| Literature DB >> 27106875 |
Md Humayun Kabir1, A M Abd El-Aty2,3, Sung-Woo Kim1, Han Sol Lee1, Md Musfiqur Rahman1, Young-Jun Lee1, Hyung Suk Chung1, Truong Lieu1, Jeong-Heui Choi1, Ho-Chul Shin4, Geon-Jae Im5, Su Myeong Hong5, Jae-Han Shim6.
Abstract
This study was conducted to characterize the residual level and perform a risk assessment on buprofezin formulated as an emulsifiable concentrate, wettable powder, and suspension concentrate over various treatment schedules in plum (Prunus domestica). The samples were extracted with an AOAC quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe, 'QuEChERS', method after major modifications. As intrinsic interferences were observed in blank plum samples following dispersive-solid phase extraction (consisting of primary secondary amine and C18 sorbents), amino cartridges were used for solid-phase extraction. Analysis was carried out using liquid chromatography with diode array detection and confirmed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The method showed excellent linearity with determination coefficient (R2 = 1) and satisfactory recoveries (at two spiking levels, 0.5 and 2.5 mg/kg) between 90.98 and 94.74% with relative standard deviation (RSD) ≤8%. The limit of quantification (0.05 mg/kg) was considerably lower than the maximum residue limit (2 mg/kg) set by the Codex Alimentarius. Absolute residue levels for emulsifiable concentrates were highest, perhaps owing to the dilution rate and adjuvant. Notably, all formulation residues were lower than the maximum residue limit, and safety data proved that the fruits are safe for consumers.Entities:
Keywords: Buprofezin; LC-DAD; QuEChERS; emulsifiable concentrates; suspension concentrates; wettable powder
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27106875 DOI: 10.1002/bmc.3745
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Chromatogr ISSN: 0269-3879 Impact factor: 1.902