Karlijn H J Groenen1, Martin H Pouw2, Gerjon Hannink3, Allard J F Hosman4, Yvette M van der Linden5, Nico Verdonschot6, Esther Tanck7. 1. Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Electronic address: Karlijn.Groenen@radboudumc.nl. 2. Radboud university medical center, Department of Orthopaedics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Electronic address: Martin.Pouw@radboudumc.nl. 3. Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Electronic address: Gerjon.Hannink@radboudumc.nl. 4. Radboud university medical center, Department of Orthopaedics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Electronic address: Allard.Hosman@radboudumc.nl. 5. Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden, The Netherlands. Electronic address: ymvanderlinden@lumc.nl. 6. Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; University of Twente, Laboratory for Biomechanical Engineering, Enschede, The Netherlands. Electronic address: Nico.Verdonschot@radboudumc.nl. 7. Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Electronic address: Esther.Tanck@radboudumc.nl.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The role of radiotherapy in stabilizing metastatic bones is unclear. This systematic review assessed the effects of (1) radiotherapy, (2) radiotherapy combined with bisphosphonates, and (3) radiotherapy combined with RANK ligand (RANKL) inhibitors on bone quality and bone strength in bone metastases originating from solid tumors. METHODS: Pubmed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched. Any type of study design and type and dose of radiotherapy, bisphosphonates and RANKL inhibitors were allowed. RESULTS: 39 articles were identified. Animal studies showed that radiotherapy had similar effects on bone quality and strength as receiving no treatment, whereas adding bisphosphonates to radiotherapy restored bone quality and strength. In patient studies, bone density increased after radiotherapy and radiotherapy combined with bisphosphonates. However, due to the often non-optimal study design and study quality, it was unclear whether this increase could be attributed to these treatments. There was insufficient evidence to assess the additional effect of bisphosphonates or RANKL inhibitors. CONCLUSION: Despite the clinical experience that radiotherapy is an effective treatment for bone metastases, there was no sufficient evidence for a positive effect on bone quality and fracture risk. Animal studies showed that adding bisphosphonates to radiotherapy restored bone quality and strength, whereas this was not proven in patients. There were no studies addressing the adjunct effect of RANKL inhibitors to radiotherapy. Although associated with several methodological, practical and ethical challenges, randomized controlled trials are needed.
PURPOSE: The role of radiotherapy in stabilizing metastatic bones is unclear. This systematic review assessed the effects of (1) radiotherapy, (2) radiotherapy combined with bisphosphonates, and (3) radiotherapy combined with RANK ligand (RANKL) inhibitors on bone quality and bone strength in bone metastases originating from solid tumors. METHODS: Pubmed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched. Any type of study design and type and dose of radiotherapy, bisphosphonates and RANKL inhibitors were allowed. RESULTS: 39 articles were identified. Animal studies showed that radiotherapy had similar effects on bone quality and strength as receiving no treatment, whereas adding bisphosphonates to radiotherapy restored bone quality and strength. In patient studies, bone density increased after radiotherapy and radiotherapy combined with bisphosphonates. However, due to the often non-optimal study design and study quality, it was unclear whether this increase could be attributed to these treatments. There was insufficient evidence to assess the additional effect of bisphosphonates or RANKL inhibitors. CONCLUSION: Despite the clinical experience that radiotherapy is an effective treatment for bone metastases, there was no sufficient evidence for a positive effect on bone quality and fracture risk. Animal studies showed that adding bisphosphonates to radiotherapy restored bone quality and strength, whereas this was not proven in patients. There were no studies addressing the adjunct effect of RANKL inhibitors to radiotherapy. Although associated with several methodological, practical and ethical challenges, randomized controlled trials are needed.
Authors: Samuel Rosas; T David Luo; Alexander H Jinnah; Alejandro Marquez-Lara; Martin W Roche; Cynthia L Emory Journal: J Knee Surg Date: 2018-04-04 Impact factor: 2.757
Authors: Florieke Eggermont; Loes C Derikx; Nico Verdonschot; Gerjon Hannink; Robert S J P Kaatee; Esther Tanck; Yvette M van der Linden Journal: Adv Radiat Oncol Date: 2016-11-10
Authors: Alexander Rühle; Verlaine Ange Nya Yompang; Simon K B Spohn; Raluca Stoian; Constantinos Zamboglou; Eleni Gkika; Anca-Ligia Grosu; Nils H Nicolay; Tanja Sprave Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2022-09-07 Impact factor: 4.309
Authors: Tanja Sprave; Vivek Verma; Robert Förster; Ingmar Schlampp; Katharina Hees; Thomas Bruckner; Tilman Bostel; Rami Ateyah El Shafie; Thomas Welzel; Nils Henrik Nicolay; Jürgen Debus; Harald Rief Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2018-10-30 Impact factor: 3.481