| Literature DB >> 27105587 |
Adrian E Boström1, Jessica Mwinyi2, Sarah Voisin2, Wenting Wu3, Bernd Schultes4, Kang Zhang3, Helgi B Schiöth2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Essential hypertension is a significant risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. Emerging research suggests a role of DNA methylation in blood pressure physiology. We aimed to investigate epigenetic associations of promoter related CpG sites to essential hypertension in a genome-wide methylation approach.Entities:
Keywords: Bariatric surgery; Corl2; EHMT2; Epigenome-wide association study; Essential hypertension; FUSSEL18; SKOR2; Whole methylome analysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27105587 PMCID: PMC4841955 DOI: 10.1186/s12920-016-0180-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Genomics ISSN: 1755-8794 Impact factor: 3.063
Characteristics of subjects included into the study
| Discovery groupa | Verification cohort | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter | EH | NT | |
|
| 11 | 275 | 264 |
| Men: Women ( | 7:4 | 140 (50.9):135 (49.1) | 127 (48.1):137 (51.9) |
| Caucasian: Hispanic ( | 11:0 | 132 (48.0):143 (52.0) | 97 (36.7):167 (53.3) |
| Age (years, | |||
| 0–19 | – | – | 1 (0.4) |
| 20–29 | 1 (9.1) | – | 10 (3.8) |
| 30–39 | 1 (9.1) | 7 (2.5) | 11 (4.2) |
| 40–49 | 4 (36.4) | 26 (9.5) | 38 (14.4) |
| 50–59 | 3 (27.3) | 70 (25.5) | 48 (18.2) |
| 60–69 | 2 (18.2) | 73 (26.5) | 66 (25.0) |
| 70–79 | – | 59 (21.5) | 51 (19.3) |
| 80–89 | – | 34 (12.4) | 33 (12.5) |
| 90–99 | – | 5 (1.8) | 6 (2.3) |
| 100+ | – | 1 (0.4) | – |
| Mean (SD) | 46.9 (11.9) | 64.9 (13.2) | 62.3 (16.4) |
| Body mass index (BMI) | |||
| BaselineA | 47.9 (6.9) | 29.6 (6.1) | 26.9 (4.8) |
| Post surgeryB | 36.0 (6.7) | – | – |
|
| 6.21E–09 | – | – |
| Diastolic blood pressure | |||
| BaselineA | 91.6 (12.8) | N/A | N/A |
| Post surgeryB | 82.7 (7.2) | – | – |
|
| 1.48E–02 | – | – |
| Systolic blood pressure | |||
| BaselineA | 144.5 (16.0) | N/A | N/A |
| Post surgeryB | 125.9 (14.7) | – | – |
|
| 6.78E–03 | – | – |
Abbreviations: EH essential hypertension, NT normotensive, RYGB Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, N/A not applicable
aThis group comprises patients who underwent RYGB surgery. Values at baseline and post-surgery are shown as mean values (SD). P-values were calculated by means of pairwise t-tests, contrasting values at baseline and six months after RYGB-surgery (p: A vs. B). A one-tailed p-value <0.05 was considered significant
CpG sites significantly correlated with SBP and EH
| Discovery groupa ( | Verification cohortb ( | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % DNA Methylation (SD) | Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients (SBP) | Binary logistic regressions (EH) | ||||||||||
| Gene | Illumina ID | Distance to TSS | BaselineA | After surgeryB |
| Coef. |
|
| % DNA Methylation (SD) | Exp (B) |
|
|
|
| cg00161968 | 27 | 5.36 (1.1) | 5.9 (1.7) |
| 0.93 | <10E–16 | <10E–16 | 7.5 (4.3) | – |
|
|
|
| cg00875989 | 1500 | 33.2 (1.7) | 33.6 (3.6) |
| (0.92) | <10E–16 | <10E–16 | 37.5 (4.2) | 0.92 | 1.16E–03 | 2.79E–02 |
|
| cg06251539 | 375 | 9.3 (2.4) | 8.7 (1.88) |
| 0.92 | <10E–16 | <10E–16 | 14.5 (3.1) | – |
|
|
|
| cg08706258 | 125 | 4.3 (1.1) | 4.2 (0.7) |
| 0.93 | <10E–16 | <10E–16 | 4.8 (0.8) | – |
|
|
|
| cg09134341 | (1332) | 91.0 (2.8) | 91.8 (1.2) |
| (0.92) | <10E–16 | <10E–16 | 89.3 (1.9) | 0.84 | 9.58E–04 | 2.30E–02 |
|
| cg10146710 | 1132 | 2.4 (0.5) | 2.4 (0.4) |
| 0.92 | <10E–16 | <10E–16 | 2.3 (1.0) | – |
|
|
|
| cg10596925 | (242) | 12.1 (3.4) | 13.0 (2.0) |
| 0.95 | <10E–16 | <10E–16 | 10.7 (2.9) | 0.94 | 4.98E–02 |
|
|
| cg10640093 | (196) | 3.8 (1.0) | 4.1 (0.7) |
| 0.94 | <10E–16 | <10E–16 | 3.0 (0.7) | – |
|
|
|
| cg12360759 | 598 | 7.4 (1.7) | 7.4 (1.0) |
| 0.92 | <10E–16 | <10E–16 | 9.1 (1.3 | 0.82 | 6.33E–03 |
|
|
| cg15612682 | 232 | 6.0 (1.5) | 6.1 (0.8) |
| 0.93 | <10E–16 | <10E–16 | 5.6 (1.0) | – |
|
|
|
| cg16076930 | 380 | 19.0 (2.8) | 20.5 (5.1) |
| 0.94 | <10E–16 | <10E–16 | 21.1 (2.8) | – |
|
|
|
| cg16118212 | 227 | 12.7 (4.4) | 10.7 (2.9) |
| 0.92 | <10E–16 | <10E–16 | 17.3 (6.2) | – |
|
|
|
| cg16500810 | (197) | 1.5 (0.3) | 1.6 (0.9) |
| 0.92 | <10E–16 | <10E–16 | 0.6 (0.6) | – |
|
|
|
| cg18643762 | (211) | 2.9 (1.0) | 3.4 (1.0) |
