| Literature DB >> 27105307 |
Theo S Plantinga1,2,3, Marika H Tesselaar1,2,3, Hans Morreau4, Eleonora P M Corssmit5, Brigith K Willemsen3, Benno Kusters3, A C H van Engen-van Grunsven3, Johannes W A Smit1,2, Romana T Netea-Maier1,2.
Abstract
Although non-medullary thyroid cancer (NMTC) generally has a good prognosis, 30-40% of patients with distant metastases develop resistance to radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy due to tumor dedifferentiation. For these patients, treatment options are limited and prognosis is poor. In the present study, expression and activity of autophagy was assessed in large sets of normal, benign and malignant tissues and was correlated with pathology, SLC5A5/hNIS (solute carrier family 5 member 5) protein expression, and with clinical response to RAI ablation therapy in NMTC patients. Fluorescent immunostaining for the autophagy marker LC3 was performed on 100 benign and 80 malignant thyroid tissues. Semiquantitative scoring was generated for both diffuse LC3-I intensity and number of LC3-II-positive puncta and was correlated with SLC5A5 protein expression and clinical parameters. Degree of diffuse LC3-I intensity and number of LC3-II-positive puncta scoring were not discriminative for benign vs. malignant thyroid lesions. Interestingly, however, in NMTC patients significant associations were observed between diffuse LC3-I intensity and LC3-II-positive puncta scoring on the one hand and clinical response to RAI therapy on the other hand (odds ratio [OR] = 3.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] =1.91-5.12, P = 0.01; OR = 5.68, 95%CI = 3.02-10.05, P = 0.002, respectively). Mechanistically, the number of LC3-II-positive puncta correlated with membranous SLC5A5 expression (OR = 7.71, 95%CI = 4.15-11.75, P<0.001), number of RAI treatments required to reach remission (P = 0.014), cumulative RAI dose (P = 0.026) and with overall remission and recurrence rates (P = 0.031). In conclusion, autophagy activity strongly correlates with clinical response of NMTC patients to RAI therapy, potentially by its capacity to maintain tumor cell differentiation and to preserve functional iodide uptake.Entities:
Keywords: LC3; autophagy; puncta; radioactive iodine therapy; thyroid carcinoma
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27105307 PMCID: PMC4990989 DOI: 10.1080/15548627.2016.1174802
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Autophagy ISSN: 1554-8627 Impact factor: 16.016
Figure 1.Validation of immunofluorescent LC3 staining and comparison of diffuse LC3-I intensity with LC3-II-positive puncta scores. (A) Comparison of autophagosome detection by transmission electron microscopy (left and middle panels) or by LC3 immunofluorescent staining (right panel). Arrows indicate autophagosomes alone, double arrows indicate colocalization of autophagosomes with lysosomes. N, nucleus. (B) LC3-I intensity and LC3-II-positive puncta scoring of TPC-1 cells treated with vehicle or 3-methyladenine (3-MA, 10 mM) for 4 h. Data have been generated by quantitative analysis with FIJI software. P-values have been calculated by the Mann-Whitney U test. (C) LC3 western blot of TPC-1 cells treated with dimethyl sulfoxide vehicle or 3-methyladenine for 4 h. GAPDH staining was performed to serve as loading control.
Figure 2.Distribution of LC3 scoring in normal, benign and malignant tissue groups and its correlation with SQSTM1 expression. (A) Cross-tabulations of diffuse LC3-I intensity and LC3-II-positive puncta scores within the normal, benign and malignant tissue groups. Intermed., Intermediate. (B) Examples of LC3 staining patterns and autophagy scoring in tissue samples of 2 non-medullary thyroid cancer patients (1000x magnification). (C) Correlation between number of LC3-II-positive puncta with SQSTM1 expression in non-medullary thyroid cancer tissue specimens (N = 10).
