Patients with depression display cytokine levels in serum and cerebrospinal fluid similar to patients with diffuse neurological symptoms without a defined diagnosis.

INTRODUCTION: Several reports indicate that inflammation may play a role in depression and demonstrate enhanced systemic levels of inflammatory mediators. We hypothesized that 44 patients with a diagnosis of depression would present with a specific and different serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytokine profile compared to 21 patients with diffuse neurological symptoms, of whom 15 had fatigue as a major symptom, but no change in emotional state.
METHODS: The diagnoses of the patients with depression were according to the International Classification of Diseases, tenth edition (F32-34 spectra). Cytokine profiles in serum and CSF were determined by multiplex analysis, including 27 cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors.
RESULTS: No differences could be found between the two groups studied regarding cytokine levels in serum or CSF except for serum interleukin (IL)-1 receptor antagonist that was lower in the depression group. There were only four high correlations (>0.4) between serum and CSF levels of the cytokines, reflecting independent synthesis and turnover in these two compartments. In the control group, fatigue was associated with increased IL-1 receptor antagonist, IL-10, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, and interferon-γ (all P<0.01).
CONCLUSION: Patients with depression had a similar cytokine profile as nondepressive patients, both systemically and in CSF. Fatigue was associated with higher levels of some inflammatory markers in the control group. It is possible that the presence of fatigue in a large proportion of patients and controls could contribute to the lack of difference in cytokine levels between these two groups.

Introduction

Depression is the most widespread mental disorder in the world as >350 million individuals suffer from the disorder worldwide.1 Three general mechanisms have been suggested to influence biomarkers related to depression, namely, through neurotransmitter signaling, the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, and inflammation. Alterations in these interacting pathways also seem to play a pathogenic role in depressive disorders. As for inflammation, several lines of evidence support a role for activation of these pathways in the progression of depression. First, several studies have shown increased systemic levels of inflammatory cytokines and other inflammatory markers in patients with depression,2,3 and a recent gene expression study in a large population of patients with major depression disorder revealed a marked regulation of inflammatory and immune-related pathways.4 Second, in patients receiving treatment with cytokines or other immune modulators, a considerable proportion may develop symptoms of severe depression.5–7 Finally, some anti-inflammatory drugs have been shown to exert antidepressive effects.8,9

Other disorders related to psychological disturbances such as chronic fatigue and fibromyalgia may also show signs of systemic inflammation even though they do not show any changed emotional state as in depression.10,11

Moreover, while several studies have examined plasma or serum levels of inflammatory markers in depressive disorders, data on these markers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are scarce.3 Finally, cytokines and inflammatory mediators operate in network, and while several studies3 have examined some standard inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor and interleukin (IL)-6 in these patients, fewer have simultaneously examined a wide range of inflammatory and anti-inflammatory markers reflecting the cytokine network.

We hypothesized that patients with a diagnosis of depression would present with a specific and different serum and CSF cytokine network profile compared to patients with diffuse neurological symptoms, but with no change in the emotional state.

Materials and methods

Patients and controls

A group of depressed patients (n=49) were recruited from inpatient wards and outpatient clinics of the mental health unit at Innlandet Hospital Trust in the eastern part of Norway. They were all older than 18 years and had a diagnosis of depression according to the research criteria of International Classification of Diseases, tenth edition (F32–34 spectra) and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition, text revision. Five of these patients were excluded because they were not able to give CSF sample for different reasons. The control group comprised 21 patients with neurological symptoms referred to the Department of Neurology at the same hospital for thorough investigations. They all had a careful neurological examination, including computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging scans and spinal fluid examination. None of them had any neurological signs of disease, and neither did any of them have any laboratory findings indicating cerebral disease or disorder. Clinically, they had many of the same components as in depression, including tiredness, fatigue, lack of initiative, and a feeling that the body is not functioning, but without any overt signs of depression, ie, change in mood or emotional state. A medical history was recorded, a routine clinical examination was performed, and hematological and biochemical screening tests were carried out in all patients. None of the participants included in the study had any known comorbid disorders such as infection or inflammatory disorders that could influence the levels of cytokines. The data were collected between October 2010 and December 2013 by the same personnel and handled and stored at the hospital laboratory.

