| Literature DB >> 27110821 |
Li Zhang1, Feng Tian2, Xuejin Gao3, Xinying Wang4, Chao Wu5, Ning Li6, Jieshou Li7.
Abstract
Appropriate metabolic interventions after hemorrhagic shock/resuscitation injury have not yet been identified. We aimed to examine the effects of fish oil on lipid metabolic intervention after hemorrhagic shock/resuscitation. Firstly, 48 C57BL/6 mice were assigned to six groups (n = 8 per group). The sham group did not undergo surgery, while mice in the remaining groups were sacrificed 1-5 days after hemorrhagic shock/resuscitation. In the second part, mice were treated with saline or fish oil (n = 8 per group) five days after injury. We determined serum triglyceride levels and liver tissues were collected and prepared for qRT-PCR or Western blot analysis. We found that triglyceride levels were increased five days after hemorrhagic shock/resuscitation, but decreased after addition of fish oil. After injury, the protein and gene expression of carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1A, fatty acid transport protein 1, and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α decreased significantly in liver tissue. In contrast, after treatment with fish oil, the expression levels of these targets increased compared with those in the saline group. The present results suggest n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids could improve lipid oxidation-related enzymes in liver subjected to hemorrhagic shock/resuscitation. This function is possibly accomplished through activating the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α pathway.Entities:
Keywords: fatty acid oxidation; fish oil; hemorrhagic shock; peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27110821 PMCID: PMC4848705 DOI: 10.3390/nu8040237
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Primer sequences.
| Primer | Primer Sequences (5′to3′) |
|---|---|
| FATP1 Forward | TCTGTTCTGATTCGTGTTCGG |
| FATP1 Reverse | CAGCATATACCACTACTGGCG |
| CPT-1A Forward | CTATGCGCTACTCGCTGAAGG |
| CPT-1A Reverse | GGCTTTCGACCCGAGAAGA |
| PPAR-α Forward | TACTGCCGTTTTCACAAGTGC |
| PPAR-α Reverse | AGGTCGTGTTCACAGGTAAGA |
| 36B4 (internal control) Forward | TGAGATTCGGGATATGCTGTTGG |
| 36B4 (internal control) Reverse | CGGGTCCTAGACCAGTGTTCT |
The level of TG in different groups in Part 1.
| Group | TG (mmol/L) | |
|---|---|---|
| Sham | 0.32 ± 0.09 | |
| D1 | 0.30 ± 0.07 | 0.699 |
| D2 | 0.39 ± 0.08 | 0.210 |
| D3 | 0.42 ± 0.09 | 0.055 |
| D4 | 0.44 ± 0.11 | 0.024 * |
| D5 | 0.51 ± 0.13 | 00.001 ** |
Notes: p: compared with Sham group, *: p < 0.05 and **: p < 0.01.
The level of TG in different groups in Part 2.
| Group | TG (mmol/L) | |
|---|---|---|
| Sham | 0.34 ± 0.19 | |
| FO | 0.39 ± 0.07 | 0.240 |
| Saline | 0.47 ± 0.11 | 0.048 * |
Notes: p: compared with Sham group; *: p < 0.05.
The level of serum cytokines in different groups in Part 1.
| Group | TNF-α (pg/mL) | IL-1 (pg/mL) | IL-6 (pg/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sham | 22.01 ± 9.14 | 10.10 ± 7.23 | 13.00 ± 10.23 |
| D1 | 23.66 ± 13.44 | 12.14 ± 7.67 | 11.75 ± 8.06 |
| D2 | 26.15 ± 10.67 | 14.33 ± 13.04 | 19.75 ± 12.95 |
| D3 | 22.06 ± 6.63 | 12.37 ± 7.49 | 13.25 ± 7.68 |
| D4 | 22.18 ± 7.48 | 11.43 ± 8.03 | 10.25 ± 7.93 |
| D5 | 24.38 ± 10.19 | 10.95 ± 8.98 | 14.25 ± 9.29 |
The level of serum cytokines in different groups in Part 2.
| Group | TNF-α (pg/mL) | IL-1 (pg/mL) | IL-6 (pg/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sham | 23.97 ± 9.35 | 10.18 ± 7.42 | 13.12 ± 9.73 |
| FO | 23.66 ± 13.44 | 12.14 ± 7.67 | 11.75 ± 8.06 |
| Saline | 26.15 ± 10.67 | 14.33 ± 13.04 | 13.25 ± 12.95 |
Figure 1Western blot analysis and qPCR analysis of CPT-1A expression: (A-1) Western blots of CPT-1A in the Part 1 experiment; (A-2) the relative expression of CPT-1A protein was quantified and normalized to that of GAPDH protein; (B-1) Western blots of CPT-1A in the Part 2 experiment; (B-2) the relative expression of CPT-1A protein was quantified and normalized to that of GAPDH protein; (C) the relative expression of CPT-1A was normalized to that of 36B4 in the Part 1 experiment; and (D) the relative expression of CPT-1A was normalized to that of 36B4 in the Part 2 experiment. * p < 0.05 compared to the sham group; ** p < 0.01 compared to the sham group; # p < 0.05 compared to the FO group. Error bars indicate standard deviations. D1–D5 indicate days after operation in the experimental groups.
Figure 2Western blot analysis and qPCR analysis of FATP-1 expression: (A-1) Western blots of FATP-1 in the Part 1 experiment; (A-2) the relative expression of FATP-1 protein was quantified and normalized to that of GAPDH protein; (B-1) Western blots of FATP-1 in the Part 2 experiment; (B-2) the relative expression of FATP-1 protein was quantified and normalized to that of GAPDH protein; (C) the relative expression of FATP-1 was normalized to that of 36B4 in the Part 1 experiment; and (D) the relative expression of FATP-1 was normalized to that of 36B4 in the Part 2 experiment. * p < 0.05 compared to the sham group; ** p < 0.01 compared to the sham group; # p < 0.05 compared to the FO group. Error bars indicate standard deviations. D1–D5 indicate days after operation in the experimental groups.
Figure 3Western blot analysis and q-PCR analysis of PPAR-α expression: (A-1) Western blots of PPAR-α in the Part 1 experiment; (A-2) the relative expression of PPAR-α protein was quantified and normalized to that of GAPDH protein; (B-1) Western blots of PPAR-α in the Part 2 experiment; (B-2) the relative expression of PPAR-α protein was quantified and normalized to that of GAPDH protein; (C) the relative expression of PPAR-α expression was normalized to that of 36B4 in the Part 1 experiment; and (D) the relative expression of PPAR-α expression was normalized to that of 36B4 in the Part 2 experiment. * p < 0.05 compared to the sham group; ** p < 0.01 compared to the sham group; # p < 0.05 compared to the FO group. Error bars indicate standard deviations. D1–D5 indicate days after operation in the experimental groups.