Literature DB >> 27106080

New paradigms in chemokine receptor signal transduction: Moving beyond the two-site model.

Andrew B Kleist1, Anthony E Getschman2, Joshua J Ziarek3, Amanda M Nevins4, Pierre-Arnaud Gauthier5, Andy Chevigné6, Martyna Szpakowska7, Brian F Volkman8.   

Abstract

Chemokine receptor (CKR) signaling forms the basis of essential immune cellular functions, and dysregulated CKR signaling underpins numerous disease processes of the immune system and beyond. CKRs, which belong to the seven transmembrane domain receptor (7TMR) superfamily, initiate signaling upon binding of endogenous, secreted chemokine ligands. Chemokine-CKR interactions are traditionally described by a two-step/two-site mechanism, in which the CKR N-terminus recognizes the chemokine globular core (i.e. site 1 interaction), followed by activation when the unstructured chemokine N-terminus is inserted into the receptor TM bundle (i.e. site 2 interaction). Several recent studies challenge the structural independence of sites 1 and 2 by demonstrating physical and allosteric links between these supposedly separate sites. Others contest the functional independence of these sites, identifying nuanced roles for site 1 and other interactions in CKR activation. These developments emerge within a rapidly changing landscape in which CKR signaling is influenced by receptor PTMs, chemokine and CKR dimerization, and endogenous non-chemokine ligands. Simultaneous advances in the structural and functional characterization of 7TMR biased signaling have altered how we understand promiscuous chemokine-CKR interactions. In this review, we explore new paradigms in CKR signal transduction by considering studies that depict a more intricate architecture governing the consequences of chemokine-CKR interactions. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  7TMR activation; Biased agonism; Chemokine stoichiometry; Seven transmembrane-spanning receptor (7TMR); Two-site model

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27106080      PMCID: PMC5145291          DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2016.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol        ISSN: 0006-2952            Impact factor:   5.858


  224 in total

1.  Recognition of a CXCR4 sulfotyrosine by the chemokine stromal cell-derived factor-1alpha (SDF-1alpha/CXCL12).

Authors:  Christopher T Veldkamp; Christoph Seibert; Francis C Peterson; Thomas P Sakmar; Brian F Volkman
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  CXCR4-CCR5: a couple modulating T cell functions.

Authors:  Rita Lucia Contento; Barbara Molon; Cedric Boularan; Tullio Pozzan; Santos Manes; Stefano Marullo; Antonella Viola
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Solution structure and dynamics of the CX3C chemokine domain of fractalkine and its interaction with an N-terminal fragment of CX3CR1.

Authors:  L S Mizoue; J F Bazan; E C Johnson; T M Handel
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1999-02-02       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 4.  The structural role of receptor tyrosine sulfation in chemokine recognition.

Authors:  Justin P Ludeman; Martin J Stone
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 8.739

5.  CXCR3 internalization following T cell-endothelial cell contact: preferential role of IFN-inducible T cell alpha chemoattractant (CXCL11).

Authors:  A Sauty; R A Colvin; L Wagner; S Rochat; F Spertini; A D Luster
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 5.422

6.  Tyrosine sulfation of the amino terminus of CCR5 facilitates HIV-1 entry.

Authors:  M Farzan; T Mirzabekov; P Kolchinsky; R Wyatt; M Cayabyab; N P Gerard; C Gerard; J Sodroski; H Choe
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1999-03-05       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Tyrosine sulfation of CCR5 N-terminal peptide by tyrosylprotein sulfotransferases 1 and 2 follows a discrete pattern and temporal sequence.

Authors:  Christoph Seibert; Martine Cadene; Anthony Sanfiz; Brian T Chait; Thomas P Sakmar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-08-08       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Molecular characterization of the chemokine receptor CXCR3: evidence for the involvement of distinct extracellular domains in a multi-step model of ligand binding and receptor activation.

Authors:  Georgina Xanthou; Timothy J Williams; James E Pease
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.532

9.  Long range effect of mutations on specific conformational changes in the extracellular loop 2 of angiotensin II type 1 receptor.

Authors:  Hamiyet Unal; Rajaganapathi Jagannathan; Anushree Bhatnagar; Kalyan Tirupula; Russell Desnoyer; Sadashiva S Karnik
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 10.  Biased and g protein-independent signaling of chemokine receptors.

Authors:  Anne Steen; Olav Larsen; Stefanie Thiele; Mette M Rosenkilde
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 7.561

View more
  46 in total

1.  Biased agonists of the chemokine receptor CXCR3 differentially control chemotaxis and inflammation.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Smith; Lowell T Nicholson; Jutamas Suwanpradid; Rachel A Glenn; Nicole M Knape; Priya Alagesan; Jaimee N Gundry; Thomas S Wehrman; Amber Reck Atwater; Michael D Gunn; Amanda S MacLeod; Sudarshan Rajagopal
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 8.192

2.  Evaluation and extension of the two-site, two-step model for binding and activation of the chemokine receptor CCR1.

Authors:  Julie Sanchez; Zil E Huma; J Robert Lane; Xuyu Liu; Jessica L Bridgford; Richard J Payne; Meritxell Canals; Martin J Stone
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Different contributions of chemokine N-terminal features attest to a different ligand binding mode and a bias towards activation of ACKR3/CXCR7 compared with CXCR4 and CXCR3.

Authors:  Martyna Szpakowska; Amanda M Nevins; Max Meyrath; David Rhainds; Thomas D'huys; François Guité-Vinet; Nadine Dupuis; Pierre-Arnaud Gauthier; Manuel Counson; Andrew Kleist; Geneviève St-Onge; Julien Hanson; Dominique Schols; Brian F Volkman; Nikolaus Heveker; Andy Chevigné
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 4.  Extramembranous Regions in G Protein-Coupled Receptors: Cinderella in Receptor Biology?

Authors:  Sreetama Pal; Amitabha Chattopadhyay
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 1.843

5.  The chemokine X-factor: Structure-function analysis of the CXC motif at CXCR4 and ACKR3.

Authors:  Michael J Wedemeyer; Sarah A Mahn; Anthony E Getschman; Kyler S Crawford; Francis C Peterson; Adriano Marchese; John D McCorvy; Brian F Volkman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Mutational Analysis of Atypical Chemokine Receptor 3 (ACKR3/CXCR7) Interaction with Its Chemokine Ligands CXCL11 and CXCL12.

Authors:  Besma Benredjem; Mélanie Girard; David Rhainds; Geneviève St-Onge; Nikolaus Heveker
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 7.  The unique structural and functional features of CXCL12.

Authors:  Rik Janssens; Sofie Struyf; Paul Proost
Journal:  Cell Mol Immunol       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 11.530

Review 8.  Structural basis of chemokine and receptor interactions: Key regulators of leukocyte recruitment in inflammatory responses.

Authors:  Ram Prasad Bhusal; Simon R Foster; Martin J Stone
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Exploiting agonist biased signaling of chemokines to target cancer.

Authors:  Ishan Roy; Anthony E Getschman; Brian F Volkman; Michael B Dwinell
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 4.784

10.  Modeling the complete chemokine-receptor interaction.

Authors:  Michael J Wedemeyer; Benjamin K Mueller; Brian J Bender; Jens Meiler; Brian F Volkman
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 1.441

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.