Literature DB >> 2711246

A comparison of actual and apparent lumbar lordosis in black and white adult females.

E A Mosner1, J M Bryan, M A Stull, R Shippee.   

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to investigate differences in lumbar lordosis in black and white adult females and to explain the clinical impression that blacks have a greater lordosis than whites. An actual lumbosacral lordosis angle (ALS) was measured from a standing right lateral lumbosacral radiograph using the angle formed from the intersection of lines drawn across the top of the second lumbar vertebral body (L2) and across the top of the sacrum. An actual lumbo-lumbar angle (ALL) was measured in the same manner, except the second line was drawn across the bottom of the fifth vertebral body (L5). To determine whether gluteal prominence gives a false impression of increased lumbar lordosis, an apparent lordosis (APL) measurement was taken, measuring the distance from the subject's greater trochanter to the most posterior aspect of the buttocks. No significant differences were found in ALS or ALL between 25 black and 27 white adult female subjects (ALS, P = 0.26; ALL, P = 0.41). Significant differences were found between black and white APL, with blacks demonstrating a larger APL than whites (P less than 0.01). A high correlation was noted between ALS and ALL in both blacks (0.70, P less than 0.01) and whites (0.77, P less than 0.01). The investigators therefore contend that the clinician's assumption that blacks have a greater lordosis than whites is based on an apparent increased lordosis due to more prominent buttocks (APL).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2711246     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198903000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  7 in total

1.  Pelvic incidence: an anatomic investigation of 880 cadaveric specimens.

Authors:  Douglas S Weinberg; William Z Morris; Jeremy J Gebhart; Raymond W Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Evidence-based protocol for structural rehabilitation of the spine and posture: review of clinical biomechanics of posture (CBP) publications.

Authors:  Paul A Oakley; Donald D Harrison; Deed E Harrison; Jason W Haas
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2005-12

3.  The effect of high-heeled shoes on lumbar lordosis: a narrative review and discussion of the disconnect between Internet content and peer-reviewed literature.

Authors:  Brent S Russell
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2010-10-14

4.  Comparison of Four Radiographic Angular Measures of Lumbar Lordosis.

Authors:  Francis Osita Okpala
Journal:  J Neurosci Rural Pract       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

5.  Risk factors of low back pain and the relationship with sagittal vertebral alignment in Tanzania.

Authors:  Masataka Tatsumi; Egfrid Michael Mkoba; Yusuke Suzuki; Yuu Kajiwara; Hala Zeidan; Keiko Harada; Tsubasa Bitoh; Yuichi Nishida; Kengo Nakai; Kanako Shimoura; Tomoki Aoyama
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Correlation between lumbar lordosis angle and degree of gynoid lipodystrophy (cellulite) in asymptomatic women.

Authors:  Giovana Barbosa Milani; A'Dayr Natal Filho; Sílvia Maria Amado João
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 7.  Comparing lumbo-pelvic kinematics in people with and without back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Robert A Laird; Jayce Gilbert; Peter Kent; Jennifer L Keating
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 2.362

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.