Literature DB >> 27106666

More or less: spontaneous quantity discrimination in the domestic cat.

Oxána Bánszegi1, Andrea Urrutia2, Péter Szenczi3, Robyn Hudson2.   

Abstract

We examined spontaneous quantity discrimination in untrained domestic cats in three food choice experiments. In Experiment 1, we presented the cats with two different quantities of food in eight numerical combinations. Overall, the subjects chose the larger quantity more often than the smaller one, and significantly so when the ratio between the quantities was less than 0.5. In Experiment 2, we presented the cats with two pieces of food in four different size combinations. Again, subjects chose the larger piece above chance, although not in the combination where the largest item was presented. In Experiment 3, a subset of the cats was presented multiple times with two different quantities of food, which were hidden from view. In this case, the cats did not choose the larger quantity more often than the smaller one, suggesting that in the present experiments they mainly used visual cues when comparing quantities. We conclude that domestic cats are capable of spontaneously discriminating quantities when faced with different numbers or sizes of food items, and we suggest why they may not always be motivated to choose the larger quantity. In doing so, we highlight the advantages of testing spontaneous choice behavior, which is more likely to reflect animals' everyday manner of responding than is the case when training them in order to test their absolute limits of performance which may not always coincide with their daily needs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognition; Ecological relevance; Felis silvestris catus; Number discrimination; Size discrimination; Spontaneous responding

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27106666     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-016-0985-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  9 in total

Review 1.  Numerical assessment in the wild: insights from social carnivores.

Authors:  Sarah Benson-Amram; Geoff Gilfillan; Karen McComb
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-02-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Revisiting more or less: influence of numerosity and size on potential prey choice in the domestic cat.

Authors:  Jimena Chacha; Péter Szenczi; Daniel González; Sandra Martínez-Byer; Robyn Hudson; Oxána Bánszegi
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Quantity Discrimination in Trained Lizards (Podarcis sicula).

Authors:  Maria Elena Miletto Petrazzini; Cristiano Bertolucci; Augusto Foà
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-03-07

4.  Visuo-spatial (but not verbal) executive working memory capacity modulates susceptibility to non-numerical visual magnitudes during numerosity comparison.

Authors:  Kyungmin Lee; Soohyun Cho
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Zebrafish excel in number discrimination under an operant conditioning paradigm.

Authors:  Angelo Bisazza; Maria Santacà
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 2.899

6.  Neurons in the Dorso-Central Division of Zebrafish Pallium Respond to Change in Visual Numerosity.

Authors:  Andrea Messina; Davide Potrich; Ilaria Schiona; Valeria Anna Sovrano; Scott E Fraser; Caroline H Brennan; Giorgio Vallortigara
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 7.  The Challenge of Illusory Perception of Animals: The Impact of Methodological Variability in Cross-Species Investigation.

Authors:  Maria Santacà; Christian Agrillo; Maria Elena Miletto Petrazzini
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Use of numerical and spatial information in ordinal counting by zebrafish.

Authors:  Davide Potrich; Rosa Rugani; Valeria Anna Sovrano; Lucia Regolin; Giorgio Vallortigara
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The role of item size on choosing contrasted food quantities in angelfish (Pterophyllum scalare).

Authors:  Luis M Gómez-Laplaza; Laura Romero; Robert Gerlai
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.