Literature DB >> 27106306

Rate discrimination at low pulse rates in normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners: Influence of intracochlear stimulation site.

Pierre Stahl1, Olivier Macherey1, Sabine Meunier1, Stéphane Roman2.   

Abstract

Temporal pitch perception in cochlear implantees remains weaker than in normal hearing listeners and is usually limited to rates below about 300 pulses per second (pps). Recent studies have suggested that stimulating the apical part of the cochlea may improve the temporal coding of pitch by cochlear implants (CIs), compared to stimulating other sites. The present study focuses on rate discrimination at low pulse rates (ranging from 20 to 104 pps). Two experiments measured and compared pulse rate difference limens (DLs) at four fundamental frequencies (ranging from 20 to 104 Hz) in both CI and normal-hearing (NH) listeners. Experiment 1 measured DLs in users of the (Med-El CI, Innsbruck, Austria) device for two electrodes (one apical and one basal). In experiment 2, DLs for NH listeners were compared for unresolved harmonic complex tones filtered in two frequency regions (lower cut-off frequencies of 1200 and 3600 Hz, respectively) and for different bandwidths. Pulse rate discrimination performance was significantly better when stimulation was provided by the apical electrode in CI users and by the lower-frequency tone complexes in NH listeners. This set of data appears consistent with better temporal coding when stimulation originates from apical regions of the cochlea.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27106306     DOI: 10.1121/1.4944564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  13 in total

1.  Neural Processing of Acoustic and Electric Interaural Time Differences in Normal-Hearing Gerbils.

Authors:  Maike Vollmer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The relationship between time and place coding with cochlear implants with long electrode arrays.

Authors:  David M Landsberger; Jeremy Marozeau; Griet Mertens; Paul Van de Heyning
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Pulse-rate discrimination deficit in cochlear implant users: is the upper limit of pitch peripheral or central?

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Juliana Mathews; Lixue Dong
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Temporal-pitch sensitivity in electric hearing with amplitude modulation and inserted pulses with short inter-pulse intervals.

Authors:  Martin J Lindenbeck; Bernhard Laback; Piotr Majdak; Sridhar Srinivasan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Stimulating the Cochlear Apex Without Longer Electrodes: Preliminary Results With a New Approach.

Authors:  David M Landsberger; Natalia Stupak; Emily R Spitzer; Lavin Entwisle; Laurel Mahoney; Susan B Waltzman; Sean McMenomey; David R Friedmann; Mario A Svirsky; William Shapiro; J Thomas Roland
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 2.619

6.  Rate discrimination, gap detection and ranking of temporal pitch in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Stefano Cosentino; Robert P Carlyon; John M Deeks; Wendy Parkinson; Julie A Bierer
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-04-21

7.  Evaluation of Possible Effects of a Potassium Channel Modulator on Temporal Processing by Cochlear Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon; John M Deeks; François Guérit; Wiebke Lamping; Alexander J Billig; Charles H Large; Shakeel R Saeed; Peter Harris
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-09-19

8.  Perceptual learning of pitch provided by cochlear implant stimulation rate.

Authors:  Susan R S Bissmeyer; Shaikat Hossain; Raymond L Goldsworthy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Encoding a Melody Using Only Temporal Information for Cochlear-Implant and Normal-Hearing Listeners.

Authors:  Ann E Todd; Griet Mertens; Paul Van de Heyning; David M Landsberger
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Temporal Regularity Detection and Rate Discrimination in Cochlear-Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Etienne Gaudrain; John M Deeks; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-09-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.