| Literature DB >> 27110198 |
Andrey V Matalin1, Vladimir I Chikatunov2.
Abstract
Based on field studies, museums collections and literature sources, the current knowledge of the tiger beetle fauna of Israel and adjacent lands is presented. In Israel eight species occur, one of them with two subspecies, while in the Sinai Peninsula nine species of tiger beetles are now known. In the combined regions seven genera from two tribes were found. The Rift Valley with six cicindelids species is the most specious region of Israel. Cylindera contorta valdenbergi and Cicindela javeti azari have localized distributions and should be considered regional endemics. A similarity analysis of the tiger beetles faunas of different regions of Israel and the Sinai Peninsula reveal two clusters of species. The first includes the Great Rift Valley and most parts of the Sinai Peninsula, and the second incorporates most regions of Israel together with Central Sinai Foothills. Five distinct adult phenological groups of tiger beetles can be distinguished in these two clusters: active all-year (three species), spring-fall (five species), summer (two species), spring-summer (one species) and spring (one species). The likely origins of the tiger beetle fauna of this area are presented. An annotated list and illustrated identification key of the Cicindelinae of Israel and adjacent lands are provided.Entities:
Keywords: Carabidae; Cicindelinae; Egypt; Israel; Jordan; Lebanon; Levant; Mediterranean; Sinai; Syria; catalogue; distribution; endemic; fauna; faunogenesis; key; near-endemic; phenology; tiger beetles
Year: 2016 PMID: 27110198 PMCID: PMC4829963 DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.578.7383
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Zookeys ISSN: 1313-2970 Impact factor: 1.546
Figure 1.Distribution of in Israel, Palestine and border areas of Jordan (open circles records before year 1949, half-solid circles records between years 1950–1999, solid circles records after year 2000; map source Eric Gaba Wikimedia Commons user: Sting and Wikimedia Commons user: NordNordWest, URL https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7c/Israel_relief_location_map.jpg)
Figure 2.Distribution of (red circles) and (blue rhombs) in Sinai Peninsula, Egypt (open symbols records before year 1949, half-solid symbols between years 1950–1999, solid symbols records after year 2000; URL map source https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/59/Sinai_relief_location_map.svg).
Figure 3.Distribution of two subspecies of in Israel, Palestine and border areas of Jordan (red circles – , blue circles – , open circles records before year 1949, half-solid circles – records between years 1950–1999, solid circles – records after year 2000; map source Eric Gaba Wikimedia Commons user: Sting and Wikimedia Commons user: NordNordWest, URL https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7c/Israel_relief_location_map.jpg).
Figure 4.Distribution of (orange triangles), (red circles) and (blue rhombs) in Israel, Palestine and border areas of Lebanon (open symbols records before year 1949, half-solid symbols – records between years 1950–1999; map source Eric Gaba Wikimedia Commons user: Sting and Wikimedia Commons user: NordNordWest, URL https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7c/Israel_relief_location_map.jpg).
Figure 5.Distribution of (red circles), (blue rhombs) and (green triangles) in Sinai Peninsula, Egypt (open symbols records before year 1949, half-solid symbols – records between years 1950–1999; URL map source https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/59/Sinai_relief_location_map.svg).
Figures 30–45.Pronotum of males, dorsal view: 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 ; pr st pronotopleural suture. Scale bars: 1 mm (30–33: A; 34–37: B; 38–41: C; 42–43: D; 44: E; 45: F).
Figures 46–61.Left elytron of males, dorsal view: 46 47 48 ; 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 . Scale bars: 1 mm.
Figures 93–100.Aedeagus and internal sack of ssp.: 93–96 97–100 93, 97 aedeagus 94–96, 98–100 internal sac 93, 96–97, 100 left lateral view 95, 99 dorsal view 94, 98 right lateral view 98–100 partly inflanted); B basal bladder; VLR – ventro-lateral right bladder. Scale bars: 1 mm (93, 97: A; 94–96: B; 98–100: C).
Figure 9.Distribution of (red circles), (blue rhombs), (orange squares) and (lilac triangles) in Sinai Peninsula, Egypt (open symbols records before year 1949, half-solid symbols – records between years 1950–1999; URL map source https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/59/Sinai_relief_location_map.svg).
Figure 6.Distribution of in Israel and Palestine (open circles records before year 1949, half-solid circles records between years 1950–1999, solid circles records after year 2000; map source Eric Gaba Wikimedia Commons user: Sting and Wikimedia Commons user: NordNordWest, URL https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7c/Israel_relief_location_map.jpg).
Figure 7.Distribution of in Israel, Palestine and border areas of Jordan (open circles records before year 1949, half-solid circles records between years 1950–1999, solid circles records after year 2000; map source Eric Gaba Wikimedia Commons user: Sting and Wikimedia Commons user: NordNordWest, URL https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7c/Israel_relief_location_map.jpg).
Figure 8.Distribution of in Israel and Palestine (open circles records before year 1949, half-solid circles records between years 1950–1999, solid circles records after year 2000; map source Eric Gaba Wikimedia Commons user: Sting and Wikimedia Commons user: NordNordWest, URL https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7c/Israel_relief_location_map.jpg).
