| Literature DB >> 27108406 |
Xuelian Chang1,2, Daibin Zhong3, Eugenia Lo2, Qiang Fang4, Mariangela Bonizzoni2, Xiaoming Wang2,5, Ming-Chieh Lee2, Guofa Zhou2, Guoding Zhu1, Qian Qin5, Xiaoguang Chen5, Liwang Cui6, Guiyun Yan7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anopheles sinensis is one of the most abundant vectors of malaria and other diseases in Asia. Vector control through the use of insecticides is the front line control method of vector-borne diseases. Pyrethroids are the most commonly used insecticides due to their low toxicity to vertebrates and low repellency. However, the extensive use of insecticides has imposed strong selection pressure on mosquito populations for resistance. High levels of resistance to pyrethroid insecticides and various mutations and haplotypes in the para sodium channel gene that confers knockdown resistance (kdr) have been detected in An. sinensis. Despite the importance of kdr mutations in pyrethroid resistance, the evolutionary origin of the kdr mutations is unknown. This study aims to examine the evolutionary genetics of kdr mutations in relation to spatial population genetic structure of An. sinensis.Entities:
Keywords: Anopheles sinensis; Evolution; Knockdown resistance; Mitochondrial DNA; Mutation; Para-type sodium channel gene
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27108406 PMCID: PMC4842280 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-016-1513-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Pie charts showing kdr allele frequency distribution of Anopheles sinensis in China. Site names and abbreviations are as in Table 1
Summary of Anopheles sinensis specimen collection sites in China
| Site ID | Name abbreviation | Province: Locality | Latitude (N) | Longitude (E) | Elevation (m) | Collection date | Life-stages analysed | Specimen genotyped |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | YNLH | Yunnan: Lianghe | 24°51’ | 98°18’ | 1199 | 12-Jun | adult | 26 |
| 2 | YNNE | Yunnan: Ninger | 23°03’ | 101°02’ | 1426 | 7-Jul | adult | 24 |
| 3 | SCNJ | Sichuan: Neijiang | 29°40’ | 104°57’ | 321 | 11-Aug | adult & larva | 22 |
| 4 | GXBS | Guangxi: Baise | 23°23’ | 105°49’ | 1072 | 12-Aug | adult | 27 |
| 5 | GZLD | Guizhou: Luodian | 25°25’ | 106°45’ | 830 | 12-Aug | adult | 21 |
| 6 | GZCJ | Guizhou: Congjiang | 25°44’ | 108°54’ | 566 | 12-Aug | adult | 27 |
| 7 | GXLZ | Guangxi: Liuzhou | 25°45’ | 109°36’ | 352 | 12-Aug | adult | 21 |
| 8 | HNBT | Hainan: Baoting | 18°38’ | 109°46’ | 120 | 12-Jun | adult | 12 |
| 9 | GDQY | Guangdong: Qingyuan | 23°40’ | 113°03’ | 87 | 12-Jun | adult | 20 |
| 10 | FJXM | Fujian: Xiamen | 24°25’ | 118°24’ | 66 | 12-Aug | adult & larva | 22 |
| 11 | HBWX | Hubei: Wuxue | 29°50’ | 115°33’ | 14 | 11-Jul | adult | 23 |
| 12 | HNXY | Henan: Xinyang | 32°06’ | 114°01’ | 117 | 11-Jul | adult | 22 |
| 13 | JSSN | Jiangsu: Suining | 33°52’ | 117°59’ | 24 | 11-Jul | adult | 32 |
| 14 | AHWH | Anhui: Wuhe | 33°09’ | 117°51’ | 17 | 12-Jul | adult | 22 |
