Rieko Yamada1, Koichi Maruyama2, Go Hirabayashi1, Yukihide Koyama3, Tomio Andoh1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Mizonokuchi, Teikyo University School of Medicine, 3-8-3 Mizonokuchi, Takatsu-ku, Kawasaki, 213-8507, Kanagawa, Japan. 2. Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Mizonokuchi, Teikyo University School of Medicine, 3-8-3 Mizonokuchi, Takatsu-ku, Kawasaki, 213-8507, Kanagawa, Japan. Electronic address: maru555md@yahoo.co.jp. 3. Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Kanagawa, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effect of head position on the performance of intubating supraglottic airway devices, we compared the success rate of blind intubation in the head-elevated and the pillowless head positions with the LMA Fastrach and the air-Q, and the change of glottic visualization through the air-Q. METHODS: We assigned 193 patients to two groups according to the device used and subgrouped by head position used for intubation: Fastrach/pillowless, Fastrach/head-elevated, air-Q/pillowless, and air-Q/head-elevated. Blind intubation through the Fastrach or the air-Q was attempted up to twice after induction of general anesthesia. Before the attempt at blind intubation with the air-Q, the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score was also fiberscopically evaluated at the outlet of the device in both head positions in a cross-over fashion. RESULTS: The Fastrach significantly facilitated blind intubation compared with the air-Q in both the pillowless and head-elevated positions: 87.2% in Fastrach/pillowless vs 65.9% in air-Q/pillowless (P=.048), 90% in Fastrach/head-elevated vs 53.7% in air-Q/head-elevated (P<.001). The head-elevated position did not significantly affect the success rate of blind intubation for either device (P=.97 in Fastrach, P=.37 in air-Q). Although the head-elevated position significantly improved the POGO score from the median (10-90 percentile) 60% (0-100%) in the pillowless position to 80% (0-100%) (P=.008), it did not contribute to successful blind intubation with the air-Q. CONCLUSION: Although the head-elevated position improved glottic visualization in the air-Q, the head position had minimal influence on the success rate of blind intubation with either the Fastrach or the air-Q.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effect of head position on the performance of intubating supraglottic airway devices, we compared the success rate of blind intubation in the head-elevated and the pillowless head positions with the LMA Fastrach and the air-Q, and the change of glottic visualization through the air-Q. METHODS: We assigned 193 patients to two groups according to the device used and subgrouped by head position used for intubation: Fastrach/pillowless, Fastrach/head-elevated, air-Q/pillowless, and air-Q/head-elevated. Blind intubation through the Fastrach or the air-Q was attempted up to twice after induction of general anesthesia. Before the attempt at blind intubation with the air-Q, the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score was also fiberscopically evaluated at the outlet of the device in both head positions in a cross-over fashion. RESULTS: The Fastrach significantly facilitated blind intubation compared with the air-Q in both the pillowless and head-elevated positions: 87.2% in Fastrach/pillowless vs 65.9% in air-Q/pillowless (P=.048), 90% in Fastrach/head-elevated vs 53.7% in air-Q/head-elevated (P<.001). The head-elevated position did not significantly affect the success rate of blind intubation for either device (P=.97 in Fastrach, P=.37 in air-Q). Although the head-elevated position significantly improved the POGO score from the median (10-90 percentile) 60% (0-100%) in the pillowless position to 80% (0-100%) (P=.008), it did not contribute to successful blind intubation with the air-Q. CONCLUSION: Although the head-elevated position improved glottic visualization in the air-Q, the head position had minimal influence on the success rate of blind intubation with either the Fastrach or the air-Q.