Literature DB >> 27113228

Switching from a Free Association of Perindopril/Amlodipine to a Fixed-Dose Combination: Increased Antihypertensive Efficacy and Tolerability.

Katarina Hatalova1,2, Daniel Pella3,4, Rastislav Sidlo5, Robert Hatala6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although single-pill, fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) are widely endorsed for the reduction of blood pressure and cardiovascular risk, studies to date have not evaluated the differences between FDCs and free associations using matched drugs and doses. The objective of this study was to determine whether switching from a free association of perindopril/amlodipine to the FDC formulation led to significant improvements in efficacy and tolerability.
METHODS: In this subanalysis of the previously published SYMBIO study, we looked at the effect of switching patients from a free association of perindopril/amlodipine to an equivalent dose of FDC (N = 335). In the SYMBIO study, concomitant antihypertensive medications were allowed; however, they remained unchanged till the end of the study. Blood pressure was measured at baseline, 1, and 3 months. Targets were defined as blood pressure <140/90 mmHg or <130/80 mmHg for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus or at high cardiovascular risk.
RESULTS: Compared to baseline, mean blood pressure decreased significantly after 1 and 3 months of treatment with FDC perindopril/amlodipine. Mean changes from baseline were -15.6 ± 14.3/-7.7 ± 9.1 mmHg at 1 month (p < 0.0001) and -23.3 ± 16.4/-11.3 ± 9.8 mmHg at 3 months (p < 0.0001). The percentage of patients who reached their blood pressure target increased from 16.0 % at baseline to 50.6 % at 1 month, to 75.9 % at 3 months. The incidence of ankle edema decreased from 14.9 % at baseline, to 9.9 % at 1 month, to 5.4 % at 3 months. The relative risk reduction for ankle edema was -37.5 % at 1 month (vs. baseline; p < 0.001) and -57.2 % at 3 months (vs. baseline; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that switching from a free association of perindopril/amlodipine to the same dose of the FDC formulation led to significant improvements in efficacy and tolerability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27113228     DOI: 10.1007/s40261-016-0404-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Drug Investig        ISSN: 1173-2563            Impact factor:   2.859


  34 in total

1.  Fixed-dose combinations improve medication compliance: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sripal Bangalore; Gayathri Kamalakkannan; Sanobar Parkar; Franz H Messerli
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.965

2.  Prevention of stroke and myocardial infarction by amlodipine and Angiotensin receptor blockers: a quantitative overview.

Authors:  Ji-Guang Wang; Yan Li; Stanley S Franklin; Michel Safar
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2007-05-14       Impact factor: 10.190

3.  Initial combination therapy reduces the risk of cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients: a matched cohort study.

Authors:  Alan H Gradman; Hélène Parisé; Patrick Lefebvre; Heather Falvey; Marie-Hélène Lafeuille; Mei Sheng Duh
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 10.190

4.  The pharmacokinetics of amlodipine in healthy volunteers after single intravenous and oral doses and after 14 repeated oral doses given once daily.

Authors:  J K Faulkner; D McGibney; L F Chasseaud; J L Perry; I W Taylor
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition with perindopril on left ventricular remodeling and clinical outcome: results of the randomized Perindopril and Remodeling in Elderly with Acute Myocardial Infarction (PREAMI) Study.

Authors:  Roberto Ferrari
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-03-27

6.  Amlodipine, a long-acting calcium channel blocker, attenuates morning blood pressure rise in hypertensive patients.

Authors:  T Ishimitsu; J Minami; Y Kawano; A Numabe; S Takishita; H Matsuoka
Journal:  Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.557

7.  Optimizing adherence in hypertension: a comparison of outcomes and costs using single tablet regimens vs individual component regimens.

Authors:  J D Belsey
Journal:  J Med Econ       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 2.448

8.  Comparison of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral doses of perindopril in normotensive Chinese and Caucasian volunteers.

Authors:  P J Anderson; J A Critchley; B Tomlinson; G Resplandy
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Perindopril for control of blood pressure in patients with hypertension and other cardiovascular risk factors: an open-label, observational, multicentre, general practice-based study.

Authors:  Richard Ian Ogilvie; Sanjiv Anand; Pierre Roy; Selwyn De Souza
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.859

10.  Long-term efficacy of amlodipine in patients with severe coronary artery disease.

Authors:  J L Navarro Estrada; R Oliveri
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.105

View more
  1 in total

1.  A retrospective study of treatment persistence and adherence to α-blocker plus antimuscarinic combination therapies, in men with LUTS/BPH in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Marcus J Drake; Sally Bowditch; Emilio Arbe; Zalmai Hakimi; Florent Guelfucci; Ikbel Amri; Jameel Nazir
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 2.264

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.