Literature DB >> 27105298

Shared decision-making in the care of individuals with diabetes.

V Serrano1,2, R Rodriguez-Gutierrez1,3, I Hargraves1, M R Gionfriddo1,4, S Tamhane1, V M Montori1.   

Abstract

People with diabetes often live with other chronic conditions and lead complicated lives. Determining what is the best management decision for a patient requires consideration of each individual's personal, social and biomedical context, what he or she values, the reasons he or she has to value the available options, and the relative contribution of each option in terms of benefits, harms, costs and inconveniences. Empathic conversations between patients and clinicians to diagnose the patient situation that necessitates action and the range of evidence-based actions that best address the situation, so-called shared decision-making, are essential to the personalized care of people with diabetes. The aim of the present review was to present key elements of shared decision-making and propose three different approaches for its application. The first approach focuses on transferring information to patients so that they can make decisions. The second approach, choice, focuses on cultivating the individual's ability to give voice to which choice is best for them. The third approach, conversation, establishes an empathic conversational environment through which the individual with diabetes and their clinician think and talk through how to address the problems of living with diabetes and related illnesses. These approaches are manifest in the design of evidence-based decision aids created to support shared decision-making. In randomized trials, decision aids can efficiently improve patient's knowledge, satisfaction, risk awareness, decisional conflict and involvement. Further research, however, is needed to better understand when and how to promote the empathic conversations, patient, clinician and service and policy contexts necessary to routinely implement shared decision-making in different at scale healthcare systems. In the interim, sufficient evidence and tools exist for persons with diabetes and their clinicians to gain expertise in making decisions together.
© 2016 Diabetes UK.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27105298     DOI: 10.1111/dme.13143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabet Med        ISSN: 0742-3071            Impact factor:   4.359


  22 in total

Review 1.  An Evidence-Based Medicine Approach to Antihyperglycemic Therapy in Diabetes Mellitus to Overcome Overtreatment.

Authors:  Anil N Makam; Oanh K Nguyen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Minimally Disruptive Medicine for Patients with Diabetes.

Authors:  Valentina Serrano; Gabriela Spencer-Bonilla; Kasey R Boehmer; Victor M Montori
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 4.810

3.  Identifying and Reducing Disparities in Young Adults With Diabetes.

Authors:  Molly Finnan; Shivani Agarwal
Journal:  Diabetes Spectr       Date:  2021-11-10

4.  Patient Markers of Successful Diabetes Management.

Authors:  Amy T Cunningham; Pouya Arefi; Alexzandra T Gentsch; Geoffrey D Mills; Marianna D LaNoue; Amanda M B Doty; Brendan G Carr; Judd E Hollander; Kristin L Rising
Journal:  Diabetes Spectr       Date:  2021-03-12

5.  How are patient-related characteristics associated with shared decision-making about treatment? A scoping review of quantitative studies.

Authors:  Sascha M Keij; Joyce E de Boer; Anne M Stiggelbout; Wändi Bruine de Bruin; Ellen Peters; Saïda Moaddine; Marleen Kunneman; Arwen H Pieterse
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 3.006

6.  Understanding the experience of veterans who require lower limb amputation in the veterans health administration.

Authors:  Chelsea Leonard; George Sayre; Sienna Williams; Alison Henderson; Daniel Norvell; Aaron P Turner; Joseph Czerniecki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 3.752

7.  Is Sociodemographic Status Associated with Empathic Communication and Decision Quality in Diabetes Care?

Authors:  Brigida A Bruno; Karen Guirguis; David Rofaiel; Catherine H Yu
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 6.473

8.  "I Didn't Really Have a Choice": Qualitative Analysis of Racial-Ethnic Disparities in Diabetes Technology Use Among Young Adults with Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Shivani Agarwal; Gladys Crespo-Ramos; Judith A Long; Victoria A Miller
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 7.337

9.  Assessing outcomes of enhanced chronic disease care through patient education and a value-based formulary study (ACCESS)-study protocol for a 2×2 factorial randomized trial.

Authors:  David J T Campbell; Marcello Tonelli; Brenda Hemmelgarn; Chad Mitchell; Ross Tsuyuki; Noah Ivers; Tavis Campbell; Raj Pannu; Eric Verkerke; Scott Klarenbach; Kathryn King-Shier; Peter Faris; Derek Exner; Vikas Chaubey; Braden Manns
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Clinical Application of Patient-Centered Diabetes Care for People With Serious Mental Illness.

Authors:  Jay A Hamm; Kelly D Buck; Jasmine D Gonzalvo
Journal:  Clin Diabetes       Date:  2017-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.