Literature DB >> 27106947

The association of birth model with resilience variables and birth experience: Home versus hospital birth.

Jonathan E Handelzalts1, Arni Zacks2, Sigal Levy2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: to study home, natural hospital, and medical hospital births, and the association of these birth models to resilience and birth experience.
DESIGN: cross-section retrospective design.
SETTING: participants were recruited via an online survey system. Invitations to participate were posted in five different Internet forums for women on maternity leave, from September 2014 to August 2015. PARTICIPANTS: the sample comprised 381 post partum healthy women above the age of 20, during their maternity leave. Of the participants: 22% gave birth at home, 32% gave birth naturally in a hospital, and 46% of the participants had a medical birth at the hospital. MEASUREMENTS: life Orientation Test Revised (LOT-R), General Self-Efficacy Scale, Sense of Mastery Scale, Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ).
FINDINGS: women having had natural births, whether at home or at the hospital, significantly differed from women having had medical births in all aspects of the birth experience, even when controlling for age and optimism. Birth types contributed to between 14% and 24% of the explained variance of the various birth experience aspects. KEY
CONCLUSIONS: home and natural hospital births were associated with a better childbirth experience. Optimism was identified as a resilience factor, associated both with preference as well as with childbirth experience. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: physically healthy and resilient women could be encouraged to explore the prospect of home or natural hospital births as a means to have a more positive birth experience.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Childbirth experience; Home birth; Optimism; Resilience

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27106947     DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  5 in total

Review 1.  Perinatal Resilience for the First 1,000 Days of Life. Concept Analysis and Delphi Survey.

Authors:  Sarah Van Haeken; Marijke A K A Braeken; Tinne Nuyts; Erik Franck; Olaf Timmermans; Annick Bogaerts
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-11-03

2.  The experience of giving birth: a prospective cohort in a French perinatal network.

Authors:  Chloé Arthuis; Juliette LeGoff; Marion Olivier; Anne-Sophie Coutin; Nathalie Banaskiewicz; Philippe Gillard; Guillaume Legendre; Norbert Winer
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 3.105

3.  Women's Choice to Deliver at Home: Understanding the Psychosocial and Cultural Factors Influencing Birthing Choices for Unskilled Home Delivery among Women in Southwestern Uganda.

Authors:  Esther C Atukunda; Godfrey R Mugyenyi; Celestino Obua; Angella Musiimenta; Edgar Agaba; Josephine N Najjuma; Norma C Ware; Lynn T Matthews
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2020-06-03

4.  Measuring women's experiences of decision-making and aspects of midwifery support: a confirmatory factor analysis of the revised Childbirth Experience Questionnaire.

Authors:  Anna Dencker; Liselotte Bergqvist; Marie Berg; Josephine T V Greenbrook; Christina Nilsson; Ingela Lundgren
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  The impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on birth satisfaction in a prospective cohort of 2,341 U.S. women.

Authors:  Heidi Preis; Brittain Mahaffey; Cassandra Heiselman; Marci Lobel
Journal:  Women Birth       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 3.349

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.