Robin Michelet1, Lien Dossche2, Pauline De Bruyne2, Pieter Colin3,4, Koen Boussery3, Johan Vande Walle5, Jan Van Bocxlaer3, An Vermeulen3. 1. Laboratory of Medical Biochemistry and Clinical Analysis, Department of Bioanalysis, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. robin.michelet@ugent.be. 2. Department of Pediatrics and Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. 3. Laboratory of Medical Biochemistry and Clinical Analysis, Department of Bioanalysis, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. 4. Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION:Desmopressin is used for treatment of nocturnal enuresis in children. In this study, we investigated the pharmacokinetics of two formulations-a tablet and a lyophilisate-in both fasted and fed children. METHODS: Previously published data from two studies (one in 22 children aged 6-16 years, and the other in 25 children aged 6-13 years) were analyzed using population pharmacokinetic modeling. A one-compartment model with first-order absorption was fitted to the data. Covariates were selected using a forward selection procedure. The final model was evaluated, and sensitivity analysis was performed to improve future sampling designs. Simulations were subsequently performed to further explore the relative bioavailability of both formulations and the food effect. RESULTS: The final model described the plasma desmopressin concentrations adequately. The formulation and the fed state were included as covariates on the relative bioavailability. The lyophilisate was, on average, 32.1 % more available than the tablet, and fasted children exhibited an average increase in the relative bioavailability of 101 % in comparison with fed children. Body weight was included as a covariate on distribution volume, using a power function with an exponent of 0.402. Simulations suggested that both the formulation and the food effect were clinically relevant. CONCLUSION: Bioequivalence data on two formulations of the same drug in adults cannot be readily extrapolated to children. This was the first study in children suggesting that the two desmopressin formulations are not bioequivalent in children at the currently approved dose levels. Furthermore, the effect of food intake was found to be clinically relevant. Sampling times for a future study were suggested. This sampling design should result in more informative data and consequently generate a more robust model.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: Desmopressin is used for treatment of nocturnal enuresis in children. In this study, we investigated the pharmacokinetics of two formulations-a tablet and a lyophilisate-in both fasted and fed children. METHODS: Previously published data from two studies (one in 22 children aged 6-16 years, and the other in 25 children aged 6-13 years) were analyzed using population pharmacokinetic modeling. A one-compartment model with first-order absorption was fitted to the data. Covariates were selected using a forward selection procedure. The final model was evaluated, and sensitivity analysis was performed to improve future sampling designs. Simulations were subsequently performed to further explore the relative bioavailability of both formulations and the food effect. RESULTS: The final model described the plasma desmopressin concentrations adequately. The formulation and the fed state were included as covariates on the relative bioavailability. The lyophilisate was, on average, 32.1 % more available than the tablet, and fasted children exhibited an average increase in the relative bioavailability of 101 % in comparison with fed children. Body weight was included as a covariate on distribution volume, using a power function with an exponent of 0.402. Simulations suggested that both the formulation and the food effect were clinically relevant. CONCLUSION: Bioequivalence data on two formulations of the same drug in adults cannot be readily extrapolated to children. This was the first study in children suggesting that the two desmopressin formulations are not bioequivalent in children at the currently approved dose levels. Furthermore, the effect of food intake was found to be clinically relevant. Sampling times for a future study were suggested. This sampling design should result in more informative data and consequently generate a more robust model.
Authors: Pauline De Bruyne; Ann De Guchtenaere; Charlotte Van Herzeele; Ann Raes; Jo Dehoorne; Piet Hoebeke; Erik Van Laecke; Johan Vande Walle Journal: Eur J Pediatr Date: 2013-08-30 Impact factor: 3.183
Authors: Barbara Lucchini; Giacomo D Simonetti; Alessandro Ceschi; Sebastiano A G Lava; Pietro B Faré; Mario G Bianchetti Journal: J Pediatr Urol Date: 2013-04-22 Impact factor: 1.830
Authors: Robin Michelet; Lien Dossche; Charlotte Van Herzeele; Jan Van Bocxlaer; An Vermeulen; Johan Vande Walle Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2017-12-03 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Robin Michelet; Lien Dossche; Charlotte Van Herzeele; Pauline De Bruyne; Elke Gasthuys; Jan Van Bocxlaer; Johan Vande Walle; An Vermeulen Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Elke Gasthuys; An Vermeulen; Siska Croubels; Joske Millecam; Stijn Schauvliege; Thomas van Bergen; Pauline De Bruyne; Johan Vande Walle; Mathias Devreese Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2018-01-31 Impact factor: 5.810