Literature DB >> 27113732

Neural Representations of Physics Concepts.

Robert A Mason1, Marcel Adam Just2.   

Abstract

We used functional MRI (fMRI) to assess neural representations of physics concepts (momentum, energy, etc.) in juniors, seniors, and graduate students majoring in physics or engineering. Our goal was to identify the underlying neural dimensions of these representations. Using factor analysis to reduce the number of dimensions of activation, we obtained four physics-related factors that were mapped to sets of voxels. The four factors were interpretable as causal motion visualization, periodicity, algebraic form, and energy flow. The individual concepts were identifiable from their fMRI signatures with a mean rank accuracy of .75 using a machine-learning (multivoxel) classifier. Furthermore, there was commonality in participants' neural representation of physics; a classifier trained on data from all but one participant identified the concepts in the left-out participant (mean accuracy = .71 across all nine participant samples). The findings indicate that abstract scientific concepts acquired in an educational setting evoke activation patterns that are identifiable and common, indicating that science education builds abstract knowledge using inherent, repurposed brain systems.
© The Author(s) 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fMRI; neural representations; physics semantics; scientific concepts

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27113732     DOI: 10.1177/0956797616641941

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  19 in total

1.  Reply to: Towards increasing the clinical applicability of machine learning biomarkers in psychiatry.

Authors:  Marcel Adam Just; Vladimir L Cherkassky; David Brent
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2021-04-05

2.  Predicting the brain activation pattern associated with the propositional content of a sentence: Modeling neural representations of events and states.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Vladimir L Cherkassky; Marcel Adam Just
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  A Peircean account of concepts: grounding abstraction in phylogeny through a comparative neuroscientific perspective.

Authors:  Valentina Cuccio; Vittorio Gallese
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Ethical Analysis of "Mind Reading" or "Neurotechnological Thought Apprehension": Keeping Potential Limitations in Mind.

Authors:  Peter Zuk; Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz
Journal:  AJOB Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-09

5.  Functional neuroanatomy of intuitive physical inference.

Authors:  Jason Fischer; John G Mikhael; Joshua B Tenenbaum; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Neural representations of the concepts in simple sentences: Concept activation prediction and context effects.

Authors:  Marcel Adam Just; Jing Wang; Vladimir L Cherkassky
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 7.  Cortical circuits for mathematical knowledge: evidence for a major subdivision within the brain's semantic networks.

Authors:  Marie Amalric; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-02-19       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Invariant representation of physical stability in the human brain.

Authors:  R T Pramod; Michael A Cohen; Joshua B Tenenbaum; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 8.713

9.  Brain reading and behavioral methods provide complementary perspectives on the representation of concepts.

Authors:  Andrew James Bauer; Marcel Adam Just
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 10.  Grounded understanding of abstract concepts: The case of STEM learning.

Authors:  Justin C Hayes; David J M Kraemer
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2017-01-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.