Literature DB >> 27105628

Minor Allele Frequency Changes the Nature of Genotype by Environment Interactions.

Brad Verhulst1, Michael C Neale2.   

Abstract

In the classical twin study, phenotypic variation is often partitioned into additive genetic (A), common (C) and specific environment (E) components. From genetical theory, the outcome of genotype by environment interaction is expected to inflate A when the interacting factor is shared (i.e., C) between the members of a twin pair. We show that estimates of both A and C can be inflated. When the shared interacting factor changes the size of the difference between homozygotes' means, the expected sibling or DZ twin correlation is .5 if and only if the minor allele frequency (MAF) is .5; otherwise the expected DZ correlation is greater than this value, consistent (and confounded) with some additional effect of C. This result is considered in the light of the distribution of minor allele frequencies for polygenic traits. Also discussed is whether such interactions take place at the locus level or affect an aggregated biological structure or system. Interactions with structures or endophenotypes that result from the aggregated effects of many loci will generally emerge as part of the A estimate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Additive genetic variance; Bias; Biometrical genetics; Common environment; G × E interaction; Minor allele frequency

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27105628      PMCID: PMC4975612          DOI: 10.1007/s10519-016-9795-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Genet        ISSN: 0001-8244            Impact factor:   2.805


  8 in total

1.  Variance components models for gene-environment interaction in twin analysis.

Authors:  Shaun Purcell
Journal:  Twin Res       Date:  2002-12

2.  The mystery of missing heritability: Genetic interactions create phantom heritability.

Authors:  Or Zuk; Eliana Hechter; Shamil R Sunyaev; Eric S Lander
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Social contact and sibling similarity: facts, issues, and red herrings.

Authors:  R J Rose; J Kaprio; C J Williams; R Viken; K Obremski
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.805

4.  The genetical analysis of covariance structure.

Authors:  N G Martin; L J Eaves
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 5.  Endophenotype: a conceptual analysis.

Authors:  K S Kendler; M C Neale
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 15.992

Review 6.  The endophenotype concept in psychiatry: etymology and strategic intentions.

Authors:  Irving I Gottesman; Todd D Gould
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 18.112

Review 7.  Endophenotypes in the genetic analyses of mental disorders.

Authors:  Tyrone D Cannon; Matthew C Keller
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 18.561

8.  Testing for measured gene-environment interaction: problems with the use of cross-product terms and a regression model reparameterization solution.

Authors:  Fazil Aliev; Shawn J Latendresse; Silviu-Alin Bacanu; Michael C Neale; Danielle M Dick
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2014-02-16       Impact factor: 2.805

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Notes on Three Decades of Methodology Workshops.

Authors:  Hermine H Maes
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2021-02-14       Impact factor: 2.805

2.  The Boulder Workshop Question Box.

Authors:  David M Evans
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 2.805

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.