| (0.93) | <10E–16 | <10E–16 | 1.7 (1.3) | – |
|
|
|
| cg20841073 | 648 | 10.7 (2.2) | 10.3 (2.7) |
| 0.93 | <10E–16 | <10E–16 | 5.2 (2.0) | 0.85 | 2.37E–03 |
|
|
| cg21344124 | 302 | 3.2 (0.7) | 2.8 (1.1) |
| 0.92 | <10E–16 | <10E–16 | 2.2 (0.7) | 1.34 | 1.96E–02 |
|
|
| cg21996137 | (185) | 2.0 (0.7) | 1.8 (0.6) |
| 0.92 | <10E–16 | <10E–16 | 1.6 (0.7) | 1.42 | 1.60E–02 |
|
|
| cg22011370 | 525 | 89.9 (2.6) | 89.9 (2.9) |
| (0.95) | <10E–16 | <10E–16 | 90.6 (3.3) | – |
|
|
|
| cg22295383 | (104) | 5.2 (1.3) | 4.9 (1.1) |
| 0.94 | <10E–16 | <10E–16 | 4.2 (1.3) | – |
|
|
|
| cg23945265 | 1003 | 45.4 (4.2) | 46.9 (3.2) |
| (0.92) | <10E–16 | <10E–16 | 45.7 (5.2) | 0.96 | 2.58E–02 |
|
|
| cg25521086 | (58) | 4.0 (0.8) | 3.8 (0.7) |
| 0.95 | <10E–16 | <10E–16 | 3.1 (1.2) | – |
|
|
|
| cg25544164 | 342 | 99.0 (0.3) | 9.1 (0.2) |
| 0.94 | <10E–16 | <10E–16 | 99.1 (0.5) | – |
|
|
Abbreviations: EH essential hypertension, Exp(B) log odds ratio, ns not significant, RYGB Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, SBP systolic blood pressure, SD standard deviation, TSS transcription start site
aThis group comprises patients who underwent RYGB surgery. bResults were derived from binary logistic regressions of EH (yes/no) to % CpG site methylation, age, BMI, ethnicity and sex. Log odds ratios and p-values refer to the CpG site in focus. P-values for DNA methylation levels were calculated by paired t-tests, contrasting methylation levels at baseline and six months after RYGB-surgery (p: A vs. B). GWAS results for SBP were calculated by genome-wide analyses of Spearman's rank correlation coefficients using algorithm AS 89 and an Edgeworth series approximation. Unless specified as SD, parenthesis “()” implies negative numbers
CpG site associations to age, BMI, DBP and glucose
| Discovery cohorta ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients | |||||
| Gene | Illumina ID |
|
|
|
|
|
| cg00161968 | ns | ns | ns | ns |
|
| cg00875989 | ns | ns | ns | ns |
|
| cg06251539 | ns | ns | ns | ns |
|
| cg08706258 | ns | ns | ns | ns |
|
| cg09134341 | ns | ns | ns | ns |
|
| cg10146710 | ns | ns | ns | 2.81E–02 |
|
| cg10596925 | ns | ns | ns | ns |
|
| cg10640093 | ns | ns | ns | ns |
|
| cg12360759 | ns | ns | ns | ns |
|
| cg15612682 | ns | ns | ns | ns |
|
| cg16076930 | ns | ns | ns | ns |
|
| cg16118212 | ns | ns | ns | ns |
|
| cg16500810 | ns | ns | ns | 2.08E–02 |
|
| cg18643762 | ns | ns | ns | ns |
|
| cg20841073 | ns | ns | ns | ns |
|
| cg21344124 | ns | ns | ns | ns |
|
| cg21996137 | ns | ns | ns | ns |
|
| cg22011370 | ns | ns | ns | 4.04E–02 |
|
| cg22295383 | ns | ns | ns | ns |
|
| cg23945265 | ns | ns | ns | 4.78E–02 |
|
| cg25521086 | ns | ns | ns | ns |
|
| cg25544164 | ns | ns | ns | ns |
Abbreviations: DB diastolic blood pressure, ns, not significant, RYGB, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, SBP systolic blood pressure
aCohort comprises patients who underwent RYGB surgery. P-values were derived by analyses of Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients using algorithm AS 89 and an Edgeworth series approximation. For the variables DBP, BMI and fasting plasma glucose, percent change in methylation states were correlated with percent change in these variables, measured before and six months after RYGB surgery. For the variable age, percent change in methylation states measured before and six months after RYGB surgery was correlated with age.
Fig. 1The methyltransferase G9a in cooperation with its homologue G9a-like protein (GLP) is responsible for the majority of dimethylation of H3K9me2. Cells that lack G9a (or GLP) display a drastic reduction in this modification [26]. H3K9me2 acts as a major repressive histone methylation mark in euchromatin, that affects also the interleukin 17 gene locus, resulting in inhibition of IL-17 expression [27]. Harrison et al. demonstrated that mice lacking IL-17 do not develop sustained hypertension after treatment with angiotensin II. In contrast to wild-type mice, IL-17−/− mice do not exhibit an increase in superoxide production and there is no reduction in endothelial-dependent vasodilatation. Furthermore, there was a reduction in vascular accumulation of leukocytes in IL-17−/− mice, probably due to a reduction of chemotaxis normally induced by IL-17 [35]