Literature DB >> 2710952

Radiotherapy or surgery for T2N0M0 glottic carcinoma? A decision-analytic approach.

L J Stalpers1, A L Verbeek, W A van Daal.   

Abstract

Decision analysis was used to evaluate the results of treatment of T2N0M0 glottic carcinoma as presented in the literature. Based on mean values for recurrence, salvage eligibility after recurrence and salvage success, the 5-year survival after radiotherapy and surgery proved to be almost identical, 85 and 86%. If the recurrence rates and the salvage rates were varied, a marginal advantage for surgery in small tumours (T2a) and a major advantage in more extended (T2b) tumours was seen if only survival is considered. To take the quality of speech into account, a utility analysis was performed. A utility scale was defined ranging from 0.0 as the value for death, to 1.0 for a successfully irradiated patient with preservation of normal speech. A utility of 0.99 or less for the laryngectomized patient would favour radiotherapy over surgery for all T2 tumours. In patients with T2b tumours and in extreme circumstances, e.g. if failure rates of radiotherapy are extremely high or if recurrence rates after surgery are extremely low, an exact assessment of patient utilities may be pivotal. Under normal circumstances radiotherapy is preferred for T2N0M0 glottic carcinoma if both survival and the quality of speech are taken into account.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2710952     DOI: 10.1016/0167-8140(89)90169-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  4 in total

Review 1.  Radiotherapy versus open surgery versus endolaryngeal surgery (with or without laser) for early laryngeal squamous cell cancer.

Authors:  Laura Warner; Jessal Chudasama; Charles G Kelly; Sean Loughran; Kenneth McKenzie; Richard Wight; Paola Dey
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-12-12

2.  The "gregorio marañon" hospital experience in the treatment of laryngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  M F Vega; T Martinez; B Scola; E Scola; S F Vega
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1997-07

3.  Multiattribute utility assessment of outcomes of treatment for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  S C Hodder; M J Edwards; M R Brickley; J P Shepherd
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 4.  Concordance between decision analysis and matching systematic review of randomized controlled trials in assessment of treatment comparisons: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rahul S Mhaskar; Hesborn Wao; Helen Mahony; Ambuj Kumar; Benjamin Djulbegovic
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 2.796

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.