Literature DB >> 27107313

A novel approach to treat in-stent restenosis: 6- and 12-month results using the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold.

Peiman Jamshidi1, Tobias Nyffenegger, Zaid Sabti, Elefteri Buset, Stefan Toggweiler, Richard Kobza, Florim Cuculi.   

Abstract

AIMS: The treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains challenging. Small case series have described successful utilisation of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) (Absorb; Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA) to treat ISR. We report our experience with this novel approach. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Patients with ISR in native coronary arteries undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ISR were treated using BVS. A total of 84 ISR lesions were treated in 65 patients. The mean age was 66±11 years, 28% had acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and 28% were diabetic. PCI was successful in all patients and all scaffolds were delivered and deployed successfully in the target lesion. All 65 patients had six-month follow-up and 49 patients had 12-month clinical follow-up. The target lesion revascularisation (TLR) rate was 3.1% at six months and 12.2% at 12 months. The mean duration from PCI to TLR was 301±148 days. No scaffold thrombosis occurred during the study period.
CONCLUSIONS: This proof of concept study demonstrates that ISR treatment utilising BVS is feasible and appears to have acceptable target lesion failure rates. Prospective randomised trials are necessary to assess whether BVS are more effective than drug-eluting stents or drug-eluting balloons to treat ISR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27107313     DOI: 10.4244/EIJV11I13A287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EuroIntervention        ISSN: 1774-024X            Impact factor:   6.534


  12 in total

1.  Challenging treatment of in-stent restenosis in a coronary bifurcation by implantation of a bioresorbable scaffold under optical coherence tomography guidance.

Authors:  Grzegorz Zuk; Dariusz Ciecwierz; Piotr Drewla; Marcin Gruchała; Juan Luis Gutiérrez-Chico; Milosz Jaguszewski
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 2.737

2.  Bioresorbable scaffolds: should we stay simple or go complex?

Authors:  Luis Ortega-Paz; Salvatore Brugaletta; Hector M Garcia-Garcia; Manel Sabaté
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-06

Review 3.  Therapeutic Options for In-Stent Restenosis.

Authors:  Charles Nicolais; Vladimir Lakhter; Hafeez Ul Hassan Virk; Partha Sardar; Chirag Bavishi; Brian O'Murchu; Saurav Chatterjee
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds-what does the future bring?

Authors:  Jacek Bil; Robert J Gil
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  Current Management of In-Stent Restenosis.

Authors:  Ae Young Her; Eun Seok Shin
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.243

6.  Bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus metallic stent in percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the AIDA trial.

Authors:  Syed Raza Shah; Mazia Fatima; Amin Muhammad Dharani; Waqas Shahnawaz; Syed Arbab Shah
Journal:  J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect       Date:  2017-10-18

Review 7.  Treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Leos Pleva; Pavel Kukla; Ota Hlinomaz
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 8.  Contemporary Management of Stent Failure: Part One.

Authors:  Nikhil Pal; Jehangir Din; Peter O'Kane
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2019-02

9.  Long-term outcomes after treatment of in-stent restenosis using the Absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold.

Authors:  Mehdi Madanchi; Giacomo Maria Cioffi; Adrian Attinger-Toller; Mathias Wolfrum; Federico Moccetti; Thomas Seiler; Luca Vercelli; Philipp Burkart; Stefan Toggweiler; Richard Kobza; Matthias Bossard; Florim Cuculi
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2021-09

10.  Comparison of new-generation drug-eluting stents versus drug-coated balloon for in-stent restenosis: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Jin-Zan Cai; Yong-Xiang Zhu; Xin-Yu Wang; Christos V Bourantas; Javaid Iqbal; Hao Zhu; Paul Cummins; Sheng-Jie Dong; Anthony Mathur; Yao-Jun Zhang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.