Literature DB >> 27108302

The value of qualitative and quantitative assessment of lesion to cerebral cortex signal ratio on double inversion recovery sequence in the differentiation of demyelinating plaques from non-specific T2 hyperintensities.

Salih Hamcan1, Bilal Battal2, Veysel Akgun1, Oguzhan Oz3, Yalcin Bozkurt4, Serdar Tasdemir3, Sebahattin Sari1, Mustafa Tasar1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the usefulness of the visual assessment and to determine diagnostic value of the lesion-to-cerebral cortex signal ratio (LCSR) measurement in the differentiation of demyelinating plaques and non-specific T2 hyperintensities on double inversion recovery (DIR) sequence.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: DIR and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences of 25 clinically diagnosed multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and 25 non-MS patients with non-specific T2-hyperintense lesions were evaluated visually and LCSRs were measured by two observers independently.
RESULTS: On DIR sequence, the calculated mean LCSR ± SD for demyelinating plaques and non-specific T2-hyperintense lesions were 1.60 ± 0.26 and 0.75 ± 0.19 for observer1, and 1.61 ± 0.27 and 0.74 ± 0.19 for observer2. LCSRs of demyelinating plaques were significantly higher than other non-specific T2-hyperintense lesions on DIR sequence. By using the visual assessment demyelinating plaques were differentiated from non-specific T2-hyperintensities with 92.8 % sensitivity, 97.5 % specificity and 95.1 % accuracy for observer1 and 92.8 % sensitivity, 95 % specificity and 93.9 % accuracy for observer2.
CONCLUSION: Visual assessment and LCSR measurement on DIR sequence seems to be useful for differentiating demyelinating MS plaques from supratentorial non-specific T2 hyperintensities. This feature can be used for diagnosis of MS particularly in patients with only supratentorial T2-hyperintense lesions who are categorized as radiologically possible MS. KEY POINTS: • Demyelinating plaques and non-specific T2-hyperintensities have different SI on DIR images. • These differences can be assessed by LCSR measurement or visual assessment. • There is an excellent inter-observer agreement for both methods. • This feature can be used in radiologically possible MS cases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DIR; Demyelinating plaque; MRI; Multiple sclerosis; Signal intensity

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27108302     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-016-4379-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  14 in total

Review 1.  Multiple sclerosis--the plaque and its pathogenesis.

Authors:  Elliot M Frohman; Michael K Racke; Cedric S Raine
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Implementation and evaluation of a new pulse sequence for rapid acquisition of double inversion recovery images for simultaneous suppression of white matter and CSF.

Authors:  B J Bedell; P A Narayana
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Double inversion recovery imaging of the brain: initial experience and comparison with fluid attenuated inversion recovery imaging.

Authors:  K Turetschek; P Wunderbaldinger; A A Bankier; T Zontsich; O Graf; R Mallek; K Hittmair
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  MS, MRI, and the 2010 McDonald criteria: a Canadian expert commentary.

Authors:  Daniel Selchen; Virender Bhan; Gregg Blevins; Virginia Devonshire; Pierre Duquette; Francois Grand'Maison; Marcelo Kremenchutzky; Yves Lapierre; David Li; Sarah Jane von Riedemann; Mark Freedman
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Double inversion recovery brain imaging at 3T: diagnostic value in the detection of multiple sclerosis lesions.

Authors:  M P Wattjes; G G Lutterbey; J Gieseke; F Träber; L Klotz; S Schmidt; H H Schild
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 6.  Current concepts of analysis of cerebral white matter hyperintensities on magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Yoshita; Evan Fletcher; Charles DeCarli
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-12

Review 7.  The clinical importance of white matter hyperintensities on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stéphanie Debette; H S Markus
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-07-26

8.  Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria.

Authors:  Chris H Polman; Stephen C Reingold; Brenda Banwell; Michel Clanet; Jeffrey A Cohen; Massimo Filippi; Kazuo Fujihara; Eva Havrdova; Michael Hutchinson; Ludwig Kappos; Fred D Lublin; Xavier Montalban; Paul O'Connor; Magnhild Sandberg-Wollheim; Alan J Thompson; Emmanuelle Waubant; Brian Weinshenker; Jerry S Wolinsky
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 10.422

9.  A prospective study of patients with brain MRI showing incidental t2 hyperintensities addressed as multiple sclerosis: a lot of work to do before treating.

Authors:  Christine Lebrun; Mikael Cohen; Annabelle Chaussenot; Lydiane Mondot; Stephane Chanalet
Journal:  Neurol Ther       Date:  2014-12-13

Review 10.  Mechanisms of sporadic cerebral small vessel disease: insights from neuroimaging.

Authors:  Joanna M Wardlaw; Colin Smith; Martin Dichgans
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 44.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.