Ethics

The study was approved by the Norwegian Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics. Written informed consent was given by all participants before inclusion.

Psychiatric and neuropsychological examination

All patients were examined with the Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS;12 no depression 0–6, mild depression 7–19, moderate depression 20–34, and severe depression >34), the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II;13–15 minimal depression 0–13, mild depression 14–19, moderate depression 20–28, and severe depression 29–63), and the Mini–Mental Status Examination (MMSE)16 for cognitive functioning/dementia (score 0–30, normal ≥24). The participants were asked about fatigue in the clinical interview, and questions about these symptoms are also one of the items on the BDI-II and MADRS.

Collection of serum and CSF

Peripheral blood was collected and allowed to clot for 30 minutes before centrifugation for 10 minutes at 2,000× g. CSF samples were obtained by a trained neurologist and centrifuged within 30 minutes at 2,000× g for 10 minutes. Serum and CSF were aliquoted and stored at −70°C until analyses were performed. All blood samples were taken between 8.30 am and 10 am. The spinal tap was done before 12 pm, except for two depressed patients who did the procedure closer to 1 pm. None of the patients were fasting as a prerequisite before blood or CSF sampling.

Multiplex analysis

The samples were analyzed according to the instructions from the manufacturer on a Multiplex Analyzer using a multiplex cytokine assay (Bio-Plex Human Cytokine 27-Plex Panel; Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) containing the following ILs, chemokines, and growth factors: IL-1β; IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra); IL-2; IL-4; IL-5; IL-6; IL-7; IL-8 (CXCL8); IL-9; IL-10; IL-12 (p70); IL-13; IL-15; IL-17; eotaxin/CCL11; basic fibroblast growth factor; granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF); granulocyte macrophage CSF; interferon (IFN)-γ; IFN-inducible protein 10 (IP-10; CXCL10); monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1; CCL2); macrophage inflammatory peptide (MIP)-1α (CCL3); MIP-1β (CCL4); platelet-derived growth factor-BB; regulated on activation, normal T-cell expressed and secreted (RANTES; CCL5) tumor necrosis factor; and vascular endothelial growth factor. The inter- and intra-assay coefficients of variants were <12% for all 27 analytes, and based on years of experience with equal results for duplicates, the method is now standardized for single measurement in our laboratory.

Serum samples for 25 of the analytes showed detectable values for 100% of the samples. For granulocyte macrophage CSF and RANTES, 97% and 93% of the samples, respectively, were within detectable limits. CSF samples for 24 of the analytes showed detectable values for >93% of the samples. For IL-12, IL-7, and G-CSF, 3%, 38%, and 89% of the samples, respectively, were within detectable limits.

Statistical analysis

The characteristics of the patients were analyzed with descriptive statistics and reported as exact number (percentages) or mean and standard deviation (SD). Comparisons between the groups were analyzed with an exact test for 2×2 tables and Student’s t-test with Levene’s test for equality of variance and adjusting for antidepressive and antipsychotic medication. Correlations were assessed with Spearman’s rho. Owing to multiple comparisons, P-values (two-sided) were considered to be significant when >0.01.

Results

The characteristics of the participants with comparisons between the two groups of individuals are shown in Table 1. Compared to controls, the patients with depression had significantly higher scores on BDI-II and MADRS and lower score on MMSE. All participants except for one in the depression group (who had 23 score, which is just below the average score) scored in the normal range on MMSE.

Table 1

Demographic characteristics

Demographics, distinctive measurements, and medication	Neurological group	Depression group	P-value
Age	47.9 (13.9)	44.7 (15.1)	0.41
Sex (female/male)	14/7	23/21	0.27
MMSEa	29.2 (1.0)	28.3 (1.8)	0.02
BDI-IIa	6.5 (6.7)	31.1 (12.6)	<0.0001
MADRSa	8.1 (5.9)	28.0 (8.0)	<0.0001
Antidepressive drugs	1 (4.8%)	30 (68.2%)	<0.0001
Antipsychotic drugs	0 (0%)	14 (31.8%)	0.004

Notes: Age, MMSE, BDI-II, and MADRS scores are reported as mean (SD), whereas sex and medication are expressed as the number of concerned individuals (% of the group).

