos; David Maintz; Gereon R Fink; Tobias D Henning; Helmar C Lehmann Journal: Ann Clin Transl Neurol Date: 2017-12-04 Impact factor: 4.511
Authors: Jos Oudeman; Camiel Verhamme; Maurits P Engbersen; Mattan W A Caan; Mario Maas; Martijn Froeling; Aart J Nederveen; Gustav J Strijkers Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-05-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Barbara Cervantes; Anh T Van; Dominik Weidlich; Hendrick Kooijman; Andreas Hock; Ernst J Rummeny; Alexandra Gersing; Jan S Kirschke; Dimitrios C Karampinos Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-01-29 Impact factor: 4.668