CONTEXT: Preclinical research has demonstrated a window of vulnerability in the immediate aftermath of concussion wherein continued activity and stimulation can impair or prolong neurobehavioral recovery. However, this concept has not been quantified in a human population. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of delayed reporting and removal from athletic activity after concussion on recovery time. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: A National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I university. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-seven athletes who sustained a sport-related concussion between 2008 and 2015 were analyzed (age = 20.4 ± 1.3 years). Athletes were grouped as immediate removal from activity (I-RFA) or delayed removal from activity (D-RFA). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Days missed was defined as the number of days between the concussion-causing event and clearance for return to contact. Associations between RFA group and prolonged (8 or more days') versus normal (7 or fewer days') recovery were also analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty (51.5%) of the 97 athletes did not immediately report concussion symptoms. The D-RFA athletes averaged 4.9 more days missed than the I-RFA athletes. Membership in the specific RFA group predicted days missed even after controlling for sex, concussion history, learning disability or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder diagnosis, diagnosed psychological disorder, and acute symptom severity (R( 2) change = 0.097, β = .319, P = .002). The D-RFA athletes were approximately 2.2 times more likely to have a prolonged recovery (8 or more days) compared with the I-RFA athletes (χ(2) = 10.268, P = .001, ϕ = 0.325). CONCLUSIONS: Athletes who do not immediately report symptoms of a concussion and continue to participate in athletic activity are at risk for longer recoveries than athletes who immediately report symptoms and are immediately removed from activity. Continuing to participate in athletic activity during the immediate aftermath of a concussion potentially exposes the already injured brain to compounded neuropathophysiologic processes.
CONTEXT: Preclinical research has demonstrated a window of vulnerability in the immediate aftermath of concussion wherein continued activity and stimulation can impair or prolong neurobehavioral recovery. However, this concept has not been quantified in a human population. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of delayed reporting and removal from athletic activity after concussion on recovery time. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: A National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I university. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-seven athletes who sustained a sport-related concussion between 2008 and 2015 were analyzed (age = 20.4 ± 1.3 years). Athletes were grouped as immediate removal from activity (I-RFA) or delayed removal from activity (D-RFA). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Days missed was defined as the number of days between the concussion-causing event and clearance for return to contact. Associations between RFA group and prolonged (8 or more days') versus normal (7 or fewer days') recovery were also analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty (51.5%) of the 97 athletes did not immediately report concussion symptoms. The D-RFA athletes averaged 4.9 more days missed than the I-RFA athletes. Membership in the specific RFA group predicted days missed even after controlling for sex, concussion history, learning disability or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder diagnosis, diagnosed psychological disorder, and acute symptom severity (R( 2) change = 0.097, β = .319, P = .002). The D-RFA athletes were approximately 2.2 times more likely to have a prolonged recovery (8 or more days) compared with the I-RFA athletes (χ(2) = 10.268, P = .001, ϕ = 0.325). CONCLUSIONS: Athletes who do not immediately report symptoms of a concussion and continue to participate in athletic activity are at risk for longer recoveries than athletes who immediately report symptoms and are immediately removed from activity. Continuing to participate in athletic activity during the immediate aftermath of a concussion potentially exposes the already injured brain to compounded neuropathophysiologic processes.
Authors: Susanne Meares; E Arthur Shores; Alan J Taylor; Jennifer Batchelor; Richard A Bryant; Ian J Baguley; Jennifer Chapman; Joseph Gurka; Jeno E Marosszeky Journal: Neuropsychology Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: William P Meehan; Rebekah Mannix; Michael C Monuteaux; Cynthia J Stein; Richard G Bachur Journal: Neurology Date: 2014-11-07 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Roberto Vagnozzi; Barbara Tavazzi; Stefano Signoretti; Angela M Amorini; Antonio Belli; Marco Cimatti; Roberto Delfini; Valentina Di Pietro; Antonino Finocchiaro; Giuseppe Lazzarino Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Haley A Bookbinder; Megan N Houston; Karen Y Peck; Stephanie Habecker; Brian J Colsant; Tim F Kelly; Sean P Roach; Steven R Malvasi; Gerald T McGinty; Darren E Campbell; Steven J Svoboda; Kenneth L Cameron Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Thomas G Bowman; Stephanie Mazerolle Singe; Alicia M Pike Lacy; Johna K Register-Mihalik Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2020-01-27 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Christine M Baugh; William P Meehan; Emily Kroshus; Thomas G McGuire; Laura A Hatfield Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2019-03-28 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Gian-Gabriel P Garcia; Steven P Broglio; Mariel S Lavieri; Michael McCrea; Thomas McAllister Journal: Sports Med Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Christine M Baugh; Zachary Y Kerr; Emily Kroshus; Bailey L Lanser; Tory R Lindley; William P Meehan Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2020-06-23 Impact factor: 2.860