Jeffrey D Kravetz1, Robert F Walsh2. 1. VA Connecticut Health Care System, West Haven, CT, USA Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA jeffrey.kravetz@va.gov. 2. VA Connecticut Health Care System, West Haven, CT, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Hypertension is the most common condition seen in primary care, occurring in 1 in 3 adults in the United States. The patient-centered medical home provides an opportunity for proactive, team-based care of hypertension. The purpose of this pilot study was to measure the effectiveness of a team-based approach to blood pressure management in a busy, primary care setting. METHODS: Using panel management within 2 primary care clinics, a cohort of patients with blood pressures >160/100 mm Hg, was identified. The patients at 1 clinic were contacted by the primary care team and offered multiple interventions aimed at improving blood pressure control; including discussion of medication compliance, medication titration, home blood pressure monitoring, nutritional counseling, and motivational interviewing. The change in blood pressure for these patients at 4 months was compared to a parallel primary care clinic within the same medical center whose patients were treated with usual primary care. RESULTS:A total of 350 and 315 patients were included in the intervention and usual care cohorts, respectively. At 4 months, the decrease of systolic blood pressure in the intervention group was significantly greater than in the usual care group (15.6 vs 9.9 mm Hg; P < .001). Sixty-two percent of patients in the intervention group had lower systolic blood pressures post intervention, compared with 41% of usual care patients (P < .001). Reduction in diastolic blood pressure occurred in 54% of intervention patients, compared with 37% of usual care patients (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate the effectiveness of a team-based approach to blood pressure management. This can provide a framework for implementation of team-based care for hypertension in the patient-centered medical home.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE:Hypertension is the most common condition seen in primary care, occurring in 1 in 3 adults in the United States. The patient-centered medical home provides an opportunity for proactive, team-based care of hypertension. The purpose of this pilot study was to measure the effectiveness of a team-based approach to blood pressure management in a busy, primary care setting. METHODS: Using panel management within 2 primary care clinics, a cohort of patients with blood pressures >160/100 mm Hg, was identified. The patients at 1 clinic were contacted by the primary care team and offered multiple interventions aimed at improving blood pressure control; including discussion of medication compliance, medication titration, home blood pressure monitoring, nutritional counseling, and motivational interviewing. The change in blood pressure for these patients at 4 months was compared to a parallel primary care clinic within the same medical center whose patients were treated with usual primary care. RESULTS: A total of 350 and 315 patients were included in the intervention and usual care cohorts, respectively. At 4 months, the decrease of systolic blood pressure in the intervention group was significantly greater than in the usual care group (15.6 vs 9.9 mm Hg; P < .001). Sixty-two percent of patients in the intervention group had lower systolic blood pressures post intervention, compared with 41% of usual care patients (P < .001). Reduction in diastolic blood pressure occurred in 54% of intervention patients, compared with 37% of usual care patients (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate the effectiveness of a team-based approach to blood pressure management. This can provide a framework for implementation of team-based care for hypertension in the patient-centered medical home.
Authors: Alan S Go; Dariush Mozaffarian; Véronique L Roger; Emelia J Benjamin; Jarett D Berry; Michael J Blaha; Shifan Dai; Earl S Ford; Caroline S Fox; Sheila Franco; Heather J Fullerton; Cathleen Gillespie; Susan M Hailpern; John A Heit; Virginia J Howard; Mark D Huffman; Suzanne E Judd; Brett M Kissela; Steven J Kittner; Daniel T Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Rachel H Mackey; David J Magid; Gregory M Marcus; Ariane Marelli; David B Matchar; Darren K McGuire; Emile R Mohler; Claudia S Moy; Michael E Mussolino; Robert W Neumar; Graham Nichol; Dilip K Pandey; Nina P Paynter; Matthew J Reeves; Paul D Sorlie; Joel Stein; Amytis Towfighi; Tanya N Turan; Salim S Virani; Nathan D Wong; Daniel Woo; Melanie B Turner Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-12-18 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Alan J Zillich; Heather A Jaynes; Susan D Bex; Amy S Boldt; Cassandra M Walston; Darin C Ramsey; Jason M Sutherland; Dawn M Bravata Journal: Am J Med Date: 2014-12-20 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Julia J Smith; Janet M Johnston; Vanessa Y Hiratsuka; Denise A Dillard; Steve Tierney; David L Driscoll Journal: Prim Care Diabetes Date: 2014-08-02 Impact factor: 2.459
Authors: Karin M Nelson; Christian Helfrich; Haili Sun; Paul L Hebert; Chuan-Fen Liu; Emily Dolan; Leslie Taylor; Edwin Wong; Charles Maynard; Susan E Hernandez; William Sanders; Ian Randall; Idamay Curtis; Gordon Schectman; Richard Stark; Stephan D Fihn Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Marie Krousel-Wood; Elizabeth Holt; Cara Joyce; Rachael Ruiz; Adriana Dornelles; Larry S Webber; Donald E Morisky; Edward D Frohlich; Richard N Re; Jiang He; Paul K Whelton; Paul Muntner Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 4.844
Authors: Donna K Arnett; Roger S Blumenthal; Michelle A Albert; Andrew B Buroker; Zachary D Goldberger; Ellen J Hahn; Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb; Amit Khera; Donald Lloyd-Jones; J William McEvoy; Erin D Michos; Michael D Miedema; Daniel Muñoz; Sidney C Smith; Salim S Virani; Kim A Williams; Joseph Yeboah; Boback Ziaeian Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2019-03-17 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Donna K Arnett; Roger S Blumenthal; Michelle A Albert; Andrew B Buroker; Zachary D Goldberger; Ellen J Hahn; Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb; Amit Khera; Donald Lloyd-Jones; J William McEvoy; Erin D Michos; Michael D Miedema; Daniel Muñoz; Sidney C Smith; Salim S Virani; Kim A Williams; Joseph Yeboah; Boback Ziaeian Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2019-03-17 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Mia T Vogel; Miruna Petrescu-Prahova; Lesley Steinman; Cate Clegg-Thorp; Cheryl Farmer; Sara Eve Sarliker; Laura-Mae Baldwin Journal: Health Promot Pract Date: 2019-06-11
Authors: Donna K Arnett; Roger S Blumenthal; Michelle A Albert; Andrew B Buroker; Zachary D Goldberger; Ellen J Hahn; Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb; Amit Khera; Donald Lloyd-Jones; J William McEvoy; Erin D Michos; Michael D Miedema; Daniel Muñoz; Sidney C Smith; Salim S Virani; Kim A Williams; Joseph Yeboah; Boback Ziaeian Journal: Circulation Date: 2019-03-17 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Donna K Arnett; Roger S Blumenthal; Michelle A Albert; Andrew B Buroker; Zachary D Goldberger; Ellen J Hahn; Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb; Amit Khera; Donald Lloyd-Jones; J William McEvoy; Erin D Michos; Michael D Miedema; Daniel Muñoz; Sidney C Smith; Salim S Virani; Kim A Williams; Joseph Yeboah; Boback Ziaeian Journal: Circulation Date: 2019-03-17 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Catherine P Kaminetzky; Lauren A Beste; Anne P Poppe; Daniel B Doan; Howard K Mun; Nancy Fugate Woods; Joyce E Wipf Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2017-12-22 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: David A Stupplebeen; Catherine M Pirkle; Tetine L Sentell; Blythe M I Nett; Lindsey S K Ilagan; Bryan Juan; Jared Medeiros; L Brooke Keliikoa Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2020-06-25 Impact factor: 2.830