Literature DB >> 27106393

The influence of naturalistic, directionally non-specific motion on the spatial deployment of visual attention in right-hemispheric stroke.

Dario Cazzoli1, Simone Hopfner2, Basil Preisig3, Giuseppe Zito4, Tim Vanbellingen5, Michael Jäger6, Tobias Nef6, Urs Mosimann7, Stephan Bohlhalter5, René M Müri8, Thomas Nyffeler9.   

Abstract

An impairment of the spatial deployment of visual attention during exploration of static (i.e., motionless) stimuli is a common finding after an acute, right-hemispheric stroke. However, less is known about how these deficits: (a) are modulated through naturalistic motion (i.e., without directional, specific spatial features); and, (b) evolve in the subacute/chronic post-stroke phase. In the present study, we investigated free visual exploration in three patient groups with subacute/chronic right-hemispheric stroke and in healthy subjects. The first group included patients with left visual neglect and a left visual field defect (VFD), the second patients with a left VFD but no neglect, and the third patients without neglect or VFD. Eye movements were measured in all participants while they freely explored a traffic scene without (static condition) and with (dynamic condition) naturalistic motion, i.e., cars moving from the right or left. In the static condition, all patient groups showed similar deployment of visual exploration (i.e., as measured by the cumulative fixation duration) as compared to healthy subjects, suggesting that recovery processes took place, with normal spatial allocation of attention. However, the more demanding dynamic condition with moving cars elicited different re-distribution patterns of visual attention, quite similar to those typically observed in acute stroke. Neglect patients with VFD showed a significant decrease of visual exploration in the contralesional space, whereas patients with VFD but no neglect showed a significant increase of visual exploration in the contralesional space. No differences, as compared to healthy subjects, were found in patients without neglect or VFD. These results suggest that naturalistic motion, without directional, specific spatial features, may critically influence the spatial distribution of visual attention in subacute/chronic stroke patients. Copyright Â
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Everyday relevant setting; Eye-movements; Hemispatial neglect; Motion; Subacute/chronic stroke; Visual attention deployment

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27106393     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.04.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  4 in total

1.  Advanced lesion symptom mapping analyses and implementation as BCBtoolkit.

Authors:  Chris Foulon; Leonardo Cerliani; Serge Kinkingnéhun; Richard Levy; Charlotte Rosso; Marika Urbanski; Emmanuelle Volle; Michel Thiebaut de Schotten
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 6.524

2.  Biomechanical adaptation to post-stroke visual field loss: a systematic review.

Authors:  Adel Elfeky; Kristiaan D'Août; Rebecca Lawson; Lauren R Hepworth; Nicholas D A Thomas; Abigail Clynch; Fiona J Rowe
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-27

3.  Spatial Neglect Midline Diagnostics From Virtual Reality and Eye Tracking in a Free-Viewing Environment.

Authors:  Bastian I Hougaard; Hendrik Knoche; Jim Jensen; Lars Evald
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-11-29

4.  Virtual Reality and Eye-Tracking Assessment, and Treatment of Unilateral Spatial Neglect: Systematic Review and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Alexander Pilgaard Kaiser; Kristian Westergaard Villadsen; Afshin Samani; Hendrik Knoche; Lars Evald
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.