Literature DB >> 2710504

Intraocular foreign bodies. 297 consecutive cases.

W Behrens-Baumann1, G Praetorius.   

Abstract

The records of 297 patients with intraocular foreign body (IOFB) injuries were analyzed in a retrospective study ranging from 1956 to 1985, and the data of the three decades were compared. 62% of the IOFB were located in the vitreous, 13.5% in the posterior sclera. There was no significant difference between Haab's and Hirschberg's methods in removing the IOFB. In 6.7% an enucleation followed the primary operation, half of these due to postoperative infection. The number of injuries with IOFB has declined. The postoperative improvement of visual acuity has doubled in the last decade compared to the first. The importance of removing the IOFB is stressed, as an unsuccessful attempt considerably worsens the prognosis. 5 of the 297 cases were female, which emphasizes the causative occupational factor. Hammering was the commonest cause of IOFB (80%). None were wearing protective goggles. The importance of wearing protective goggles should be stressed in health education programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2710504     DOI: 10.1159/000309963

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologica        ISSN: 0030-3755            Impact factor:   3.250


  12 in total

1.  Ferrous intraocular foreign bodies retained in the posterior segment: management options and results.

Authors:  V Mester; F Kuhn
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  [Iris tumor with chronic uveitis].

Authors:  J Kuchenbecker; S Walter; R Fiedler; W Behrens-Baumann
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Occult intraocular foreign body: ultrasound biomicroscopy holds the key.

Authors:  Sushmita Kaushik; Parul Ichhpujani; Aparna Ramasubramanian; Surinder S Pandav
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging and the dangers of orbital foreign bodies.

Authors:  S Wheatcroft; L Benjamin
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Poor prognostic factors in post-traumatic endophthalmitis following open globe injury.

Authors:  Sukhum Silpa-Archa; Akkaranisorn Dejkong; Kwanchanoke Kumsiang; Peranut Chotcomwongse; Janine M Preble; C Stephen Foster
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  Open Globe Injury with Intraocular Foreign Body.

Authors:  Filippos Vingopoulos; Yvonne Wang; Seanna Grob; Chloe Yang Ling Li; Dean Eliott; Leo A Kim; Demetrios G Vavvas; John B Miller
Journal:  J Vitreoretin Dis       Date:  2020-11-19

7.  Trends and Disparities in the Incidence of Intraocular Foreign Bodies 1990-2019: A Global Analysis.

Authors:  Minjie Yuan; Qianyi Lu
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-06-20

8.  Spectrum of intra-ocular foreign bodies and the outcome of their management in Brunei Darussalam.

Authors:  Joshua George; Nadir Ali; Noor Affizan Rahman; Nayan Joshi
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 2.031

9.  Visual outcome and prognostic factors after magnetic extraction of posterior segment foreign bodies in 40 cases.

Authors:  C Chiquet; J C Zech; P Gain; P Adeleine; C Trepsat
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Visual and Anatomic Outcomes in Perforating Ocular Injuries.

Authors:  Levi N Kanu; Yi Jiang; Alvaro Fernandez-Vega Gonzalez; William F Mieler
Journal:  J Vitreoretin Dis       Date:  2019-09-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.