Two participants in the neurological group did not complete these examinations.

Abbreviations: MMSE, Mini–Mental Status Examination; BD-II, Beck Depression Inventory-II; MADRS, Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale; SD, standard deviation.

Cytokine levels in serum and CSF

There were no significant differences between the two study groups with respect to cytokine levels in serum (Table 2). IL-1Ra showed a borderline significant result with a lower level for the depressed participants compared to the controls. Similarly, there were no differences between the two groups with respect to cytokine levels in CSF (Table 3).

Table 2

Comparison of the cytokine serum (pg/mL) levels for the two study groups

Cytokine	Neurological group (mean, SD), N=21	Depression group (mean, SD), N=44	P-value*
IL-1β	1.4 (0.2)	1.3 (0.3)	0.10
IL-1Ra	188 (41)	164 (42)a	0.01
IL-2	4.9 (5.4)	3.5 (2.7)a	0.21
IL-4	2.6 (0.5)	2.5 (0.5)	0.02
IL-5	0.7 (0.1)	0.8 (0.9)	0.76
IL-6	6.4 (1.7)	6.1 (2.3)	0.28
IL-7	4.1 (1.4)	3.6 (1.4)	0.02
IL-8	12 (2.9)	13 (3.0)	0.57
IL-9	20 (5.6)	22 (10)a	0.30
IL-10	4.4 (1.8)	3.5 (1.9)	0.05
IL-12 p70	19 (10)	17 (9.9)	0.35
IL-13	3.4 (1.7)	2.7 (0.7)	0.02
IL-15	1.1 (0.5)	1.1 (0.9)a	0.20
IL-17A	122 (35)	122 (32)	0.52
Eotaxin	92 (49)	103 (76)	0.51
FGF-basic	52 (13)	53 (15)	0.96
G-CSF	67 (17)	64 (20)	0.32
GM-CSF	8.3 (4.6)	7.2 (5.0)	0.16
IFN-γ	61 (13)	55 (11)	0.09
IP-10	506 (244)	585 (316)	0.70
MCP-1	40 (16)	36 (11)	0.06
MIP-1α	2.3 (0.5)	2.2 (0.9)	0.72
MIP-1β	117 (61)	129 (45)	0.96
PDGF-BB	4,090 (1,727)	3,756 (1,067)	0.21
RANTES	53,647 (32,113)	68,501 (122,517)	0.78
TNFα	31 (4.3)	30 (5.5)	0.07
VEGF	45 (35)	41 (24)	0.24

Notes:

For these cytokines, one participant with an extreme value (ie, >3 SD from mean) was excluded.

Adjusted for use of antipsychotic and antidepressive medication.

Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; IL, interleukin; IL-1Ra, IL-1 receptor antagonist; FGF, fibroblast growth factor; G-CSF, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor; GM-CSF, granulocyte macrophage CSF; IFN, interferon; IP-10, IFN-inducible protein 10; MCP-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein 1; MIP-1, macrophage inflammatory peptide 1; PDGF-BB, platelet-derived growth factor-BB; RANTES, regulated on activation, normal T-cell expressed and secreted; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.

Table 3

Comparison of cytokine cerebrospinal fluid levels (pg/mL) for the two study groups