| 15 | SDHZ | Shandong: Heze | 34°46’ | 116°06’ | 44 | 12-Aug | adult | 23 |
Polymorphism of kdr intron and neutrality test of 15 Anopheles sinensis populations
| Pop | n | S | K | Pi | Tajima’s | h |
| Fu’s | Fu and Li’s | Fu and Li’s | τ | SSD | r |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Southwest | |||||||||||||
| YNLH | 42 | 16 | 4.570 | 0.070 | 0.731 | 14 | 0.913 | −1.598 | 0.337 | 0.553 | 5.486 | 0.032* | 0.114* |
| YNNE | 32 | 18 | 4.776 | 0.073 | 0.233 | 13 | 0.917 | −1.637 | 0.909 | 0.815 | 5.496 | 0.025 | 0.095* |
| SCNJ | 44 | 15 | 3.744 | 0.058 | 0.269 | 16 | 0.922 | −4.107* | 0.678 | 0.640 | 5.066 | 0.011 | 0.029 |
| South | |||||||||||||
| GXBS | 22 | 16 | 4.368 | 0.067 | −0.018 | 17 | 0.974 | −9.984** | −0.135 | −0.116 | 4.879 | 0.004 | 0.018 |
| GZLD | 32 | 7 | 3.601 | 0.055 | 3.118 | 4 | 0.575 | 5.319* | 1.269 | 2.138* | 8.051 | 0.260 | 0.541** |
| GZCJ | 40 | 15 | 4.318 | 0.066 | 0.715 | 18 | 0.924 | −5.611* | 0.698 | 0.830 | 5.539 | 0.004 | 0.015 |
| GXLZ | 32 | 11 | 3.216 | 0.049 | 0.563 | 14 | 0.823 | −4.616* | −0.092 | 0.132 | 5.156 | 0.023 | 0.088 |
| HNBT | 30 | 13 | 3.724 | 0.057 | 0.445 | 13 | 0.871 | −3.066* | 0.174 | 0.303 | 5.830 | 0.030 | 0.058 |
| GDQY | 36 | 15 | 5.335 | 0.082 | 1.543 | 11 | 0.883 | 0.529 | 1.137 | 1.493 | 6.641 | 0.021 | 0.071 |
| FJXM | 26 | 17 | 4.028 | 0.062 | −0.338 | 14 | 0.923 | −4.397* | −0.463 | −0.497 | 2.371 | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Central | |||||||||||||
| HBWX | 42 | 6 | 1.153 | 0.018 | −0.457 | 4 | 0.301 | 1.111 | 0.356 | 0.122 | 3.000 | 0.056* | 0.497 |
| HNXY | 38 | 5 | 0.906 | 0.014 | −0.614 | 4 | 0.368 | 0.377 | 0.204 | −0.052 | 3.000 | 0.038 | 0.310 |
| JSSN | 30 | 6 | 0.759 | 0.012 | −1.424 | 4 | 0.251 | −0.257 | −1.111 | −1.403 | 3.000 | 0.030 | 0.511 |
| AHWH | 62 | 6 | 0.754 | 0.012 | −1.001 | 5 | 0.292 | −0.700 | 1.158 | 0.544 | 3.000 | 0.030 | 0.425 |
| SDHZ | 38 | 29 | 9.757 | 0.150 | 1.431 | 9 | 0.728 | 5.974* | 0.770 | 1.177 | 18.506 | 0.080* | 0.118* |
n number of sequences used, S number of polymorphic (segregating) sites, K average number of pairwise nucleotide differences, Pi nucleotide diversity, h number of Haplotypes, Hd haplotype diversity, τ estimated parameter of population expansion assuming the stepwise growth model (τ = 2 t*MU where t = time in years, MU = mutation rate per locus), SSD the sum of squared deviations; and r Harpending’s raggedness index
*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01 (FDR < 0.02)
Fig. 2kdr haplotype networks showing the genealogical relationship for Anopheles sinensis. Each haplotype is represented by a circle with size proportional to its frequency in the sample (sample size in parentheses, 2 N = 546). Mutational steps are represented by lines with the indication of the mutation from the immediate ancestral haplotype (kdr mutations in bold). Grey circles: wild-type L1014 allele. Red circles: mutant L1014F allele (G-5-T or G-5-C). Yellow circles: mutant L1014C allele (T-4-G). Green circles: mutant L1014S allele (T-4-C). The numbers from 1 to 8 on the connection lines represent the nucleotide positions at 181, 940, 943, 1161, 1162,1197, 1210 and 1226 when compared with a template sequence (GenBank KP763726)
