Literature DB >> 27113340

Modern contaminants affecting microscopic residue analysis on stone tools: A word of caution.

A Pedergnana1, L Asryan2, J L Fernández-Marchena3, A Ollé2.   

Abstract

Residue analysis is a method frequently used to infer the function of stone tools and it is very often applied in combination with use-wear analysis. Beyond its undeniable potential, the method itself has several intrinsic constraints. Apart from the exceptional circumstances necessary for residues to survive, the correct identification of the residue type is a very debatable topic. Before attempting to recognise ancient residues, a proper method should allow analysts to identify possible modern contaminants and exclude them from the final interpretation. Therefore, analysts should not underestimate the presence of modern contaminants and might learn how to discriminate the background noise due to handling. The main aim of this research is to provide some methodological improvements to residue analysis through the characterisation of some modern residues often present on the surface of stone tools (e.g. skin flakes, modelling clay). This characterisation was done by using both optical light microscopy (OLM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Finally, a special care in the post-excavation treatment of stone tools is claimed in order to avoid major contamination of the samples.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Micro-residue analysis; Optical light microscopy; Sample contamination; Scanning electron microscopy

Year:  2016        PMID: 27113340     DOI: 10.1016/j.micron.2016.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Micron        ISSN: 0968-4328            Impact factor:   2.251


  4 in total

1.  Innovative ochre processing and tool use in China 40,000 years ago.

Authors:  Fa-Gang Wang; Shi-Xia Yang; Jun-Yi Ge; Andreu Ollé; Ke-Liang Zhao; Jian-Ping Yue; Daniela Eugenia Rosso; Katerina Douka; Ying Guan; Wen-Yan Li; Hai-Yong Yang; Lian-Qiang Liu; Fei Xie; Zheng-Tang Guo; Ri-Xiang Zhu; Cheng-Long Deng; Francesco d'Errico; Michael Petraglia
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  An integrated study discloses chopping tools use from Late Acheulean Revadim (Israel).

Authors:  Flavia Venditti; Aviad Agam; Jacopo Tirillò; Stella Nunziante-Cesaro; Ran Barkai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Microbotanical residues for the study of early hominin tools.

Authors:  Julio Mercader; María Soto; Andreu Ollé; George Belev; Pastory Bushozi; Siobhán Clarke; Julien Favreau; Makarius Itambu; Zhu Jianfeng; Samson Koromo; Fergus Larter; Patrick Lee; Jason Maley; Juan Luis Fernández-Marchena; Abdallah Mohamed; Aloyce Mwambwiga; Benja Ngisaruni; Meshack Kingi; Lucas Olesilau; Robert Patalano; Antonella Pedergnana; Ramaswami Sammynaiken; Joakim Siljedal; Laura Tucker; Dale Walde
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Every contact leaves a trace: Documenting contamination in lithic residue studies at the Middle Palaeolithic sites of Lusakert Cave 1 (Armenia) and Crvena Stijena (Montenegro).

Authors:  Ellery Frahm; Daniel S Adler; Boris Gasparyan; Bing Luo; Carolina Mallol; Goran Pajović; Gilbert B Tostevin; Benik Yeritsyan; Gilliane Monnier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.