Literature DB >> 27111270

Using Language Sample Analysis in Clinical Practice: Measures of Grammatical Accuracy for Identifying Language Impairment in Preschool and School-Aged Children.

Sarita Eisenberg1, Ling-Yu Guo2.   

Abstract

This article reviews the existing literature on the diagnostic accuracy of two grammatical accuracy measures for differentiating children with and without language impairment (LI) at preschool and early school age based on language samples. The first measure, the finite verb morphology composite (FVMC), is a narrow grammatical measure that computes children's overall accuracy of four verb tense morphemes. The second measure, percent grammatical utterances (PGU), is a broader grammatical measure that computes children's accuracy in producing grammatical utterances. The extant studies show that FVMC demonstrates acceptable (i.e., 80 to 89% accurate) to good (i.e., 90% accurate or higher) diagnostic accuracy for children between 4;0 (years;months) and 6;11 in conversational or narrative samples. In contrast, PGU yields acceptable to good diagnostic accuracy for children between 3;0 and 8;11 regardless of sample types. Given the diagnostic accuracy shown in the literature, we suggest that FVMC and PGU can be used as one piece of evidence for identifying children with LI in assessment when appropriate. However, FVMC or PGU should not be used as therapy goals directly. Instead, when children are low in FVMC or PGU, we suggest that follow-up analyses should be conducted to determine the verb tense morphemes or grammatical structures that children have difficulty with. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27111270     DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1580740

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Speech Lang        ISSN: 0734-0478            Impact factor:   1.761


  3 in total

1.  Tracking Early Sentence-Building Progress in Graphic Symbol Communication.

Authors:  Cathy Binger; Jennifer Kent-Walsh; Nancy Harrington; Quinn C Hollerbach
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Concurrent Validity of the Fluharty Preschool Speech and Language Screening Test-Second Edition at Age 3: Comparison With Four Diagnostic Measures.

Authors:  Sarita Eisenberg; Kristen Victorino; Sarah Murray
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Is Putting SUGAR (Sampling Utterances of Grammatical Analysis Revised) Into Language Sample Analysis a Good Thing? A Response to Pavelko and Owens (2017).

Authors:  Ling-Yu Guo; Sarita Eisenberg; Nan Bernstein Ratner; Brian MacWhinney
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 2.983

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.