M Kääriäinen1, K Salonen1, M Helminen2, U Karhunen-Enckell1. 1. 1 Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland. 2. 2 School of Health Sciences, University of Tampere and Science Centre, Pirkanmaa Hospital District, Tampere, Finland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Chest-wall contouring surgery is an important part of the gender reassignment process that contributes to strengthening the self-image and facilitating living in the new gender role. Here, we analyze the surgical techniques used in our clinic and report the results. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Female-to-male transgender patients (n = 57) undergoing chest-wall contouring surgery at Tampere University Hospital between January 2003 and April 2015 were enrolled in the study. Breast appearance was evaluated and either a concentric circular approach or a transverse incision technique was used for mastectomy. Patient characteristics and data regarding the technique and postoperative results were collected and analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: In addition to the transgender diagnosis, 40.4% of the patients had another psychiatric diagnosis. For mastectomy, a concentric circular approach was used in 50.9% and a transverse incision approach in 49.1% of the patients. In the transverse incision group, 21.4% of the patients underwent pedicled mammaplasty and 78.6% mastectomy with a free nipple-areola complex graft. Compared with the transverse incision group, breasts were smaller (p < 0.001) and body mass index value was lower in the concentric circular group (p = 0.001). One-third of the patients had complications (hematoma, infection, seroma, fistula, or partial necrosis of nipple-areola complex) and the reoperation rate was 8.8%. Hematoma was the most frequent reason for reoperation. Corrections were required for the scar in 14.0% of the patients, the contour in 28.0%, the areola in 15.8%, and the nipple in 5.3%. Secondary corrections were needed more often in the concentric circular (55.2%) than in the transverse incision group (25.0%; p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: The larger the breast, poorer the skin quality, and greater the amount of excess skin, the longer the required incision and resulting scar is for mastectomy of female-to-male patients. Hematoma is the most common reason for acute reoperation and secondary corrections are often needed.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Chest-wall contouring surgery is an important part of the gender reassignment process that contributes to strengthening the self-image and facilitating living in the new gender role. Here, we analyze the surgical techniques used in our clinic and report the results. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Female-to-male transgender patients (n = 57) undergoing chest-wall contouring surgery at Tampere University Hospital between January 2003 and April 2015 were enrolled in the study. Breast appearance was evaluated and either a concentric circular approach or a transverse incision technique was used for mastectomy. Patient characteristics and data regarding the technique and postoperative results were collected and analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: In addition to the transgender diagnosis, 40.4% of the patients had another psychiatric diagnosis. For mastectomy, a concentric circular approach was used in 50.9% and a transverse incision approach in 49.1% of the patients. In the transverse incision group, 21.4% of the patients underwent pedicled mammaplasty and 78.6% mastectomy with a free nipple-areola complex graft. Compared with the transverse incision group, breasts were smaller (p < 0.001) and body mass index value was lower in the concentric circular group (p = 0.001). One-third of the patients had complications (hematoma, infection, seroma, fistula, or partial necrosis of nipple-areola complex) and the reoperation rate was 8.8%. Hematoma was the most frequent reason for reoperation. Corrections were required for the scar in 14.0% of the patients, the contour in 28.0%, the areola in 15.8%, and the nipple in 5.3%. Secondary corrections were needed more often in the concentric circular (55.2%) than in the transverse incision group (25.0%; p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: The larger the breast, poorer the skin quality, and greater the amount of excess skin, the longer the required incision and resulting scar is for mastectomy of female-to-male patients. Hematoma is the most common reason for acute reoperation and secondary corrections are often needed.
Entities:
Keywords:
Transgender patient; breast augmentation; chest-wall contour; female-to-male; male-to-female; mastectomy
Authors: Samyd S Bustos; Doga Kuruoglu; Maria Yan; Valeria P Bustos; Antonio J Forte; Pedro Ciudad; Esther A Kim; Gabriel A Del Corral; Oscar J Manrique Journal: Ann Transl Med Date: 2021-04
Authors: Annie Tang; J Carlo Hojilla; Jordan E Jackson; Kara A Rothenberg; Rebecca C Gologorsky; Douglas A Stram; Colin M Mooney; Stephanie L Hernandez; Karen M Yokoo Journal: Ann Plast Surg Date: 2022-05 Impact factor: 1.763
Authors: William J Rifkin; Isabel S Robinson; Carmen Kloer; Courtney N Cripps; Carter J Boyd; Gaines Blasdel; Lee C Zhao; Rachel Bluebond-Langner Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2022-05-25
Authors: Kara A Rothenberg; Rebecca C Gologorsky; J Carlo Hojilla; Annie Tang; Caitlin M Cohan; Genna Beattie; Karen M Yokoo Journal: Ann Plast Surg Date: 2021-07-01 Impact factor: 1.763
Authors: Tim C van de Grift; Lian Elfering; Mark-Bram Bouman; Marlon E Buncamper; Margriet G Mullender Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Alexander Kamali; Hannes Sigurjónsson; Isak Gran; Filip Farnebo; Kalle Conneryd Lundgren; Fredrik Granath; Pehr Sommar Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2021-07-13