The distribution of tiger beetles in different regions of Israel and the Sinai Peninsula.
| Species/Subspecies | Choro-types | Israel | Siani (Egypt) | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Galilee | Golan Heights (including Mt. Hermon) | Coastal Plain | Judea | Rift Valley | Negev | Northern Siani | Central Siani Foothills | Sinai Mountains | Southwestern Sinai | ||||||||||
| Upper | Lower | Northern | Central | Southern | Judean Desert | Judean Hills | Jordan Valley | Dead Sea Area | Arava Valley | Northern | Central | Southern | |||||||
|
|
| ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ||||||||||||
|
|
| ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ||||||||||||
|
|
| ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | |||||||||||||
|
|
| ● | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
| ● | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
| ● | ● | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
| ● | ● | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
| ● | ● | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
| ● | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
| ● | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
| ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | |||||||
|
|
| ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | |||
|
|
| ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | |||||||||||
| Total for localities | 3 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 7 | |
| 4 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 9 | |||||||||||||
| Total for regions | 8(9) | 9 | |||||||||||||||||
Chorotypes: AFT, AMC, INP, NAA, SAT, SMS, SSS, WMA, CPND, EGYP, LEVC.
– Afrotropical
– Afrotropical-Mediterraneo-Centralasiatic
– Irano-Palestinian
– NE-African-Arabian
– S-Anatolia-Turanian
– S-Mediterraneo-Sindian
– Saharo-Sahelo-Sindian
– W-Mediterraneo-N-African
– Coastal Plain-Nile Delta endemic
– Egyptian endemic
– C-Levntian endemic
Figure 101.Similarities between tiger beetle faunas of different regions of Israel and the Sinai Peninsula (Complete linkage procedure, squared Euclidean distances).
The phenology of tiger beetles in Israel (grey – our data; pink – after Nussbaum 1987) and in the Egypt (green – after Alfieri 1975; blue – after Abdel-Dayem et al. 2003).
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
| |||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||
| I | II | III | IV | V | VI | VII | VIII | IX | X | XI | XII |
Notes. Si – records only on the Sinai Peninsula, (Si) – records including the Sinai Peninsula. The density of the grey color corresponds with the frequency of the records of species (subspecies):
| 1(2) | Anterior angles of pronotum projected towards the margin of prothorax (Figs |
|
| 2(1) | Anterior angles of pronotum not projected towards the margin of prothorax (Figs |
|
| 3(4) | Proepisterna prominent on pronotum so pronotopleural suture clearly visible dorsally (Fig. |
|
| 4(3) | Proepisterna not prominent on pronotum so pronotopleural suture not visible dorsally (Figs |
|
| 5(6) | Labrum with four submarginal setae (Fig. |
|
| 6(5) | Labrum with at least six submarginal setae, except aberrant specimens with 3–5 setae (Figs |
|
| 7(8) | Genae pilose (Figs |
|
| 8(7) | Genae glabrous (Figs |
|
| 9(10) | Clypeus glabrous, anterior and posterior margins of each eye with group of white decumbent setae; labrum with 10 submarginal setae in a single row (Fig. |
|
| 10(9) | Clypeus pilose, anterior and posterior margins of each eye glabrous; labrum with several rows of numerous submarginal setae (Figs |
|
| 11(12) | Elytra dark brown with purple-bronze or green reflection (Fig. |
|
| 12(11) | Elytra green sometimes with bronze or blue reflection (Figs |
|
| 12a(12b) | Left mandible with four teeth distal to apical molar (Fig. |
|
| 12b(12a) | Left mandible with three teeth distal to apical molar (Fig. |
|
| 12c(12d) | Labrum wider, 2.6–2.65 times as wide as long (Fig. |
|
| 12d(12c) | Labrum narrower, 2.35–2.45 times as wide as long (Fig. |
|
| 13(14) | Labrum tridentate with distinctly prominent apical teeth; mandibles with two teeth distal to apical molar (Fig. |
|
| 14(13) | Labrum unidentate (Fig. |
|
| 15(16) | Head glabrous; scapus with apical setae only (Fig. |
|
| 16(15) | Frons and vertex with long soft hairs, scapus with several setae except apical ones (Figs |
|
| 17(18) | Anterior portion of apical lunule long, extending basal transverse portion of middle band (Fig. |
|
| 18(17) | Anterior portion of apical lunule short, extending only apical portion of middle band (Figs |
|
| 19(20) | Labrum tridentate, relatively short, no less than 2.3 times as wide as long (Fig. |
|
| 20(19) | Labrum unidentate, relatively long, no more than 2.3 times as wide as long (Figs |
|
| 21(22) | 4–11th antennomeres dark brown; elytra bright purple, 1.5–1.6 times as long as wide (Fig. |
|
| 22(21) | 4–11th antennomeres light brown or yellowish; elytra greenish or greenish-blue sometimes with distinct golden-purple reflection, no less than 1.65 times as long as wide (Figs |
|
| 23(24) | Labrum shorter, 2.0–2.2 times as wide as long (Fig. |
|
| 24(23) | Labrum longer, 1.6–1.7 times as wide as long (Fig. |
|
| 25(26) | Pronotum with convex lateral sides gradually convergent to posterior angles, anterior margin same length or slightly longer than posterior one, notopleural suture looks like smooth border (Fig. |
|
| 26(25) | Pronotum with straight lateral sides sharply convergent to posterior angles, anterior margin clearly longer than posterior one, notopleural suture looks like cut border (Fig. |
|
| 1–3 | 4–6 | 7–9 | 10–12 | 13–15 | 16–18 |