| Literature DB >> 27113609 |
Abstract
This commentary discusses regulatory options for addressing electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS)-related overheating, fire or explosion events in the USA. Currently, ENDS fall into a regulatory void, leaving customers unprotected from shoddy manufacturing and malfunctioning batteries. However, given the much greater harm caused by conventional tobacco products, efforts to address injuries caused by malfunctioning ENDS should not derail progress on tobacco control measures that are likely to have a much larger public health impact. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.Entities:
Keywords: Electronic nicotine delivery devices; Litigation; Public policy
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27113609 DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-052985
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Tob Control ISSN: 0964-4563 Impact factor: 7.552