Literature DB >> 27108894

An integrative review of the factors related to building age-friendly rural communities.

Stephen Neville1, Sara Napier2, Jeffery Adams3, Carol Wham4, Debra Jackson5.   

Abstract

AIM AND
OBJECTIVES: To identify the theories and concepts related to building age-friendly rural communities.
BACKGROUND: Global population is rapidly ageing. Creating environments that support active ageing was a catalyst for the World Health Organization to develop Global Age-Friendly Cities guidelines. Although the age-friendly movement has captured the attention of some countries, little is known about the participation of older people in rural settings.
METHOD: An integrative review approach was employed to summarise the research literature on this topic. Using a systematic search strategy, databases including Discover (EBSCO's electronic database system), Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Medline and Google Scholar were searched. Primary, peer-reviewed studies were included if published during 2007-2014 in the English language.
RESULTS: Nine studies were eligible for inclusion. The studies were set predominantly in Canada, with the exception of one from Ireland. The findings were summarised and clustered into main topics which included: theoretical perspectives; geographic and demographic characteristics; collaboration and partnerships; sustainability and capacity; and finally, future research agendas.
CONCLUSIONS: Rural communities are changing rapidly and are becoming increasingly diverse environments. Community characteristics can help or hinder age-friendliness. Importantly, the fundamental starting point for age-friendly initiatives is establishing older peoples' perceptions of their own communities. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: It is important for nurses, working in primary health care settings, to understand the needs of older people in the communities in which they practice. This includes the community characteristics that can be enablers and barriers to older people being able to remain and age within their own communities.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  active ageing; age-friendly cities; age-friendly communities; ageing-in-place; literature review; rural

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27108894     DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Nurs        ISSN: 0962-1067            Impact factor:   3.036


  5 in total

Review 1.  Integrative review of older adult loneliness and social isolation in Aotearoa/New Zealand.

Authors:  Valerie A Wright-St Clair; Stephen Neville; Vanessa Forsyth; Lindsey White; Sara Napier
Journal:  Australas J Ageing       Date:  2017-03-04       Impact factor: 2.111

Review 2.  Environmental and Psychosocial Interventions in Age-Friendly Communities and Active Ageing: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Diego Sánchez-González; Fermina Rojo-Pérez; Vicente Rodríguez-Rodríguez; Gloria Fernández-Mayoralas
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Knowing, Being and Co-Constructing an Age-Friendly Tāmaki Makaurau Auckland.

Authors:  Judy Blakey; Janet Clews
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  A Policy Framework for Producing Age-Friendly Communities from the Perspective of Production of Space.

Authors:  Jianbo Han; Edwin H W Chan; Esther H K Yung; Queena K Qian; Patrick T I Lam
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  "Engaging in my rural community": perceptions of people aged 85 years and over.

Authors:  Stephen Neville; Jeffery Adams; Sara Napier; Kay Shannon; Debra Jackson
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2018-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.