Literature DB >> 27108488

Timing of pivotal clinical trial results reporting for newly approved medications varied by reporting source.

Bethany Withycombe1, Mac Ovenell1, Amanda Meeker1, Sharia M Ahmed1, Daniel M Hartung2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to characterize the public availability of pivotal clinical trial results for newly approved drugs. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: We examined the availability of pivotal clinical trial results for new molecular entities (NMEs) approved by the US Food and Drug administration (FDA) from 2009 to 2013. For each NME, we quantified the time from approval date until results were available on the FDA web site, in the ClinicalTrials.gov basic results database, and in a medical journal.
RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-five pivotal trials supporting 88 NMEs met our criteria. The median time until pivotal trial results were available on the FDA web site, ClinicalTrials.gov, and in a publication was 42 days, 27 days, and -28 days, respectively. In the first 30 days after approval, 52% of pivotal trials were summarized in ClinicalTrials.gov, 20% were posted to the FDA web site, and 46% were published in a journal. Across all sources, 79% of pivotal trials had results available within 30 days of approval. From 2009 to 2013, the average time until public availability has improved for federal sources.
CONCLUSIONS: Pivotal trials of newly approved drugs appeared first in publications. Results from most pivotal trials were publicly available in some source within 30 days of approval.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Clinical trial registries; Clinical trial reporting; US Food and Drug administration; Unpublished evidence

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27108488     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  2 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of the processes used to link clinical trial registrations to their published results.

Authors:  Rabia Bashir; Florence T Bourgeois; Adam G Dunn
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2017-07-03

2.  Sponsorship, conflict of interest, risk of bias, and reporting of participant's flow and baseline demographic information in studies applicable to the federal law to post the results in clinicaltrials.gov.

Authors:  Tatyana A Shamliyan; Raja Sundarrajan; Dan Camper; Maria Middleton; Ashoka Parameshwara Kadambalithaya
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2016-11-24
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.