Literature DB >> 27111841

The Aurora-B-dependent NoCut checkpoint prevents damage of anaphase bridges after DNA replication stress.

Nuno Amaral1,2, Alexandre Vendrell1,2, Charlotta Funaya3, Fatima-Zahra Idrissi4, Michael Maier1,2, Arun Kumar1,2, Gabriel Neurohr1, Neus Colomina5, Jordi Torres-Rosell5, María-Isabel Geli3, Manuel Mendoza1,2.   

Abstract

Anaphase chromatin bridges can lead to chromosome breakage if not properly resolved before completion of cytokinesis. The NoCut checkpoint, which depends on Aurora B at the spindle midzone, delays abscission in response to chromosome segregation defects in yeast and animal cells. How chromatin bridges are detected, and whether abscission inhibition prevents their damage, remain key unresolved questions. We find that bridges induced by DNA replication stress and by condensation or decatenation defects, but not dicentric chromosomes, delay abscission in a NoCut-dependent manner. Decatenation and condensation defects lead to spindle stabilization during cytokinesis, allowing bridge detection by Aurora B. NoCut does not prevent DNA damage following condensin or topoisomerase II inactivation; however, it protects anaphase bridges and promotes cellular viability after replication stress. Therefore, the molecular origin of chromatin bridges is critical for activation of NoCut, which plays a key role in the maintenance of genome stability after replicative stress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27111841     DOI: 10.1038/ncb3343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Cell Biol        ISSN: 1465-7392            Impact factor:   28.824


  45 in total

1.  Nuclear envelope fission is linked to cytokinesis in budding yeast.

Authors:  J Lippincott; R Li
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 3.905

2.  The NoCut pathway links completion of cytokinesis to spindle midzone function to prevent chromosome breakage.

Authors:  Caren Norden; Manuel Mendoza; Jeroen Dobbelaere; Chitra V Kotwaliwale; Sue Biggins; Yves Barral
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2006-04-07       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Identification of a mid-anaphase checkpoint in budding yeast.

Authors:  S S Yang; E Yeh; E D Salmon; K Bloom
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1997-01-27       Impact factor: 10.539

4.  A versatile toolbox for PCR-based tagging of yeast genes: new fluorescent proteins, more markers and promoter substitution cassettes.

Authors:  Carsten Janke; Maria M Magiera; Nicole Rathfelder; Christof Taxis; Simone Reber; Hiromi Maekawa; Alexandra Moreno-Borchart; Georg Doenges; Etienne Schwob; Elmar Schiebel; Michael Knop
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.239

5.  Aurora B-mediated abscission checkpoint protects against tetraploidization.

Authors:  Patrick Steigemann; Claudia Wurzenberger; Michael H A Schmitz; Michael Held; Julien Guizetti; Sandra Maar; Daniel W Gerlich
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  A mechanism for chromosome segregation sensing by the NoCut checkpoint.

Authors:  Manuel Mendoza; Caren Norden; Kathrin Durrer; Harald Rauter; Frank Uhlmann; Yves Barral
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2009-03-08       Impact factor: 28.824

7.  BLM is required for faithful chromosome segregation and its localization defines a class of ultrafine anaphase bridges.

Authors:  Kok-Lung Chan; Phillip S North; Ian D Hickson
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Separase regulates INCENP-Aurora B anaphase spindle function through Cdc14.

Authors:  Gislene Pereira; Elmar Schiebel
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-11-06       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  A suppressor of two essential checkpoint genes identifies a novel protein that negatively affects dNTP pools.

Authors:  X Zhao; E G Muller; R Rothstein
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 17.970

10.  Replication stress links structural and numerical cancer chromosomal instability.

Authors:  Rebecca A Burrell; Sarah E McClelland; David Endesfelder; Petra Groth; Marie-Christine Weller; Nadeem Shaikh; Enric Domingo; Nnennaya Kanu; Sally M Dewhurst; Eva Gronroos; Su Kit Chew; Andrew J Rowan; Arne Schenk; Michal Sheffer; Michael Howell; Maik Kschischo; Axel Behrens; Thomas Helleday; Jiri Bartek; Ian P Tomlinson; Charles Swanton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  Building bridges between chromosomes: novel insights into the abscission checkpoint.

Authors:  Eleni Petsalaki; George Zachos
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 9.261

2.  Actin reduction by MsrB2 is a key component of the cytokinetic abscission checkpoint and prevents tetraploidy.

Authors:  Jian Bai; Hugo Wioland; Tamara Advedissian; Frédérique Cuvelier; Guillaume Romet-Lemonne; Arnaud Echard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  DNA replication stress: NoCut to the rescue.

Authors:  Nuno Amaral; Nicola Brownlow; Manuel Mendoza
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  Comprehensive analysis of the human ESCRT-III-MIT domain interactome reveals new cofactors for cytokinetic abscission.

Authors:  Dawn M Wenzel; Douglas R Mackay; Jack J Skalicky; Elliott L Paine; Matthew S Miller; Katharine S Ullman; Wesley I Sundquist
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 8.713

5.  Targeting Mechanisms of the DNA Damage Response (DDR) and DNA Repair by Natural Compounds to Improve cAT-Triggered Tumor Cell Death.

Authors:  Jana Aengenvoort; Marlena Sekeres; Peter Proksch; Gerhard Fritz
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.927

6.  Genome-Scale Genetic Interactions and Cell Imaging Confirm Cytokinesis as Deleterious to Transient Topoisomerase II Deficiency in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Cristina Ramos-Pérez; Jessel Ayra-Plasencia; Emiliano Matos-Perdomo; Michael Lisby; Grant W Brown; Félix Machín
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 3.154

Review 7.  Rescue from replication stress during mitosis.

Authors:  Michalis Fragkos; Valeria Naim
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 4.534

8.  Topoisomerase II deficiency leads to a postreplicative structural shift in all Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosomes.

Authors:  Jessel Ayra-Plasencia; Cristina Ramos-Pérez; Silvia Santana-Sosa; Oliver Quevedo; Sara Medina-Suárez; Emiliano Matos-Perdomo; Marcos Zamora-Dorta; Grant W Brown; Michael Lisby; Félix Machín
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Scaling Laws for Mitotic Chromosomes.

Authors:  Eric M Kramer; P A Tayjasanant; Bethan Cordone
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-06-11

10.  Distinct roles of the polarity factors Boi1 and Boi2 in the control of exocytosis and abscission in budding yeast.

Authors:  Aina Masgrau; Andrea Battola; Trinidad Sanmartin; Leszek P Pryszcz; Toni Gabaldón; Manuel Mendoza
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 4.138

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.