Literature DB >> 27112047

Effect of intra-operative high inspired oxygen fraction on surgical site infection: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

W Yang1, Y Liu2, Y Zhang1, Q-H Zhao3, S-F He4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection (SSI) causes significant mortality and morbidity. Administration of a high inspired oxygen fraction (FiO2) to patients undergoing surgery may represent a potential preventive strategy. AIM: To conduct a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in which high FiO2 was compared with normal FiO2 in patients undergoing surgery to estimate the effect on the development of SSI.
METHODS: A comprehensive search was undertaken for randomized controlled trials (until December 2015) that compared high FiO2 with normal FiO2 in adults undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia and reported on SSI.
FINDINGS: This study included 17 randomized controlled trials with 8093 patients. Infection rates were 13.11% in the control group and 11.53% in the hyperoxic group, while the overall risk ratio was 0.893 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.794-1.003; P = 0.057]. Subgroup analyses stratified by country, definition of SSI, and type of surgery were also performed, and showed similar results. However, high FiO2 was found to be of significant benefit in patients undergoing colorectal surgery, with a risk ratio of 0.735 (95% CI 0.573-0.944; P=0.016).
CONCLUSIONS: There is moderate evidence to suggest that administration of high FiO2 to patients undergoing surgery, especially colorectal surgery, reduces the risk of SSI. Further studies with better adherence to the intervention may affect the results of this meta-analysis.
Copyright © 2016 The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intra-operative high inspired oxygen; Meta-analysis; Randomized controlled trials; Surgical site infection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27112047     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2016.03.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Infect        ISSN: 0195-6701            Impact factor:   3.926


  6 in total

1.  WHO Needs High FIO2?

Authors:  Ozan Akca; Lorenzo Ball; F Javier Belda; Peter Biro; Andrea Cortegiani; Arieh Eden; Carlos Ferrando; Luciano Gattinoni; Zeev Goldik; Cesare Gregoretti; Thomas Hachenberg; Göran Hedenstierna; Harriet W Hopf; Thomas K Hunt; Paolo Pelosi; Motaz Qadan; Daniel I Sessler; Marina Soro; Mert Şentürk
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2017-08-01

2.  Oxidative Stress Markers to Investigate the Effects of Hyperoxia in Anesthesia.

Authors:  Sara Ottolenghi; Federico Maria Rubino; Giovanni Sabbatini; Silvia Coppola; Alice Veronese; Davide Chiumello; Rita Paroni
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 3.  Target arterial PO2 according to the underlying pathology: a mini-review of the available data in mechanically ventilated patients.

Authors:  Julien Demiselle; Enrico Calzia; Clair Hartmann; David Alexander Christian Messerer; Pierre Asfar; Peter Radermacher; Thomas Datzmann
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 6.925

4.  Does hyperoxia enhance susceptibility to secondary pulmonary infection in the ICU?

Authors:  Benedikt Nußbaum; Peter Radermacher; Pierre Asfar; Clair Hartmann
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Increased visceral tissue perfusion with heated, humidified carbon dioxide insufflation during open abdominal surgery in a rodent model.

Authors:  Jonathan P Robson; Pavlo Kokhanenko; Jean K Marshall; Anthony R Phillips; Jan van der Linden
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  What are the optimum components in a care bundle aimed at reducing post-operative pulmonary complications in high-risk patients?

Authors:  Sophie V Griffiths; Daniel H Conway; Michael Sander; Ib Jammer; Michael P W Grocott; Ben C Creagh-Brown
Journal:  Perioper Med (Lond)       Date:  2018-04-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.