Literature DB >> 27107048

On-pump beating-heart technique is associated with lower morbidity and mortality following coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis.

Chikara Ueki1, Genichi Sakaguchi2, Takehide Akimoto2, Yuko Ohashi2, Hirofumi Sato2.   

Abstract

A hybrid procedure of beating-heart coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with the concomitant use of cardiopulmonary bypass termed on-pump beating-heart CABG (ON-BH CABG) has emerged as an alternative for high-risk patient populations. Although several studies have reported the advantage of ON-BH CABG in high-risk patients, the clinical benefit of ON-BH CABG is still under discussion. Here, we performed a meta-analysis of the data derived from published studies comparing the clinical outcomes of ON-BH CABG with that of conventional arrested heart CABG. Medline, Embase and Scopus databases were searched for relevant publications up to March 2015. A systematic review of the published literature identified 14 published studies incorporating 2040 patients (884 ON-BH CABG and 1156 conventional CABG). Odds ratios (ORs) for binary variables or weighted mean difference for continuous variables were combined using the inverse variance method in a fixed-effects model. Study heterogeneity was tested using Cochran's Q test and the publication bias was assessed using Begg's and Egger's tests. The fixed-effects meta-analysis for early mortality showed that ON-BH CABG provided a 45% lower risk of early mortality compared with conventional CABG (OR 0.553; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.376-0.815; P = 0.003). There was minimal heterogeneity in the included studies (P = 0.29) and no evidence of significant publication bias. A sensitivity analysis, including a random-effects meta-analysis (OR 0.552; 95% CI 0.356-0.856; P = 0.008) and a one-study-removed meta-analysis, supported the validity of the primary analysis for early mortality. There was significantly lower perioperative morbidity associated with ON-BH CABG, including myocardial infarction (OR 0.294; 95% CI 0.141-0.613; P = 0.001), renal failure (OR 0.362; 95% CI 0.209-0.626; P < 0. 001) and low output syndrome (OR 0.330; 95% CI 0.197-0.551; P < 0.001) with no significant heterogeneity. In conclusion, current evidence from comparative studies indicates that ON-BH CABG is associated with significantly lower early morbidity and mortality. The ON-BH CABG could be an attractive planned alternative for high-risk patient populations.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Beating heart; Coronary artery bypass graft; Meta-analysis; On pump

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27107048     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  10 in total

1.  Which Procedure, or Which Patient?

Authors:  Cheng-Hsin Lin; Ron-Bin Hsu
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.672

2.  Lipid emulsion enhances cardiac performance after ischemia-reperfusion in isolated hearts from summer-active arctic ground squirrels.

Authors:  Michele M Salzman; Qunli Cheng; Richard J Deklotz; Gurpreet K Dulai; Hunter F Douglas; Anna E Dikalova; Dorothee Weihrauch; Brian M Barnes; Matthias L Riess
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 2.200

3.  Intermittent on-pump beating-heart coronary artery bypass grafting-a safer option.

Authors:  Sushil Kumar Singh; Sarvesh Kumar; Ved Prakash; Vijayant Devenraj; Vivek Tewarson
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-04-27

4.  Beating-heart on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting vs. off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yefan Jiang; Li Xu; Yuqi Liu; Bowen Deng; Nianguo Dong; Si Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  On-pump beating heart versus conventional on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting on clinical outcomes: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chen Wang; Yefan Jiang; Xionggang Jiang; Si Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Impact of avoiding cardioplegic arrest on clinical outcome in patients undergoing CABG in Bangladesh: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Faizus Sazzad; Geetha Ganesh; Prashasth Cheekoty; Muthu Veerappan; Theo Kofidis
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2021-01-07

7.  Effect of different surgical type of coronary artery bypass grafting on kidney injury: A propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Ming-Jen Chan; Cheng-Chia Lee; Shao-Wei Chen; Feng-Chun Tsai; Pyng-Jing Lin; Pei-Chun Fan; Hsiang-Hao Hsu; Ming-Yang Chang; Yung-Chang Chen; Chih-Hsiang Chang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Simultaneous endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm and coronary artery bypass grafting in an octogenarian: A case report.

Authors:  Tran Quyet Tien; Ho Tat Bang; Lam Thao Cuong; Nguyen Thai An
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2019-11-27

9.  On-pump beating heart versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: comparative study on early and long-term clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Ho Jin Kim; You Na Oh; Min Ho Ju; Joon Bum Kim; Sung-Ho Jung; Cheol Hyun Chung; Jae Won Lee; Suk Jung Choo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Surgical Risk Factors for Ischemic Stroke Following Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. A Multi-Factor Multimodel Analysis.

Authors:  Sandro Gelsomino; Cecilia Tetta; Francesco Matteucci; Stefano Del Pace; Orlando Parise; Edvin Prifti; Aleksander Dokollari; Gianmarco Parise; Linda Renata Micali; Mark La Meir; Massimo Bonacchi
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-07-05
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.