Literature DB >> 27106391

When will a stuttering moment occur? The determining role of speech motor preparation.

Sarah Vanhoutte1, Marjan Cosyns2, Pieter van Mierlo3, Katja Batens4, Paul Corthals5, Miet De Letter6, John Van Borsel7, Patrick Santens8.   

Abstract

The present study aimed to evaluate whether increased activity related to speech motor preparation preceding fluently produced words reflects a successful compensation strategy in stuttering. For this purpose, a contingent negative variation (CNV) was evoked during a picture naming task and measured by use of electro-encephalography. A CNV is a slow, negative event-related potential known to reflect motor preparation generated by the basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical (BGTC) - loop. In a previous analysis, the CNV of 25 adults with developmental stuttering (AWS) was significantly increased, especially over the right hemisphere, compared to the CNV of 35 fluent speakers (FS) when both groups were speaking fluently (Vanhoutte et al., (2015) doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.05.013). To elucidate whether this increase is a compensation strategy enabling fluent speech in AWS, the present analysis evaluated the CNV of 7 AWS who stuttered during this picture naming task. The CNV preceding AWS stuttered words was statistically compared to the CNV preceding AWS fluent words and FS fluent words. Though no difference emerged between the CNV of the AWS stuttered words and the FS fluent words, a significant reduction was observed when comparing the CNV preceding AWS stuttered words to the CNV preceding AWS fluent words. The latter seems to confirm the compensation hypothesis: the increased CNV prior to AWS fluent words is a successful compensation strategy, especially when it occurs over the right hemisphere. The words are produced fluently because of an enlarged activity during speech motor preparation. The left CNV preceding AWS stuttered words correlated negatively with stuttering frequency and severity suggestive for a link between the left BGTC - network and the stuttering pathology. Overall, speech motor preparatory activity generated by the BGTC - loop seems to have a determining role in stuttering. An important divergence between left and right hemisphere is hypothesized.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Basal ganglia; Compensation; Contingent negative variation; Motor preparation; Stuttering frequency; Stuttering severity

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27106391     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.04.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  7 in total

1.  Functional and Neuroanatomical Bases of Developmental Stuttering: Current Insights.

Authors:  Soo-Eun Chang; Emily O Garnett; Andrew Etchell; Ho Ming Chow
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 7.519

2.  Shifted dynamic interactions between subcortical nuclei and inferior frontal gyri during response preparation in persistent developmental stuttering.

Authors:  F Luise Metzger; Tibor Auer; Gunther Helms; Walter Paulus; Jens Frahm; Martin Sommer; Nicole E Neef
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 3.270

3.  Cortical dynamics of disfluency in adults who stutter.

Authors:  Ranit Sengupta; Shalin Shah; Torrey M J Loucks; Kristin Pelczarski; J Scott Yaruss; Katie Gore; Sazzad M Nasir
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2017-05

4.  No Evidence for Dystonia-Like Sensory Overflow of Tongue Representations in Adults Who Stutter.

Authors:  Sarah M E Vreeswijk; T N Linh Hoang; Alexandra Korzeczek; Nicole E Neef; Alexander Wolff von Gudenberg; Walter Paulus; Martin Sommer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  The Application of EEG Mu Rhythm Measures to Neurophysiological Research in Stuttering.

Authors:  David Jenson; Andrew L Bowers; Daniel Hudock; Tim Saltuklaroglu
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 3.473

6.  A Neural Marker of Speech Intention: Evidence From Contingent Negative Variation.

Authors:  Juhi Kidwai; Jonathan S Brumberg; Brianna M Marsh
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Theta Modulated Neural Phase Coherence Facilitates Speech Fluency in Adults Who Stutter.

Authors:  Ranit Sengupta; J Scott Yaruss; Torrey M Loucks; Vincent L Gracco; Kristin Pelczarski; Sazzad M Nasir
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 3.169

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.