Fig. 3Cluster analysis based on the combined COI and COII sequences in Anopheles sinensis populations. a Colour codes of populations correspond to the five groups defined by SAMOVA; b UPGMA dendogram based on Nei‘s unbiased genetic distance between the 15 populations of An. sinensis
Fig. 4Genetic landscape shape plot showing patterns of spatial genetic distance for 15 populations of Anopheles sinensis. Geographical coordinates are shown in the X (North–south) and Y (East–west) axes. Z axis (height) corresponds to the genetic distance between individuals. Green peaks (P1, P2 and P3) are indicative of areas with high pairwise genetic distances and red valleys are indicative of areas of low pairwise genetic distance
Analysis of historical demography. Variation of estimated demographic parameters based on mitochondrial COI and COII sequence data of 15 populations of An. sinensis
| Population | N | Tajima’s | Fu’s | SSD |
| R2 | τ | Time (ky) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Southwest | ||||||||
| YNLH | 22 | −0.51 | −3.69 | 0.018 | 0.022 | 0.1014 | 5.027 | 144 |
| YNNE | 21 | 0.17 | −1.28 | 0.016 | 0.031 | 0.1325 | 5.178 | 148 |
| SCNJ | 20 | −1.39 | −9.27** | 0.004 | 0.008 | 0.0717** | 5.392 | 154 |
| South | ||||||||
| GXBS | 21 | −1.56* | −9.83** | 0.007 | 0.015 | 0.0719* | 7.85 | 225 |
| GZLD | 20 | −1.1 | −8.24** | 0.005 | 0.009 | 0.0827* | 5.622 | 161 |
| GZCJ | 18 | −1.45 | −9.65** | 0.077 | 0.01 | 0.0683** | 5.877 | 168 |
| GXLZ | 18 | −1.28 | −11.78** | 0.011 | 0.015 | 0.0764* | 6.232 | 178 |
| HNBT | 12 | −1.07 | −4.53* | 0.005 | 0.012 | 0.0872** | 8.249 | 236 |
| GDQY | 19 | −1.17 | −7.90** | 0.007 | 0.01 | 0.0838* | 7.452 | 213 |
| FJXM | 21 | −1.4 | −7.03** | 0.012 | 0.023 | 0.0663** | 6.844 | 196 |
| Central | ||||||||
| HBWX | 20 | −1.67* | −11.93** | 0.007 | 0.019 | 0.0564** | 6.03 | 173 |
| HNXY | 21 | −1.67* | −13.59** | 0.004 | 0.007 | 0.0652** | 5.726 | 164 |
| JSSN | 24 | −1.46 | −18.64** | 0.004 | 0.008 | 0.0613** | 6.477 | 185 |
| AHWH | 17 | −1.62* | −9.60** | 0.037 | 0.015 | 0.0672** | 6.113 | 175 |
| SDHZ | 18 | −1.83* | −11.96** | 0.003 | 0.005 | 0.0621** | 4.841 | 139 |
N number of samples analysed, SSD the sum of squared deviations, R2 Ramos-Onsins & Rozas’s R2, r Harpending’s raggedness index, τ estimated parameter of population expansion assuming the stepwise growth model (τ = 2 t*MU where t = time in years, MU = mutation rate per locus)
*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01 (FDR < 0.02)
Fig. 5Bayesian estimates of historical asymmetrical migration between populations of Anopheles sinensis. The five locality groups are indicated by dotted circles and arrows indicate the direction of migration rates