Luke J Heales1,2, Michael J G Bergin1, Bill Vicenzino1, Paul W Hodges3. 1. NHMRC Centre of Clinical Research Excellence in Spinal Pain, Injury and Health, School of Health and Rehabilitation Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia. 2. School of Human, Health and Social Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD, 4701, Australia. 3. NHMRC Centre of Clinical Research Excellence in Spinal Pain, Injury and Health, School of Health and Rehabilitation Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia. p.hodges@uq.edu.au.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lateral epicondylalgia (LE) refers to pain at the lateral elbow and is associated with sensory and motor impairments that may impact on neuromuscular control and coordination. OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to systematically identify and analyse the literature related to the comparison of neuromuscular control of forearm muscles between individuals with and without LE. METHODS: A comprehensive search of electronic databases and reference lists using keywords relating to neuromuscular control and LE was undertaken. Studies that investigated electromyography (EMG) measures of forearm muscles in individuals with symptoms of LE were included if the study involved comparison with pain-free controls. The Epidemiological Appraisal Instrument was used to assess study quality. Data extracted from each study were used to calculate the standardised mean difference and 95 % confidence intervals to investigate differences between groups. RESULTS: The search revealed a total of 1920 studies, of which seven were included from 44 that underwent detailed review. Due to differences in outcome measures and tasks assessed, meta-analysis was not possible. The seven included studies used 60 different EMG outcomes, of which 16 (27 %) revealed significant differences between groups. Two were properties of motor unit potentials during wrist extension. Four were measures of increased time between recruitment of wrist extensor muscles and onset of grip force. Seven were measures of amplitude of EMG during tennis strokes. Three were measures of motor cortex organisation. CONCLUSION: Features of neuromuscular control differ between individuals with LE and pain-free controls. This implies potential central nervous system involvement and indicates that rehabilitation may be enhanced by consideration of neuromuscular control in addition to other treatments.
BACKGROUND:Lateral epicondylalgia (LE) refers to pain at the lateral elbow and is associated with sensory and motor impairments that may impact on neuromuscular control and coordination. OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to systematically identify and analyse the literature related to the comparison of neuromuscular control of forearm muscles between individuals with and without LE. METHODS: A comprehensive search of electronic databases and reference lists using keywords relating to neuromuscular control and LE was undertaken. Studies that investigated electromyography (EMG) measures of forearm muscles in individuals with symptoms of LE were included if the study involved comparison with pain-free controls. The Epidemiological Appraisal Instrument was used to assess study quality. Data extracted from each study were used to calculate the standardised mean difference and 95 % confidence intervals to investigate differences between groups. RESULTS: The search revealed a total of 1920 studies, of which seven were included from 44 that underwent detailed review. Due to differences in outcome measures and tasks assessed, meta-analysis was not possible. The seven included studies used 60 different EMG outcomes, of which 16 (27 %) revealed significant differences between groups. Two were properties of motor unit potentials during wrist extension. Four were measures of increased time between recruitment of wrist extensor muscles and onset of grip force. Seven were measures of amplitude of EMG during tennis strokes. Three were measures of motor cortex organisation. CONCLUSION: Features of neuromuscular control differ between individuals with LE and pain-free controls. This implies potential central nervous system involvement and indicates that rehabilitation may be enhanced by consideration of neuromuscular control in addition to other treatments.
Authors: Dayna Levin; Levon N Nazarian; Theodore T Miller; Patrick L O'Kane; Rick I Feld; Laurence Parker; John M McShane Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-08-18 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Omid Alizadehkhaiyat; Anthony C Fisher; Graham J Kemp; Karthik Vishwanathan; Simon P Frostick Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Annelies G Maenhout; Tanneke Palmans; Martine De Muynck; Lieven F De Wilde; Ann M Cools Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2011-10-28 Impact factor: 3.019
Authors: Paul W Hodges; Gregory James; Linda Blomster; Leanne Hall; Annina Schmid; Cindy Shu; Chris Little; James Melrose Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2015-07-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Steven J Obst; Luke J Heales; Benjamin L Schrader; Scott A Davis; Keely A Dodd; Cory J Holzberger; Louis B Beavis; Rod S Barrett Journal: Sports Med Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 11.136