Figure 3.Distribution of diffuse LC3-I intensity (A) and LC3-II-positive puncta (B) scores divided by tissue group (normal and benign versus malignant) and subdivided by thyroid pathology. P-values were generated by χ2 tests. FA, follicular adenoma; PTC, papillary thyroid cancer; FTC, follicular thyroid cancer; FVPTC, follicular-variant papillary thyroid cancer; ATC, anaplastic thyroid cancer.
Figure 4.Distribution of diffuse LC3-I intensity and LC3-II positive puncta scores within the malignant thyroid tissue group (A, B; N = 77) and adjacent normal thyroid tissue (C, D; N = 77) and its correlation with uptake of and clinical response to radioactive iodine treatment in the corresponding non-medullary thyroid carcinoma patients. P-values were generated by χ2 tests.
Figure 5.Correlation of membranous SLC5A5 (mSLC5A5) expression with uptake of and clinical response to radioactive iodine treatment (A), with diffuse LC3-I intensity (B) and with LC3-II-positive puncta scores (C) in non-medullary thyroid carcinoma tissues (N = 77). P-values were generated by χ2 tests.
Correlation between patient characteristics and category of autophagy expression score in the corresponding NMTC tumor tissues (diffuse LC3-I intensity).
| Category autophagy expression (diffuse LC3-I intensity) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient characteristics | None (N=3) | Low (N=28) | Intermediate (N=29) | High (N=17) | P-value* | |
| Age at diagnosis in years (mean [±SD ]) | 46.9 (±15 .2) | 52.2 (±15 .4) | 50.2 (±17 .0) | 51.9 (±17 .2) | 0.832 | |
| Gender (Female/Male) | 2/1 | 19/9 | 20/9 | 11/6 | 0.881 | |
| T-stage | T1 | — | 1 (3.6%) | 2 (6.9%) | — | 0.277 |
| T2 | — | 4 (14.3%) | 3 (10.3%) | 2 (11.8%) | ||
| T3 | 1 (33.3%) | 5 (17.9%) | 3 (10.3%) | 4 (23.5%) | ||
| T4 | 2 (66.7%) | 16 (57.1%) | 18 (62.1%) | 11 (64.7%) | ||
| Tx | — | 2 (7.1%) | 3 (10.3%) | — | ||
| N-stage | N0 | 2 (66.7%) | 17 (60.7%) | 15 (51.7%) | 6 (35.3%) | 0.373 |
| N1 | 1 (33.3%) | 7 (25.0%) | 11 (37.9%) | 8 (47.1%) | ||
| Nx | — | 4 (14.3%) | 3 (10.3%) | 3 (17.6%) | ||
| M-stage | M0 | 3 (100.0%) | 17 (60.7%) | 22 (75.9%) | 10 (58.8%) | 0.835 |
| M1 | — | 8 (28.6%) | 5 (17.2%) | 5 (29.4%) | ||
| Mx | — | 3 (10.7%) | 2 (6.9%) | 2 (11.8%) | ||
| Nr. RAI treatments | 0-1 | 2 (66.7%) | 15 (53.6%) | 17 (58.6%) | 10 (58.8%) | 0.146 |
| ≥2 | 1 (33.3%) | 13 (46.4%) | 12 (41.4%) | 7 (41.2%) | ||
| Cumulative RAI dose | <100 mCi | — | 9 (32.1%) | 10 (34.5%) | 9 (52.9%) | 0.089 |
| 100-200 mCi | 1 (33.3%) | 4 (14.3%) | 12 (41.4%) | 4 (23.5%) | ||
| >200 mCi | 2 (66.7%) | 15 (53.6%) | 7 (24.1%) | 4 (23.5%) | ||
| Disease after ablation | Remission | 2 (66.7%) | 15 (53.6%) | 17 (58.6%) | 10 (58.8%) | 0.329 |
| Persistent | 1 (33.3%) | 13 (46.4%) | 12 (41.4%) | 7 (41.2%) | ||
| Disease status during follow-up | Remission | 2 (66.7%) | 17 (60.7%) | 12 (41.4%) | 11 (64.7%) | 0.517 |
| Persistent | 1 (33.3%) | 10 (35.7%) | 16 (55.2%) | 6 (35.3%) | ||
| Recurrent | — | 1 (3.6%) | 1 (3.4%) | — | ||
P-values are generated by comparing group “none + low” with group “intermediate + high."