Cytokine	Neurological group (mean, SD), N=21	Depression group (mean, SD), N=44	P-value*
IL-1β	0.4 (1.1)	0.2 (0.3)	0.21
IL-1Ra	0.8 (0.3)	0.8 (0.3)	0.13
IL-2	0.7 (0.4)	0.5 (0.4)	0.30
IL-4	0.1 (0.1)	0.1 (0.1)	0.27
IL-5	0.2 (0.1)	0.3 (0.4)	0.65
IL-6	3.3 (1.3)	4.0 (3.2)	0.75
IL-7a
IL-8	36 (13)	38 (15)	0.49
IL-9	3.3 (1.1)	3.3 (0.9)	0.21
IL-10	1.6 (0.4)	1.5 (0.3)	0.40
IL-12 p70a
IL-13	4.6 (7.3)	5.8 (12)	0.70
IL-15	5.4 (1.5)	5.4 (1.8)	0.57
IL-17A	6.3 (3.9)	6.2 (3.7)	0.56
Eotaxin	3.7 (5.7)	3.1 (8.5)	0.45
FGF-basic	7.0 (3.7)	6.0 (3.4)	0.34
G-CSFa
GM-CSF	45 (7.7)	45 (7.7)	0.69
IFN-γ	3.9 (9.0)	2.9 (8.1)	0.58
IP-10	670 (399)	693 (424)	0.50
MCP-1	287 (130)	286 (116)	0.87
MIP-1α	1.0 (0.3)	1 (0.3)	0.29
MIP-1β	17 (6.6)	14 (4.7)	0.06
PDGF-BB	3.7 (2.7)	4.3 (3.9)	0.24
RANTES	2.7 (2.2)	3.6 (6.5)	0.13
TNFα	1.6 (0.9)	1.4 (0.8)	0.29
VEGF	15 (5.5)	15 (5.4)	0.16

Notes:

The levels of cytokines were below the lower detection limit.

Adjusted for use of antipsychotic and antidepressive medication.

Abbreviations: IL, interleukin; IL-1Ra, IL-1 receptor antagonist; FGF, fibroblast growth factor; G-CSF, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor; GM-CSF, granulocyte macrophage CSF; IFN, interferon; IP-10, IFN-inducible protein 10; MCP-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein 1; MIP-1, macrophage inflammatory peptide 1; PDGF-BB, platelet-derived growth factor-BB; RANTES, regulated on activation, normal T-cell expressed and secreted; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.

Severity of depression and cytokine levels

Among the patients with depression, there were no significant associations between severity of symptoms measured with MADRS and BDI-II and serum cytokine levels. In CSF, severity of symptoms and IL-15 (BDI-II: ρ=−0.37, P=0.01; MADRS: ρ=−0.47, P=0.001) and MCP-1 (BDI-II: ρ=−0.54, P<0.001) were correlated. In CSF of the controls, IL-2 levels were correlated with the severity of symptoms (BDI-II [IL-2]: ρ=−0.63, P=0.004). On BDI-II, there is partly an overlap between depression symptoms and symptoms related to physical and psychological functions such as change in appetite, fatigue and tiredness, and concentration difficulty, which may also give elevated scores on MADRS or BDI-II in the control group even though the patients are not depressed.

Fatigue symptoms and cytokine levels

There was an overlap in symptoms between the two groups studied, especially related to fatigue. In the depressed group, 42 of the 44 patients reported to experience fatigue to be part of the depression disorder. In the control group, 15 of the 21 patients had fatigue.

These 15 with fatigue symptoms had significantly higher serum levels of IL-1Ra (P=0.010), IL-10 (P=0.004), G-CSF (P=0.006), and IFN-γ (P=0.004) than those without fatigue symptoms (n=6). In contrast, CSF values did not discriminate between those with fatigue and those without. As fatigue most probably is a part of the phenotype of depression, being present in 42 of the 44 patients with depression, we were precluded from doing a similar analysis in depressive patients.

Correlations between cytokine levels in serum and CSF

Within the control group, there was high correlation between eotaxin in serum and CSF (ρ=0.63, P=0.002). For the patients with depression, high correlations were seen for eotaxin (ρ=0.44, P=0.003), IP-10 (ρ=0.46, P=0.002), and MIP-1β (ρ=0.46, P=0.002). Otherwise, correlations were lower than 0.4.

