Nanne P Kort1, Yoeri F L Bemelmans2, P Hugo M van der Kuy3, Jacqueline Jansen4, Martijn G M Schotanus2. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Dr. H v.d. Hoffplein 1, 6162 BG, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands. n.kort@nannekort.eu. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Dr. H v.d. Hoffplein 1, 6162 BG, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Anaesthesiology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands.
Abstract
PURPOSE: General consensus of patient selection criteria for outpatient joint arthroplasty is lacking, which is paramount to prevent prolonged hospital stay, adverse events and/or readmissions. This review highlights patient selection criteria for OJA based on the current literature and expert opinion. METHODS: A search of the English and International electronic healthcare databases including MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, AMED and the Cochrane library was performed in November 2015 to include studies published during the last 10 years. Furthermore, a survey of physicians from different specialties was performed. RESULTS: Fourteen studies described results regarding outpatient joint arthroplasty. Studies on outpatient hip and/or knee arthroplasty resulted in similar outcome in preselected patients. Patients who are able and willing to participate, with a low ASA classification (<III), undergoing primary arthroplasty, age <75 and with support at home during the first postoperative days are eligible candidates for outpatient joint arthroplasty. Patients with a high ASA classification (>II), bleeding disorders, poorly controlled and/or severe cardiac (e.g. heart failure, arrhythmia) or pulmonary (e.g. embolism, respiratory failure) comorbidities, uncontrolled DM (type I or II), a high BMI (>30 m2/kg), chronic opioid consumption, functional neurological impairments, dependent functional status, chronic/end-stage renal disease and/or reduced preoperative cognitive capacity should be excluded from outpatient joint arthroplasty. The expert opinion-based selection criteria were comparable to literature with a further extension of exclusion for patients with practical issue's, urologic medical history and/or severe mobility disorders. CONCLUSION: Based on the current literature, the presented patient selection criteria provide a basis for outpatient joint arthroplasty and can be useful when selecting patients. Together with a change in mindset, a multidisciplinary approach and literature-based protocols, outpatient joint arthroplasty can be applied in daily orthopaedic practice while ensuring patients' safety. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Clinical review, Level III.
PURPOSE: General consensus of patient selection criteria for outpatientjoint arthroplasty is lacking, which is paramount to prevent prolonged hospital stay, adverse events and/or readmissions. This review highlights patient selection criteria for OJA based on the current literature and expert opinion. METHODS: A search of the English and International electronic healthcare databases including MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, AMED and the Cochrane library was performed in November 2015 to include studies published during the last 10 years. Furthermore, a survey of physicians from different specialties was performed. RESULTS: Fourteen studies described results regarding outpatientjoint arthroplasty. Studies on outpatient hip and/or knee arthroplasty resulted in similar outcome in preselected patients. Patients who are able and willing to participate, with a low ASA classification (<III), undergoing primary arthroplasty, age <75 and with support at home during the first postoperative days are eligible candidates for outpatientjoint arthroplasty. Patients with a high ASA classification (>II), bleeding disorders, poorly controlled and/or severe cardiac (e.g. heart failure, arrhythmia) or pulmonary (e.g. embolism, respiratory failure) comorbidities, uncontrolled DM (type I or II), a high BMI (>30 m2/kg), chronic opioid consumption, functional neurological impairments, dependent functional status, chronic/end-stage renal disease and/or reduced preoperative cognitive capacity should be excluded from outpatientjoint arthroplasty. The expert opinion-based selection criteria were comparable to literature with a further extension of exclusion for patients with practical issue's, urologic medical history and/or severe mobility disorders. CONCLUSION: Based on the current literature, the presented patient selection criteria provide a basis for outpatientjoint arthroplasty and can be useful when selecting patients. Together with a change in mindset, a multidisciplinary approach and literature-based protocols, outpatientjoint arthroplasty can be applied in daily orthopaedic practice while ensuring patients' safety. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Clinical review, Level III.
Entities:
Keywords:
Hip arthroplasty; Knee arthroplasty; Outpatient surgery; Patient selection criteria
Authors: Anne Ruth Bass; Tomás Rodriguez; Gina Hyun; Francisco Gerardo Santiago; Jacqueline Ilji Kim; Scott Christopher Woller; Brian Foster Gage Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2015-07-09 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Richard A Berger; Sheila Sanders; Tad Gerlinger; Craig Della Valle; Joshua J Jacobs; Aaron G Rosenberg Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Geoffrey F Dervin; Susan M Madden; Barbara A Crawford-Newton; Alan T Lane; Holly C Evans Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2012-03-28 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Scott T Lovald; Kevin L Ong; Edmund C Lau; Girish P Joshi; Steven M Kurtz; Arthur L Malkani Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2015-05-30 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Robert Pivec; Kimona Issa; Qais Naziri; Bhaveen H Kapadia; Peter M Bonutti; Michael A Mont Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2014-02-27 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Lawrence D Dorr; Deborah J Thomas; Jinjun Zhu; Manish Dastane; Lisa Chao; William T Long Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2009-07-28 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Joseph S Gondusky; Leera Choi; Naila Khalaf; Jay Patel; Steven Barnett; Robert Gorab Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2013-10-31 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Alexander Hoorntje; Koen L M Koenraadt; Margreet G Boevé; Rutger C I van Geenen Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2017-02-22 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: M G M Schotanus; Y F L Bemelmans; B Grimm; I C Heyligers; N P Kort Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2016-08-04 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Timothy S Leroux; William A Zuke; Bryan M Saltzman; Beatrice Go; Nikhil N Verma; Anthony A Romeo; Jason Hurst; Brian Forsythe Journal: JSES Open Access Date: 2018-02-15