Correlation between patient characteristics and category of autophagy activity score in the corresponding NMTC tumor tissues (LC3-II-positive puncta).
| Category autophagy activity (LC3-II positive puncta) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient characteristics | None (N=7) | Low (N=20) | Intermediate (N=24) | High (N=17) | Maximum (N=9) | P-value* | |
| Age at diagnosis in years (mean [± SD]) | 49.7 (±17 .7) | 52.4 (±16 .6) | 51.0 (±15 .6) | 49.9 (±13 .6) | 47.6 (±11 .4) | 0.915 | |
| Gender (Female/Male) | 4/3 | 14/6 | 17/7 | 11/6 | 6/3 | 0.845 | |
| T-stage | T1 | — | 2 (10.0%) | 1 (4.2%) | — | — | 0.405 |
| T2 | 1 (14.3%) | 3 (15.0%) | 4 (16.7%) | 1 (5.9%) | — | ||
| T3 | 1 (14.3%) | 1 (5.0%) | 3 (12.5%) | 3 (17.6%) | 5 (55.6%) | ||
| T4 | 4 (57.1%) | 12 (60.0%) | 15 (62.5%) | 12 (70.6%) | 4 (44.4%) | ||
| Tx | 1 (14.3%) | 2 (10.0%) | 1 (4.2%) | 1 (5.9%) | — | ||
| N-stage | N0 | 3 (42.9%) | 8 (40.0%) | 11 (45.8%) | 12 (70.6%) | 6 (66.7%) | 0.124 |
| N1 | 4 (57.1%) | 9 (45.0%) | 7 (29.2%) | 5 (29.4%) | 2 (22.2%) | ||
| Nx | 3 (15.0%) | 6 (25.0%) | — | 1 (11.1%) | |||
| M-stage | M0 | 6 (85.7%) | 16 (80.0%) | 13 (54.2%) | 10 (58.8%) | 7 (77.8%) | 0.111 |
| M1 | 1 (14.3%) | 3 (15.0%) | 8 (33.3%) | 4 (23.5%) | 2 (22.2%) | ||
| Mx | — | 1 (5.0%) | 3 (12.5%) | 3 (17.6%) | — | ||
| Nr. RAI treatments | 0-1 | 2 (28.6%) | 7 (35.0%) | 13 (54.2%) | 13 (76.5%) | 9 (100.0%) | |
| ≥2 | 5 (71.4%) | 13 (65.0%) | 11 (45.8%) | 4 (23.5%) | — | ||
| Cumulative RAI dose | <100 mCi | 1 (14.3%) | 5 (25.0%) | 9 (37.5%) | 8 (47.1%) | 5 (55.6%) | |
| 100-200 mCi | 3 (42.9%) | 3 (15.0%) | 5 (20.8%) | 7 (41.2%) | 3 (33.3%) | ||
| >200 mCi | 3 (42.9%) | 12 (60.0%) | 10 (41.7%) | 2 (11.8%) | 1 (11.1%) | ||
| Disease after ablation | Remission | 2 (28.6%) | 7 (35.0%) | 13 (54.2%) | 14 (82.4%) | 8 (88.9%) | |
| Persistent | 5 (71.4%) | 13 (65.0%) | 11 (45.8%) | 3 (17.6%) | 1 (11.1%) | ||
| Disease status during follow-up | Remission | 1 (14.3%) | 5 (25.0%) | 14 (58.3%) | 15 (88.2%) | 7 (77.8%) | |
| Persistent | 5 (71.4%) | 14 (70.0%) | 10 (41.7%) | 2 (11.8%) | 2 (22.2%) | ||
| Recurrent | 1 (14.3%) | 1 (5.0%) | — | — | — | ||
P-values are generated by comparing group “none + low” with group “intermediate + high + maximum."