Discussion

In contrast to our hypothesis that patients with major depression would present with a specific and different serum and CSF cytokine network profile compared to patients with diffuse neurological symptoms, we observed no differences in the levels of a wide range of cytokines in either serum or CSF between the two study groups, except for marginally lower levels of IL-1Ra in depressive patients. Furthermore, except for a few chemokines, relatively few correlations were found between serum and CSF suggesting limited interplay between these compartments in these individuals, with no differences between depressive patients and controls. However, it must be emphasized that it is difficult to draw firm conclusions from such a small sample size as in this study. Also, a limitation of the study is that some degree of intraindividual variability occurs in the methods used in the study. Therefore, repeated measurements over time are the best way to control such variations. Nevertheless, if it is difficult to obtain approval for one CSF sample, it would be very complicated to get multiple samples from the same individual. However, one cannot exclude that some physiological variability adds a layer of uncertainty to the pathological variation when measuring a single time point.

Based on the growing body of evidence demonstrating elevated systemic levels of proinflammatory cytokines and several chemokines in blood of depressed patients,3 it is surprising that we found no associations between systemic markers and severity of depressive symptoms in the serum of the patient group. However, whereas most previous studies (e.g. Hestad et al 2009)17 have compared inflammatory serum markers in patients with depression and healthy controls, we in the present study examined these markers in both serum and CSF and included a control group with a certain degree of overlap in symptoms, especially related to fatigue, but without a depressive disorder. Several studies have demonstrated that depression and chronic fatigue and fibromyalgia share aberrations in inflammatory pathways,18 and it is not inconceivable that this could have contributed to the lack of differences in cytokine levels between the two groups of individuals in the present study. It is possible that depression cannot be distinguished from patients who suffer from fatigue with respect to systemic or CSF values of inflammatory markers because a large proportion of the depressive patients also have similar symptoms. However, it is suggested that possible inflammatory processes seen in depression might be closely linked with multiple neurodegenerative pathways.19,20 Advanced aging and a number of risk factors such as obesity, hypertension, diabetes, and atherosclerosis could act as “silent contributors” promoting a chronic proinflammatory state. Brain reserves may have neuroprotective effects against late life depression.21 In our project, the study population was relatively young with a mean age of ~45 and no degenerative signs of sickness. It may be that a higher age and more comorbidity would have contributed to a higher level of inflammation among the depressed participants.

A few studies have examined the cytokine level in CSF in patients with depression. Evidence has shown increased levels of IL-1β22 and divergent results for IL-622,23 and MCP-1.24 The last study was related to medication with IFN-α, while Lindqvist et al23 studied suicide attempters and normal controls and Levine et al22 used patients who were evaluated for headache or suspended meningitis as controls. However, no studies have compared levels in CSF with systemic levels of inflammatory markers. Chemokines may enhance permeability of the blood–brain barrier and increase neuroinflammation by promoting infiltration of inflammatory cells.25 In general, we found few correlations >0.4 between the two compartments. However, our finding that eotaxin, IP-10, and MIP-1β showed a high correlation between the two compartments could suggest a potential role for these chemokines in the regulation of neuroinflammation.

Strengths of our study include the case–control design where all the patients came from the same county, were examined at the same hospital, and had an overlap in some but not in all depressive symptoms. The multiplex assay gave us the opportunity to evaluate the inflammatory reaction broadly in both serum and CSF with an acceptable coefficient of variation. However, as there are no universal or official reference range values for the analyses used in the present study, the lack of a normal healthy population group is a limitation of the present study with respect to comparison of the levels of the cytokines in these two groups with a reference population. A limitation of the study is that some degree of intraindividual variability occurs that repeated measurements over time could control for. However, this is not easily done regarding CSF where the method is somewhat more difficult than taking a blood sample. Finally, the subgroup analysis comparing the levels of inflammatory markers in controls with and without fatigue had small groups, and caution is needed when interpreting these results.

Conclusion

In conclusion, compared to patients with diffuse neurological symptoms with fatigue as a major symptom, but with no change in the emotional state, patients with major depression did not display any major alterations in systemic or CSF levels of cytokines and growth factors. The general lack of correlation between serum and CSF suggests limited interactions between the two compartments for the mediators investigated. Fatigue was associated with higher levels of some inflammatory markers, and it is possible that the presence of this symptom in a large proportion of patients and controls could contribute to the lack of difference in cytokine levels between these two groups.